Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Pan Cyan Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Could someone identify?
    #5612902 -

I found these in my backyard. I live in Houston, TX (Southeast).
Does anyone know what they are?
Thanks.

Here are the spore prints.

They are a nice dark black color.



















Edited by LiQuidSlim (05/10/06 04:02 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Could someone identify? [Re: LiQuidSlim]
    #5612962 -

You should print the mushies in your first picture and then edit your post noting the spore color.


--------------------
I think my eyes are getting better. Instead of a big dark blur I see a big light blur.

俺のシロシャイビケッルリプスがここです。

東京スカパラダイスオクストラ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Could someone identify? [Re: baycafe]
    #5613069 -

Aight, I did a spore print for the first set of pictures.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Could someone identify? [Re: baycafe]
    #5613075 -

Look like inactive panoleus species, probably Panoleus foenescii. However, I would also love to see a spore print on your finds.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Could someone identify? [Re: xmush]
    #5613268 -

Black spore prints would rule out Panaeolus foenisecci. Looks like you MIGHT have some panaeolus subbalteatus. You may want to check for any blue bruising at the base of the stipe where the mycelia is present.


--------------------
I think my eyes are getting better. Instead of a big dark blur I see a big light blur.

俺のシロシャイビケッルリプスがここです。

東京スカパラダイスオクストラ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Could someone identify? [Re: baycafe]
    #5613439 -

There's a shitload around here, only if they all were cubes!!! Every yard I look at there's mushrooms all over!!
Here are a few more I found.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Could someone identify? [Re: LiQuidSlim]
    #5613447 -

Quote:




Hm. It is some type of Panaeolus, possibly a psychoactive active one.

Definately check the base of all the stems for blue bruising..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Myyco.com Pan Cyan Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Can anyone identify these mushrooms? JohnnyJ 1,983 9 06/16/04 09:35 AM
by RoccaDogg
* Help identifying ssicko 905 5 05/18/05 12:25 AM
by CptnGarden
* Pan. castaneifoilus/or/foenisecci in Illinois PICS GGreatOne234 2,494 16 06/23/01 11:00 PM
by J_Twista
* Panaeolina foenisecci? moonrockmushy 740 7 06/11/11 01:49 AM
by moonrockmushy
* For Noobies: How to Find and Identify Panaeolus subbalteatus mjshroomer 42,121 12 02/23/10 11:13 AM
by German Kahuna
* Attention bored mushroom identifiers LikwidDrawp 2,130 11 09/12/03 11:02 AM
by canid
* Please help newbee to identify oversun 1,280 12 10/13/03 09:29 PM
by @cro
* Identifying psilocybe philipmulberry 6,007 14 10/10/20 06:36 AM
by Solvr40m

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, karode13, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
666 topic views. 1 members, 139 guests and 29 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.