koods said:

Prisoner#1 said:

koods said:

Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.

---

hillary has admitted to it being true

---

Source?

---

Connoisseur said:

koods said:

Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.

---

oh really?

---

Turtletotem said:

Hahahahahaha
You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.

---

koods said:

Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.

---

Repertoire89 said:

Turtletotem said:

Hahahahahaha
You lot havenot had a honest election since Eisenhower.

---

Don't forget shit rolls down hill, and the US is at the top of that hill

---

But I don't wanna go to war with Russia because some rich billionaire fucks in the US needed to fuck with the Middle East

Prisoner#1 said:

Connoisseur said:

koods said:

Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.

---

oh really?

---

you know how it is, when it was about bush or republicans, wikileaks was 100% infallible

now that it's exposing the woman that koods wants to be, it's all lies


but you know the response was, "the russians hacked the DNC emails!" as opposed to
"I guess we should have known better than to email each other a bunch of racist
crap and conspire againsnt one of our own, for that we are sorry"

now it's "wikileaks is trying to sully my reputation" instead of "I'm only human,
of course I run a criminal enterprise, murder people, have others murdered and sit
back and cackle while still more are murdered, I embezzle funds from my charity,
sell government secrets and nuclear arms to our enemies and even eat babies for
breakfast because I am satan

---

Wikileaks is definitely attempting to sully her reputation. Clearly, these leaks are an attempt to destroy Clinton's ability to win the election. Assange has said as much, and keeps advertising bombshell revelations will lead to her indictment. .

The rest of what you said is total bullshit.

Turtletotem said:

koods said:

Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.

---

Wikileaks has proven over the years to be the most trustworthy source of information over any mainstream media institutions.

Is it that hard to believe that a person can say one thing in front of the camera's, but a different thing behind closed doors?

It's called being a lying bitch. Many people, especially politicians, do it all the time.

Now ask yourself, again:

Why would bankers need to be assured she'll stand against pot legalization?

And there you have it. That is what is going on.
You stand with Her, but she sure as hell aint standing with us.

---

Turtletotem said:

Koods can't see that the Bushes and the Clintons are two hands on the same belly.

"B-but.. she's a woman. And a democrat. I have been programmed to see her as the good guy!"

Hahahahahaha
You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.

---

koods said:

Turtletotem said:

koods said:

Wiki leaks is just making shit up at this point.

---

Wikileaks has proven over the years to be the most trustworthy source of information over any mainstream media institutions.

Is it that hard to believe that a person can say one thing in front of the camera's, but a different thing behind closed doors?

It's called being a lying bitch. Many people, especially politicians, do it all the time.

Now ask yourself, again:

Why would bankers need to be assured she'll stand against pot legalization?

And there you have it. That is what is going on.
You stand with Her, but she sure as hell aint standing with us.

---

Of course politicians tailor their message to their audience. I don't think she had put much though into pot legalization at the time. Her position is pretty mainstream. She has stated that she would not interfere in states that allow recreational use and that she would reschedule pot to recognize its medical utility. She supports decriminalization, but not full legalization. Frankly what she said to the bankers does not conflict with her public position at all. It should be noted that the federal government would be violating international treaties if it legalized pot.

Quote:

“I think that states are the laboratories of democracy, and four states have already taken action to legalize, and it will be important that other states and the federal government take account of how that’s being done, what we learn from what they’re doing. I think that the states moving forward is appropriate and I think the federal government has to move to make this more available for research that they can then distribute to interested people across our country. I do think on the federal level we need to remove marijuana from the Schedule I of drugs, move it to Schedule II, which will permit it to be the basis for medical research because it’s important that we learn as much as possible. And since it was a Schedule I drug we haven’t done that research. A lot of experts in the field are telling me we’ve got to learn a lot more.” WBZ NewsRadio, January 25, 2016

---

I think that is a totally reasonable position.

---

koods said:

Turtletotem said:

Koods can't see that the Bushes and the Clintons are two hands on the same belly.

"B-but.. she's a woman. And a democrat. I have been programmed to see her as the good guy!"

Hahahahahaha
You lot haven't had a honest election since Eisenhower.

---

I don't care if she's a woman it is important to me that a democrat is in the White House for the next four years. I think the Republican Party is philosophically incapable of governing. They are so anti-government that they shouldn't be given the responsibility for running one. The reject science. They are anti-intellectual. They are in total disarray,

But, I will say this, if Donald Trump were the democrat and Hillary Clinton the republican, I would still vote for Clinton. At this point, the primary concern of the American public should be to ensure that Donald Trump does not become president. He is someone who shows no ability to actually do the job. He is mentally unstable, capricious, paranoid, impulsive, vindictive, lazy, unprepared, unable to focus on tasks, thinks he an expert at everything despite being an expert at almost nothing, only listens to yes men, is a pathological liar, and he lacks even basic levels of humility and empathy. He's a narcissistic simpleton and an embarrassment to the country.

---

If the only good points about your candidate are that she isn't as bad as the other guy, how fucked as a nation is the US?

Konyap said:

TRUMP = DEATH LOL

---

Turtletotem said:

Repertoire89 said:

Turtletotem said:

Hahahahahaha
You lot havenot had a honest election since Eisenhower.

---

Don't forget shit rolls down hill, and the US is at the top of that hill

---

But I don't wanna go to war with Russia because some rich billionaire fucks in the US needed to fuck with the Middle East

---

I just meant that we're all fucked 

koods said:

Did i say that?

My position on trump has nothing to do with his politics. He's not up to the task of being president. He doesn't have the experience, he doesn't have the discipline, he doesn't have the knowledge and he doesn't have the intellect to manage the executive branch of the us government. it's like if the guy who runs the snack bar in a hospital were applying to be the chief surgeon.

---