Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
More Subb Vs Foe ID
    #10501937 -

Probably pretty pointless posting this, but it's worth a shot. I know it's pretty difficult to tell the difference between Foes and Subbs without a print (which I am working on), but I am hoping maybe someone can tell me some info. I gathered probably a hundred or so Subbs/Foes in a really big manicured lawn today, seperating them as best as I could into 4 different types. They all look the same, however one has a grayish to brown cap, another has a dark brown cap, one has a smooth walnut cap, and the other has a redish brown cap with a slightly thicker stem. All of them from what I have gathered are either Subbs or Foes.

I am printing about 15 right now, but to be sure of the rest, should I print them all? It's a lot of mushroom as you can see from the pics. I know the answer is most likely yes, just trying to avoid some work :wink:. I have them all laying on foil right now with more foil covering them on top, will this be alright for the night if I take the rest of the prints tomorrow?

Here are some (crappy) pictures. Let me know what you think if you can gather anything without the prints. Thanks


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: founddelicious]
    #10501953 -

Not sure if you used a cell phone cam or a digi cam but if it happens to have macro mode (the one with the flower) press that button and try to get an auto-focus closeup. The details really help! Nice finds btw, even if it turns out inactive.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: World Spirit]
    #10501977 -

Unfortunately my digital camera is broken so I had to use my iPhone. Starting to hunt gives me a good incentive I think to finally fix it haha. Thanks though, I was surrounded by two small festivals going on with cops parked right by and tons of people walking near. I just pretended to be looking for my lost glasses...

Edited by founddelicious (06/14/09 12:30 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: founddelicious]
    #10502078 -

Just print them all, it's simple and really the best way to tell. I found some subbs that I could swear were foes last night but the print was jet black so they're good.


--------------------
Make my Funk the P Funk, I wants to get Funked up

LAGM2024

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: Gastronomicus]
    #10502262 -

I've been finding a ton of foes lately,  one tip I picked up is to look at the gills.  If the gills hang down below the margin of the cap it is most likely a foe.  this combined with the spore print (brown=foe, BLACK BLACK=sub)  seems to give a pretty definitive ID.

please wait for a trusted IDer before eating though:tongue:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: Beefy1]
    #10502310 -

def be sure to givem time to print enough, thin spore prints are hard to tell between foes-dark dark brown and subs-Jet Black. My buddy ate about 100 foes in a day thinking they were subs, although he didn't get diarrhea like we expected, it was still embarrassing.


--------------------
Trading Prints

-Nature gave us one tongue and two ears so we could listen twice as much as we speak-

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: TheShroomanizer]
    #10502512 -

TheShroomanizer said:
def be sure to givem time to print enough, thin spore prints are hard to tell between foes-dark dark brown and subs-Jet Black. My buddy ate about 100 foes in a day thinking they were subs, although he didn't get diarrhea like we expected, it was still embarrassing.



Haha wow. I actually thought about doing something similar. Patience is a real bitch. I placed them all to get prints about an hour ago so I guess tomorrow will be filled with much anticipation. I'll be sure to share the results :mushroom2:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: More Subb Vs Foe ID [Re: founddelicious]
    #10505023 -

All Foes... fuck. Dissapointing, but there's always tomorrow I guess.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* best way to distinguish between pan subbs/pan foes?
( 1 2 all )
dogfood91 14,885 28 07/06/19 10:49 PM
by Mitchnast
* Pan Subbs?Please help ID trippychick 2,364 17 09/29/03 11:45 AM
by falseaddiction
* Lookin for subb's again.. (ID help) GGreatOne234 2,299 13 05/19/01 02:21 AM
by Bleuboxo
* More Pans, First Pan subb!(PICS).. Need ID help Gumby 2,138 1 04/12/02 06:39 PM
by GGreatOne234
* Pan Subbs???
( 1 2 3 all )
QandA 9,950 42 05/22/04 04:55 AM
by Gumby
* Mass amounts of Pan Subbs in Ohio
( 1 2 all )
vandago 4,356 24 06/29/05 12:44 AM
by JoeyBond
* Pan Sub. Or pan Foe? resin 5,306 3 05/28/09 04:00 AM
by CureCat
* Pan subbs up in CNY...
( 1 2 all )
flanders53 8,281 33 05/22/03 12:28 AM
by flanders53

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, karode13, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
673 topic views. 1 members, 102 guests and 52 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.