I am about to argue that yes, absolutely; condensation in your fruiting chamber is an excellent indicator of high relative humidity. I will also argue that the reverse in not true; the lack of condensation is not an indicator of rh in any way.
Before you lock this thread, accuse me of blasphemy, burn me at the stake, etcetera, please hear me out.
Let's begin with a thought experiment: Imagine a glass orb floating in the vacuum of space. There is quite a bit of water in the orb and it has been floating for quite some time at a constant temperature.
The vapor pressure of the water is completely dependent on the temperature, so it also has been constant all this time. So we can expect that the relative humidity inside this orb is 100%. It has reached it's full potential for this constant temperature.
Our orb now floats through the shadow of some other object. It cools. The vapor pressure decreases, the volume of liquid water inside the orb increases. The vapor pressure is still at it's maximum potential. The rh is still 100%.
Our orb now floats out of the shadow. It warms. The vapor pressure begins to increase. The temperature is rising much faster than the water is evaporating back into a gas. The potential vapor pressure is now higher than the current vapor pressure. The rh of our orb is falling quickly, 90, 80, 70... The orb again reaches a constant temperature. The water is still evaporating; vapor pressure is now catching up with it's full potential at that constant temperature. The relative humidity is now rising, 70, 80, 90. It reaches it's full potential, 100% rh.
I argue that this is precisely what is happening inside our fruiting chambers. The warm moist air radiating from the mycelium is cooling against the walls of the chamber. The potential water vapor pressure is decreasing, forcing the vapor back into a liquid. It condenses against the wall of the chamber forming small droplets. Relative humidity begins to approach 100%, the small droplets now turn into small streams flowing downward into the perlite.
The cultivator looks at his or her terrarium and thinks, "Good, plenty of humidity in there. My babies should be happy."
Time passes. The cultivator dutifully fans his or her babies. Water vapor escapes and is replaced by the liquid water in the perlite. The water begins to get depleted. There's not enough water to sustain the h20 vapor pressure to it's maximum potential. The sides of the chamber are drying up. The cultivator looks at his or her fruiting chamber and thinks, "Oh no, I better water my babies. And gives the chamber a good misting." Water vapor pressure slowly reaches it's maximum potential. Water once again condenses on the sides of the chamber.
----- end thought experiment
Let's look at what the trusted cultivator's on this forum have to say on this issue. Names have been removed to protect the innocent.
Condensation is an indication of a temperature differential, and has absolutely ZERO to do with relative humidity inside the terrarium. What you're saying is that in the winter when condensation forms on your windows, your house must be at nearly 100%, when in fact it's closer to 10% or even less. When you pull a beer out of the refrigerator or pour a glass of iced tea in the summer and the glass gets wet, does this mean it's 100% humidity, even if you're in the Arizona desert? As said hundreds of times, condensation is caused by a TEMPERATURE differential between two surfaces.
This argument has been made a thousand times over on the cultivation forum. The same examples are made, the same argument is made, over and over.
Lets begin with the basis of the argument, "Condensation is an indication of a temperature differential."
It's TRUE.
In fact the ONLY independent variables that matter for the calculation of rh are the current vapor pressure of water in the space you are measuring and the temperature. That's it. The other factors are scientific constants.
Lets look at the examples given: the warm air in your house bumps against the cold glass of your windows and forms condensation, yet the rh of your house is nowhere near 100%.
True. However, the rh of the air bumping against the glass is approaching 100% as it slowly forced into a liquid state forming condensation on the glass. Same thing applies to a beer you take out of the fridge on a warm day. The rh of the air bumping into the cold glass is approaching 100%.
Fortunately for our cultivator. The volume of his fruiting chamber is much smaller than that of a house. It is also fortunate that the heat generated by the mycelium is small. The temperature differential we're talking about is 5 degrees F at most.
So while the principle they are discussing is correct, their conclusion is wrong and their examples don't apply. Our cultivator is perfectly rational in assuming the condensation on the walls of his fruiting chamber is an indicator of high relative humidity.
Let me state clearly though that the reverse is not true and thus can not be used to falsify my argument. The absence of condensation is not an indicator of relative humidity. It could be 100 or it could be zero. There just isn't any condensation action occurring.
Now you might be thinking: that's an absurd argument. My fruiting chamber does not exist in a vacuum. There's all kinds of other gases there doing god knows what. Well, believe it or not the vapor pressure of water is independent of the vapor pressure of other environmental gasses. While it's possible there's some polar solvent affecting the vapor pressure, that is just as likely to throw off a hygrometer, or kill the mycelium, or kill the cultivator for that matter. For our purpose, we can assume that the vapor pressure of water is independent of atmospheric pressure.
Sorry to challenge an established paradigm, but I'm quite certain I am correct.
Perhaps I should post a link to this thread on the chemistry forum to get some backup.
-------------------- The above post is fictional, hypothetical, or downright nonsensical.
Edited by anonjon (09/27/09 02:44 PM)
|