"Here is the definition: - Mysticism is the art of union with Reality. The mystic is a person who has attained that union in greater or less degree; or who aims at and believes in such attainment. It is not expected that the inquirer will find great comfort in this sentence when first it meets his eye. The ultimate question, 'What is Reality?' - a question, perhaps, which never occurred to him before - is already forming in his mind; and he knows it will cause him infinite distress. Only a mystic can answer it: and he, in terms which other mystics alone will understand. Therefore, for the time being, the practical man may put it on one side....[W]e see that the distinction between the mystic and the non-mystic is not merely that between the rationalist and the dreamer, between intellect and intuition. The question which divides them is really this: What, out of the mass of material offered to it, shall consciousness seize upon - with what aspects of the universe shall it 'unite?'"
- Practical Mysticism by Evelyn Underhill, pp. 3-5, 1915
It is obvious that critics of mysticism, at least at this forum, have no experience which can be deemed mystical. Further, without such a radical intrusion into ordinary consciousness, there is no motivation to acquire knowledge 'about' mysticism either. This is one good reason why phenomena that constitute non-physical representations in consciousness (like psychic or Psi phenomena, televangelism, divination of various types and forms of magical practice) are all lumped together by those critics who are ignorant of the more accurate meanings of mysticism.
Underhill states that "mysticism is the art of union with Reality," and this is a something that happens at various levels, from the 'nature mystic' who may have a particular 'green thumb' and a 'way with animals' to the 'religious mystics' who oftentimes manifest excessive synchronistic phenomena to other observers. The Taoist mystic, for example, described by Sinologist Richard Wilhelm in some of C.G. Jung's works, http://www.ralphmag.org/BN/why.html, is a further development, somewhere on a continuum between the nature mystic and a religious mystic such as Neem Karoli Baba as described by Ram Dass in BE HERE NOW. Of course, there are copious writings of religious mystics in all the religious traditions of the world, from the ancient Hindu Upanishads to the Greek Plato to the Neoplatonists Plotinus, Philo of Alexandria (a contemporary of Jesus), and Dionysus the Areopagite - Pagan, Jewish and Christian, respectively.
It is the unfortunate plight of the rationalist, trapped in linear thought as it were, between two points - sort of like being a two dimensional creature living in Flatland, unable to comprehend a third dimension of up-down. For those unfamiliar with the book Flatland, the effect on a two dimensional being whose world is intruded upon by a third dimension human who inserts a fingertip in the two dimensional plane, is to see a point appear in thin air which broadens across his entire field of vision as a flesh-colored light. The two dimensional plane has been rent by a higher dimension and manifests in a unique phenomena. Thus the mystic, encountering a higher dimension in consciousness, can elicit the Intuition of successive, even Infinite dimensions which merge into a Oneness of consciousness. It is not an idea, it is not a fantasy, it is the Mystic Experience, and it is ineffable.
Those who have tasted the Absolute in some measure need have Compassion for the individual who is so uncompreheding that even the description of a model for approaching the Mystic Experience is lacking. Pity is reserved for the individual who is so egocentric that [s]he denies the existence of a Reality simply because [s]he has not experienced it him/herself, and is so fearful or close-mindedly linear that there is not even a possibility of considering the Mystic Experience as a possibility.
-------------------- γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself
|