Pinkerton said:

I think you're wrong, Akira.

---

akira_akuma said:

redgreenvines, make an argument that pertains to what you are trying to attack.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/narod -- (eg, a race of peoples who, in ethnosociological terms, have vacated the ethnocentrum and have inculcated new forms of culture -- soon after comes the nation, in it's artifice, historically brought about by narods with cattle-driving ethnoses taken as servants -- eventually leading to slavery with the advent of civilizations' colonization in these beginning stages.)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E1%BC%94%CE%B8%CE%BD%CE%BF%CF%82 -- (ie, demos, but 'demos' only in relation to the narod.)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%AD%CE%B8%CE%BD%CE%BF%CF%82 (ethnos but as the progress of ethnodynamics reaches a point of ethnokinetic fruition)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Koine (ie, in ethnosociological terms of a race of peoples, "koineme", eg, a common source language which is shared in the ethnos of a koineme and makes said "koineme".)


a koineme is a language. in the dispersal of language (words as objects seen with 'action value') we construct structures of cultures from their original ethnos, and as this process (through ethnostatics, ethnodynamics, and at the final stage, ethnokinetics) breaks through the ethnocentrum, a narod is created. this is the beginning of the Tower Of Babel story.

this relates to the OP.

please...do your reading.

---

Quote:

the ethnos is always certain. uncertainty is of the narod. the narod always strives for the 'destruction of the new', which it itself is, and yet doesn't realize.

explains alot. including anti-semitism.

---

Quote:

consciousness is a self-reflective object of conception itself

---

yeah, well, that's well and good and all. i appreciate your indications and i must say, i agree. i was putting things figuratively, of course, when i said what i said. i was referring to it's "history" [and symbolizing it as a different history than that of a historicism, of the narod].

but yes, what you said is agreeable.

but what of history?

[ps: i added some poetic license to make distinctions between my figure of speech and the notion of 'consciousness as concept' as differentiated from 'concept-as-consciousness' - and might add that the notion i wish to condense here is that of the process of "memory" and how it's interactions function in this strata of effects - which is what i'm pertaining to when i speak of "history" in the indicative stance therein by way of my tacit airquotes. ]

here is a diagram to make distinct the sort of memoragic 'play of effects' qua the ethnos and it's reaction in society in it's various outgrowths of the split of the ethnocentrum.

Quote:

What you posted explains nothing of quantum mechanisms.

---

akira_akuma said:

Pinkerton said:

I think you're wrong, Akira.

---

i think you need to provide a counterargument to make that kind of claim, Pinkerton.

---

Pinkerton said:

akira_akuma said:

Pinkerton said:

I think you're wrong, Akira.

---

i think you need to provide a counterargument to make that kind of claim, Pinkerton.

---

What you posted explains nothing of quantum mechanisms.

---