Diploid said: In the hands of an MD who has been trained and went on to become a Diplomate of the American Board of Chelation Therapy it's extremely safe

The American Board of Chelation Therapy applied to the statutory Florida Board of Medicine a few years ago to be formally recognized by the state. The Florida Board denied the request on the grounds that the ABCT is a quack organization. Their certification examination, for example, consists almost entirely of True/False questions and the passing score required of a physician is very low. You don't test a medical doctor's knowledge with True/False questions. That's what astrology and psychic certification programs do.
C'mon man. You don't seem dumb to me. How can you push the ABCT as any sort of gold standard for chelation. The ABCT are quacks. You are not helping your case at all by citing them.
Quote: Chelation therapists in the United States have set up certifying boards so they can call themselves "board certified." The American Board of Chelation Therapy (ABCT) was founded in 1982 by Charles Farr, M.D., who practiced chelation therapy in Oklahoma. The American Board of Clinical Metal Toxicology (ABCMT) was founded in 2003 and now has its headquarters in Chester, Ohio. Neither is recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), which sets the certification standards for in the United States.
The Illinois corporate database states that the American Board of Chelation therapy qualified for nonprofit status in 1986 but its registration status was revoked in 2004 .
Quack Watch
It's interesting that you decided to cite the site of one of the biggest Quacks in the field of psychiatry by the name of Steve "The Quack" Barret. This is exactly how LiquidSmoke and I first met here on this site. Barret is currently being sued by just about everyone he's trashed and has be4en using stall tactics to prevent judgement for years now. He claims to have only earned about $60,000 over the past two years hey his legal bills are already well over a million dollars. Steve Barret is a douchebag, I've sent him email;s personally asking him to back specific arguments up. He never responds to anyone. Hundreds of people have reached out to him for evidence. The Quack Buster movement has been replaced by "The Skeptics". The head skeptic is Steve Novella who is a neurosurgeon and the Amaaaazing! Randi!, the guy who became famous for busting magic frauds. That fat f*ck who made a living discrediting spoon benders is now condemning MD's... Interesting to say the least... On the Dr Oz show Novella used crystals and acupuncture as examples of "Alternative" medicine. Now I'm not going to try and prop crystals because I could give a fuck but I don't that an "Alternative" MD uses crystals in their practice. NCCAM which is overseen by the NIH did studies and found that acupuncture is useful. Dr Oz of all people manhandled Novella, it was pathetic. Novella is currently trashing people who talk about altered states of consciousness, probably to allow some time to pass so people forget the ass whipping he got from Oz.
Fuck Barret if that all you have but let's look at the NIH's NCCAM and the study they coordinated.
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) Chelation for Coronary Heart Disease
Statement from NHLBI Director Gary H. Gibbons, M.D. regarding the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy
Quote: Preliminary results, which will be released during the American Heart Association’s 2012 Scientific Sessions, found that a chelation regimen is safe in the context of a clinical trial and suggest that there may be benefits in some patients with coronary heart disease. However, further research is needed, including replication of the results and research to determine whether the intervention can be safely and reliably delivered in a general practice setting, before chelation can be considered as a potential mainstream treatment option.
Because the study manuscript is currently under peer review, the NHLBI will refrain from further comment on the results until publication.
Questions and Answers: The NIH Trial of EDTA Chelation Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease
I'll let you cherry pick your information from that link to try and condemn it and see if I can come up with something on my own from it.
Alternative therapy produces intriguing results in some heart patients but many questions remain
Quote: “Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating heart disease, chelation therapy has been used for over 50 years and has generally been believed by conventional medical practitioners and cardiologists to be without value. A definitive answer on chelation therapy will take much additional research. The most exciting part of this study is that there may be an unexpected signal of benefit. We need to understand whether the signal is true, or whether it occurred by chance."
Quote: “The American Heart Association applauds the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine for sponsoring this study and the investigators for performing a trial that was difficult to conduct,” said Elliott Antman, M.D., chair of the AHA Scientific Sessions Program Committee, cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Mass. “Intriguing as the results are, they are unexpected and should not be interpreted as an indication to adopt chelation therapy into clinical practice.”
They're intriguing but because they were completely unexpected let's shit can the whole idea... This is somewhat similar to when they condemned Pauling and buffered intravenous vitamin C in the 1970's and are now using it more and more each day!
Now that's classic...
Quote: There was no impact on patient’s quality of life in this sub-study although the overall Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) showed chelation therapy cut the risk of death, second heart attacks, stroke and the need for heart procedures among some patients who already suffered an earlier heart attack.
Keep in mind this set of patients were so called "RANDOMLY" sampled and many of them had other underlying health issues like diabetes, hypertension and obesity to name a few.
It's intriguing one clown says but I guess because quality of life was only improved slightly we'll just completely disregard they didn't die, have a second heart attack, stroke or additional heart procedures. I have a question... ??? Why didn't they use ALL the patients who participated in the study to evaluate it overall? What's the deal with this? Did they pick the names out of a clown hat? Did a computer generate the names? I'll say one thing, every single patient I've met who has had the procedure were doing kick ass. One told me he was playing golf that afternoon... So in my minds eye this "RANDOM" sampling of patients out of all who participated may have very well been a cherry picking expedition. They don't want it to work. I have very serious doubts they used the appropriate dosages because I know for a fact they used just over 1/3 the dose required when they tested IVC in the 1970's.
I know how this game is played so you and all the others can say what you ant but at least one person thought it was intriguing. I'll bet if that guy develops artery disease he's getting his ass chelated! That's how these things work you know.
Pssst! By the way.... Nobody died!
|