Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

ots not so much who fabricated the facts as who believes them. These fake news sites target conservatives because liberals tend not to believe fake news. Conservatives can't seem to discern fake news from real news

---

hahahaha... did a youtube video result in a terrorist attack in benghazi?

---

It was used as cover for the attack. The attack was planned because there were video protests at consulates all over the Arab world.

---

so you believe the fake news when it comes from liberal sources, clinton claimed
the video was the cause and knew full well that was false when she made the
statements to the press.

---

akira_akuma said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Either way, conservatism is highly correlated with economic failure.

---

and as we know, correlation is not causation

---

so why does it happen, why do conservative policies end up tanking the economy, like under Bush?

---

specialpeopleclub said:

Economic policy isn't what allocates resources. Economic policy did in the USSR, and they had empty factories because since mercantilism, capitalism is the next system that works. Liberals just follow a religion thy has already failed

---

koods said:

The mastermind of the attack has stated that they used the protests as cover for their attack.

http://fair.org/uncategorized/fox-covers-up-a-benghazi-story/

Quote:

Fighters involved in the assault, which was spearheaded by a Islamist brigade formed during last year’s uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, said in interviews during the battle that they were moved to attack the mission by anger over a 14-minute, American-made video that depicted the Prophet Muhammad, Islam’s founder, as a villainous, homosexual and child-molesting buffoon. Their attack followed by just a few hours the storming of the compound surrounding the United States Embassy in Cairo by an unarmed mob protesting the same video.

---

---

Prisoner#1 said:

which bush policy cause the housing bubble to pop, which one created the housing
bubble? which bush policy created the banks that were too big to fail or stopped the
auditing of fanny mae and freddy mac, which bush policy was it that cause the market
to drop and land us in a recession?

---

Prisoner#1 said:

akira_akuma said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Either way, conservatism is highly correlated with economic failure.

---

and as we know, correlation is not causation

---

so why does it happen, why do conservative policies end up tanking the economy, like under Bush?

---

which bush policy cause the housing bubble to pop, which one created the housing
bubble? which bush policy created the banks that were too big to fail or stopped the
auditing of fanny mae and freddy mac, which bush policy was it that cause the market
to drop and land us in a recession?

---

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

The mastermind of the attack has stated that they used the protests as cover for their attack.

http://fair.org/uncategorized/fox-covers-up-a-benghazi-story/

Quote:

Fighters involved in the assault, which was spearheaded by a Islamist brigade formed during last year’s uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, said in interviews during the battle that they were moved to attack the mission by anger over a 14-minute, American-made video that depicted the Prophet Muhammad, Islam’s founder, as a villainous, homosexual and child-molesting buffoon. Their attack followed by just a few hours the storming of the compound surrounding the United States Embassy in Cairo by an unarmed mob protesting the same video.

---

---

you're still believing the fake news and propagating it

---

specialpeopleclub said:

Economic policy isn't what allocates resources. Economic policy did in the USSR, and they had empty factories because since mercantilism, capitalism is the next system that works. Liberals just follow a religion thy has already failed

---

koods said:

specialpeopleclub said:

Economic policy isn't what allocates resources. Economic policy did in the USSR, and they had empty factories because since mercantilism, capitalism is the next system that works. Liberals just follow a religion thy has already failed

---

Capitalism is going to fail the people. We will have to move to a socialist structure to survive. Automation is going to make human resources more and more irrelevant and unless we learn how to share the benefits of this progress across society, we will become irrelevant ourselves.

---

koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

The mastermind of the attack has stated that they used the protests as cover for their attack.

http://fair.org/uncategorized/fox-covers-up-a-benghazi-story/

Quote:

Fighters involved in the assault, which was spearheaded by a Islamist brigade formed during last year’s uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, said in interviews during the battle that they were moved to attack the mission by anger over a 14-minute, American-made video that depicted the Prophet Muhammad, Islam’s founder, as a villainous, homosexual and child-molesting buffoon. Their attack followed by just a few hours the storming of the compound surrounding the United States Embassy in Cairo by an unarmed mob protesting the same video.

---

---

you're still believing the fake news and propagating it

---

You just want to believe what you want to believe. The fucking terrorist who organized the attack says he was inspired by the video. Keep living in your bubble.

---

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

specialpeopleclub said:

Economic policy isn't what allocates resources. Economic policy did in the USSR, and they had empty factories because since mercantilism, capitalism is the next system that works. Liberals just follow a religion thy has already failed

---

Capitalism is going to fail the people. We will have to move to a socialist structure to survive. Automation is going to make human resources more and more irrelevant and unless we learn how to share the benefits of this progress across society, we will become irrelevant ourselves.

---

socialist, such as government takes control of the means of production and we all live on welfare?

---

koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

specialpeopleclub said:

Economic policy isn't what allocates resources. Economic policy did in the USSR, and they had empty factories because since mercantilism, capitalism is the next system that works. Liberals just follow a religion thy has already failed

---

Capitalism is going to fail the people. We will have to move to a socialist structure to survive. Automation is going to make human resources more and more irrelevant and unless we learn how to share the benefits of this progress across society, we will become irrelevant ourselves.

---

socialist, such as government takes control of the means of production and we all live on welfare?

---

No the means of production will be controlled by corporations and their robots. No need for workers. Should everyone benefit from technology or just the people who own the technology.

---

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

The mastermind of the attack has stated that they used the protests as cover for their attack.

http://fair.org/uncategorized/fox-covers-up-a-benghazi-story/

---

you're still believing the fake news and propagating it

---

You just want to believe what you want to believe. The fucking terrorist who organized the attack says he was inspired by the video. Keep living in your bubble.

---

your article is published on one of the worst fake news sites out there


but your insistence that the state department didnt know even though hillary's
emails state she knew the attack wasnt just a protest just reinforces the tone
that you believe the fake news

---

akira_akuma said:

specialpeopleclub said:

Economic policy isn't what allocates resources. Economic policy did in the USSR, and they had empty factories because since mercantilism, capitalism is the next system that works. Liberals just follow a religion thy has already failed

---

you are inept at following a point, and making one.

you have an economic policy if resources are being allocated. without one, people are essentially bartering...you want mercantilism? when the protection rackets come, what do you do?

but of course you don't want that. you want capitalism. you know that capitalism is an economic system

---

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Capitalism is going to fail the people. We will have to move to a socialist structure to survive. Automation is going to make human resources more and more irrelevant and unless we learn how to share the benefits of this progress across society, we will become irrelevant ourselves.

---

socialist, such as government takes control of the means of production and we all live on welfare?

---

No the means of production will be controlled by corporations and their robots. No need for workers. Should everyone benefit from technology or just the people who own the technology.

---

you ever work with a robot?

---

Quote:

I think you dystopian idea of most things being automated and is getting payed for that is very unlikely, like the one world governmemt idea, because of how people are. It's fucking stupid.

---

koods said:

It wasn't just a protest. Nobody is saying it was. It's was inspired by the video and the protests.

---

koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

you ever work with a robot?

---

I just used one a the grocery store where they have replaced half their cashiers with self checkout machines.

---

that's not a robot, that's the corporation training you to do the job of the cashier


this is a robot, it needs an operator and it needs maintenance personnel that include software programming and hardware repairs




this is a robot, it needs an operator and it needs maintenance personnel that include software programming and hardware repairs




I work with robots on a daily basis, what's supposed to save labor and eliminate
people actually has created more jobs because now we have to have people to do the
job of the robot when the robot is down, a frequent thing, and we have to have
people to work on the robots, it's usually 3 people doing this

we just got rid of 2 robots, they were welding robots, they didnt load the parts
themselves, they didnt remove the parts, they were not consistent int he welds and
their quality issues exceeded the number of errors from the humans doing the jobs