Home | Community | Message Board

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Myyco.com Shop: Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
Media Bias Is Real
    #5110917 -

Auto-Summary
A UCLA-led study found that most major media outlets, including The Wall Street Journal, CBS, New York Times, and others, lean to the left, with only Fox News and the Drudge Report being more conservative. The study used a standard gauge of lawmakers' support for liberal causes to quantify media bias, finding that nearly all outlets lean left compared to the average U.S. voter.

Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist


Date: December 14, 2005
Contact: Meg Sullivan ( msullivan@support.ucla.edu )
Phone: 310-825-1046



While the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal, even more liberal than The New York Times. The Drudge Report may have a right-wing reputation, but it leans left. Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media. Meanwhile, almost all major media outlets tilt to the left.

These are just a few of the surprising findings from a UCLA-led study, which is believed to be the first successful attempt at objectively quantifying bias in a range of media outlets and ranking them accordingly.

"I suspected that many media outlets would tilt to the left because surveys have shown that reporters tend to vote more Democrat than Republican," said Tim Groseclose, a UCLA political scientist and the study's lead author. "But I was surprised at just how pronounced the distinctions are."

"Overall, the major media outlets are quite moderate compared to members of Congress, but even so, there is a quantifiable and significant bias in that nearly all of them lean to the left," said co‑author Jeffrey Milyo, University of Missouri economist and public policy scholar.

The results appear in the latest issue of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, which will become available in mid-December.

Groseclose and Milyo based their research on a standard gauge of a lawmaker's support for liberal causes. Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) tracks the percentage of times that each lawmaker votes on the liberal side of an issue. Based on these votes, the ADA assigns a numerical score to each lawmaker, where "100" is the most liberal and "0" is the most conservative. After adjustments to compensate for disproportionate representation that the Senate gives to low‑population states and the lack of representation for the District of Columbia, the average ADA score in Congress (50.1) was assumed to represent the political position of the average U.S. voter.

Groseclose and Milyo then directed 21 research assistants ? most of them college students ? to scour U.S. media coverage of the past 10 years. They tallied the number of times each media outlet referred to think tanks and policy groups, such as the left-leaning NAACP or the right-leaning Heritage Foundation.

Next, they did the same exercise with speeches of U.S. lawmakers. If a media outlet displayed a citation pattern similar to that of a lawmaker, then Groseclose and Milyo's method assigned both a similar ADA score.

"A media person would have never done this study," said Groseclose, a UCLA political science professor, whose research and teaching focuses on the U.S. Congress. "It takes a Congress scholar even to think of using ADA scores as a measure. And I don't think many media scholars would have considered comparing news stories to congressional speeches."

Of the 20 major media outlets studied, 18 scored left of center, with CBS' "Evening News," The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times ranking second, third and fourth most liberal behind the news pages of The Wall Street Journal.

Only Fox News' "Special Report With Brit Hume" and The Washington Times scored right of the average U.S. voter.

The most centrist outlet proved to be the "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer." CNN's "NewsNight With Aaron Brown" and ABC's "Good Morning America" were a close second and third.

"Our estimates for these outlets, we feel, give particular credibility to our efforts, as three of the four moderators for the 2004 presidential and vice-presidential debates came from these three news outlets ? Jim Lehrer, Charlie Gibson and Gwen Ifill," Groseclose said. "If these newscasters weren't centrist, staffers for one of the campaign teams would have objected and insisted on other moderators."

The fourth most centrist outlet was "Special Report With Brit Hume" on Fox News, which often is cited by liberals as an egregious example of a right-wing outlet. While this news program proved to be right of center, the study found ABC's "World News Tonight" and NBC's "Nightly News" to be left of center. All three outlets were approximately equidistant from the center, the report found.

"If viewers spent an equal amount of time watching Fox's 'Special Report' as ABC's 'World News' and NBC's 'Nightly News,' then they would receive a nearly perfectly balanced version of the news," said Milyo, an associate professor of economics and public affairs at the University of Missouri at Columbia.

Five news outlets ? "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer," ABC's "Good Morning America," CNN's "NewsNight With Aaron Brown," Fox News' "Special Report With Brit Hume" and the Drudge Report ? were in a statistical dead heat in the race for the most centrist news outlet. Of the print media, USA Today was the most centrist.

An additional feature of the study shows how each outlet compares in political orientation with actual lawmakers. The news pages of The Wall Street Journal scored a little to the left of the average American Democrat, as determined by the average ADA score of all Democrats in Congress (85 versus 84). With scores in the mid-70s, CBS' "Evening News" and The New York Times looked similar to Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., who has an ADA score of 74.

Most of the outlets were less liberal than Lieberman but more liberal than former Sen. John Breaux, D-La. Those media outlets included the Drudge Report, ABC's "World News Tonight," NBC's "Nightly News," USA Today, NBC's "Today Show," Time magazine, U.S. News & World Report, Newsweek, NPR's "Morning Edition," CBS' "Early Show" and The Washington Post.

Since Groseclose and Milyo were more concerned with bias in news reporting than opinion pieces, which are designed to stake a political position, they omitted editorials and Op‑Eds from their tallies. This is one reason their study finds The Wall Street Journal more liberal than conventional wisdom asserts.

Another finding that contradicted conventional wisdom was that the Drudge Report was slightly left of center.

"One thing people should keep in mind is that our data for the Drudge Report was based almost entirely on the articles that the Drudge Report lists on other Web sites," said Groseclose. "Very little was based on the stories that Matt Drudge himself wrote. The fact that the Drudge Report appears left of center is merely a reflection of the overall bias of the media."

Yet another finding that contradicted conventional wisdom relates to National Public Radio, often cited by conservatives as an egregious example of a liberal news outlet. But according to the UCLA-University of Missouri study, it ranked eighth most liberal of the 20 that the study examined.

"By our estimate, NPR hardly differs from the average mainstream news outlet," Groseclose said. "Its score is approximately equal to those of Time, Newsweek and U.S. News & World Report and its score is slightly more conservative than The Washington Post's. If anything, government‑funded outlets in our sample have a slightly lower average ADA score (61), than the private outlets in our sample (62.8)."

The researchers took numerous steps to safeguard against bias ? or the appearance of same ? in the work, which took close to three years to complete. They went to great lengths to ensure that as many research assistants supported Democratic candidate Al Gore in the 2000 election as supported President George Bush. They also sought no outside funding, a rarity in scholarly research.

"No matter the results, we feared our findings would've been suspect if we'd received support from any group that could be perceived as right- or left-leaning, so we consciously decided to fund this project only with our own salaries and research funds that our own universities provided," Groseclose said.

The results break new ground.

"Past researchers have been able to say whether an outlet is conservative or liberal, but no one has ever compared media outlets to lawmakers," Groseclose said. "Our work gives a precise characterization of the bias and relates it to known commodity ? politicians."

-UCLA-

http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=6664


100 is ultraliberal and 0 is ultraconservative.

85.1 Wall Street Journal (front page)
73.7 CBS Evening News
73.7 New York Times
70.0 Los Angeles Times
66.6 CBS Early Show
66.6 Washington Post
66.3 Newsweek
66.3 NPR Morning Edition
65.8 U.S. News and World Report
65.4 Time Magazine
64.0 NBC Today Show
63.4 USA Today
61.6 NBC Nightly News
61.0 ABC World News Tonight
60.4 Drudge Report
56.1 ABC Good Morning America
56.0 CNN NewsNight with Aaron Brown
55.8 Newshour with Jim Lehrer
39.7 Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume
35.4 Washington Times

Interesting. About 65% of the public believes this as well, and greatly distrusts the press as a result.

In other news, left leaning news outlets such as CNN and the NYT's continue to dramatically lose customers.

Could there be a connection....?? Hmmm.....


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: lonestar2004]
    #5110971 -

> In other news, left leaning news outlets such as CNN and the NYT's continue to dramatically lose customers.

Just like the music industry, it has nothing to do with quality of product, but rather with people swapping digital versions of the news...  :rolleyes:  (sarcasm for the too serious readers)


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Seuss]
    #5111017 -

Ever since the ACLU, defended NAMBLA, I could give a rats ass what the results were from any study they did.


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: lonestar2004]
    #5111164 -

lonestar2004 said:
They tallied the number of times each media outlet referred to think tanks and policy groups, such as the left-leaning NAACP or the right-leaning Heritage Foundation.



Rush Limbaugh talks about the NAACP all the time. So that's supposed to mean he's liberal? I'm not convinced this methodology is valid.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (12/27/05 02:29 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: lonestar2004]
    #5111325 -

Well, duh.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: SirTripAlot]
    #5111750 -

SirTripAlot said:
Ever since the ACLU, defended NAMBLA, I could give a rats ass what the results were from any study they did.



This isn't from the ACLU, it's from UCLA. Lysdexic?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #5111783 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
lonestar2004 said:
They tallied the number of times each media outlet referred to think tanks and policy groups, such as the left-leaning NAACP or the right-leaning Heritage Foundation.



Rush Limbaugh talks about the NAACP all the time. So that's supposed to mean he's liberal? I'm not convinced this methodology is valid.



This came up in a previous thread from you. Over thousands of citations it can be accurate. Don't forget, you are reading a partial description of a study written by a journalist who probably didn't read it's premise, methodolgy or conclusions himself. It may be dismissable and inaccurate, although I doubt it, but your particular objection is knee jerk against what you don't want to hear and invalid on the basis of the fact that it is made with no information at all. Typical. If you want to question the methodology of the study, FIND OUT WHAT IT IS, instead of quoting a minimal description supplied by a non-scientist.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5112157 -

zappaisgod said:
your particular objection is knee jerk against what you don't want to hear and invalid on the basis of the fact that it is made with no information at all.  Typical.  If you want to question the methodology of the study, FIND OUT WHAT IT IS, instead of quoting a minimal description supplied by a non-scientist.



Ah, you've greatly underestimated me.  Before I made my post, I did a Google search on the pros and cons of this study, and even looked at the  the report itself!  Here is a direct quote taken from that report:

Quote:
"To compute our measure, we count the times that a media outlet cites various think tanks.  We compare this with the times that members of Congress cite the same think tanks in their speeches on the floor of the House and Senate.  By comparing the citation patterns we can construct an ADA score for each media outlet."



Doesn't sound much different from the journalist's article, does it?  There's really not much more to it; feel free to read the report and tell me if you think I'm missing something important.  Here's another quote from the report:

Quote:
"we only wanted cases were the legislator or journalist cited the think tank as if it were a disinterested expert on the topic at hand."



They think the NAACP is cited as a "disinterested" expert???  Okaaaaaaay...

And this:

Quote:
"Perhaps the biggest surprise of Table 1 is the average score for the ACLU.  Weighted by citations, the average score, is 42.66, which is near the center of congressional scores.  Weighted by sentences, the average score is 34.99, which is to the right of the average member of Congress.  The primary reason that the ACLU appears so conservative is that it opposed the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance bill.  Consequently, conservatives tended to cite this fact often.  Indeed, slightly more than half of the ACLU sentences cited in Congress were due to one person, Mitch McConnell (R.-Kt.), who strongly opposed the McCain-Feingold bill.  If we omit ACLU citations that are due to McConnell, then the average score, weighted by sentences, increases to 70.12."



They've artificially fudged their results because they know something is "wrong".  I think this alone shows the study is bogus.



Rather than accusing me of not doing my research, I suggest you do yours, and present counterevidence when you believe I'm wrong.  I'm always prepared to back up my posts, but you need to tell me why you think I'm wrong so I can defend my position.  Anyone can accuse anyone else of making "kneejerk" posts with "no information at all", but it's best to back up those statements with evidence.

Good luck defending this article!  :mushroom2:

Here's a few good links to help get you started:
Dow Jones responds to UCLA media bias "study"
Stanford's Geoff Nunberg blasts Groseclose-Milyo media bias study
How the Liberal media myth is created


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #5112461 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
you've greatly underestimated me!!!!!

:rolleyes:



Here is a link to their study.  in case you are interested. It gives some of the mathematics used in the model.

http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.pdf


Have you tried to published a paper? Done any research? Or do you just look for flaws and call articles "BOGUS"?



here is a table in their paper showing the leanings of some legislators. Seems pretty right on to me:

Maxine Waters (D-CA) 99.6
Ted Kennedy (D-MA) 88.8
John Kerry (D-MA) 87.6
average Democrat 84.3
Tom Daschle (D-SD) 80.9
Joe Lieberman (D-CT) 74.2
Constance Morella (R-MD) 68.2
Ernest Hollings (D-SC) 63.7
John Breaux (D-LA) 59.5
Christopher Shays (R-CT) 54.6
Arlen Specter (R-PA) 51.3
James Leach (R-IA) 50.3
Howell Heflin (D-AL) 49.7
Tom Campbell (R-CA) 48.6
Sam Nunn (D-GA) 48.0
Dave McCurdy (D-OK) 46.9
Olympia Snowe (R-ME) 43.0
Susan Collins (R-ME) 39.3
Charlie Stenholm (D-TX) 36.1
Rick Lazio (R-NY) 35.8
Tom Ridge (R-PA) 26.7
Nathan Deal (D-GA) 21.5
Joe Scarborough (R-FL) 17.7
average Republican 16.1
John McCain (R-AZ) 12.7
Bill Frist (R-TN) 10.3
Tom Delay (R-TX) 4.7


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: lonestar2004]
    #5112546 -

lonestar2004 said:
:rolleyes:

Here is a link to their study.  in case you are interested. It gives some of the mathematics used in the model.

http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/groseclose/Media.Bias.pdf




Nowhere did I challenge his mathematical model.  For the sake of argument, I'll even agree that his math is 100% correct.

The problem is, when you put garbage into a mathematical model, you get garbage out.  I challenged the data that went into the model, not the model itself.  My claim was that the number of times an organization is mentioned doesn't correlate to the liberalness of the source that mentions the data.  The ACLU example proved this.

Quote:
Have you tried to published a paper? Done any research? Or do you just look for flaws and call articles "BOGUS"?



Yes.  And I know that if you find a flaw in what your argument is based on, the rest of the argument is worthless, no matter how good the rest of it is.  Garbage in, garbage out.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (12/28/05 03:27 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #5112613 -

Quote:
Few studies provide an objective measure of the slant of news, and none has provided a way to link such a measure to ideological measures of other political actors.



This is the purpose given in the introduction. Notice that other studies have measured media bias previously but here they attempt to provide a system of comparison rather than placing media outlets on an arbitrary political spectrum. They use congressmen who have proffessed their political leanings as a measure of media bias.

This is quite an elegent method compared to previous studies and that is why it is recieving attention. There are some weaknesses, of course, but the quantitative study appears to be valid. They left the sociological interpretations out, which is the most important part because there are many ways to look at this from a social/political viewpoint. You could always argue that conservative congressmen are generally more "centrist" than liberals, thus skewing the media bias results to the liberal side. The assumption is that both ideological sides of congress represent equal distances from center.

Quote:
They've artificially fudged their results because they know something is "wrong". I think this alone shows the study is bogus.



They did not "fudge" the result. They pointed out that the limitation of this study is that they compare the attitude of media outlets to congressmen of particular political affiliations. They show that the system is prone to anamolies from time to time. I don't think that is enough to disregard it altogether.

Edited by Catalysis (12/27/05 09:33 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #5112732 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
"I know that if you find a flaw in what your argument is based on, the rest of the argument is worthless, no matter how good the rest of it is. Garbage in, garbage out."




I did not find the study to be Garbage. I found it interesting.

Apparently getting a "Bogus, Garbage" study reviewed and approved by your peers and then published in an economics journal must be easy....


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: lonestar2004]
    #5114501 -

Is there really much of a question as to wether there is media bias and slant one way or the other? I do not need any study or analysis to know that certain outlets lean to the right and certain outlets lean to the left. Watch hardball one night and then Bill O'Reilly right after. They cover alot of the same topics but obviously with extremely different point of views. Study Complete in my book.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: allentownpaguy]
    #5115681 -

I didn't mean to be away, I just was. I find absolutely no problem with their methodology and I continue to have a problem with your (falcon) "characterization by retard" quote, which is very much what you did. I'm glad you read the study itself and I'm pleased that you linked it. You should've done that in the first place.

That being said, I have no problem with the methodology. If you use the same criteria to ascribe values to Congress critters and compare that to media critters and get a difference it is a valid comparison and significant (depending on the testing criteria used and theirs seems to be good to better than a 95% reliability). To quote from them,
"Most of the mainstream media outlets that we examined (ie all those besides Drudge Report and Fox News? Special Report) were closer to the average Democrat in Congress than they were to the median member of the House."

If you are going to produce weak shit like you did it will pretty much always get called here. At least if I give a shit about the subject.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: lonestar2004]
    #5115721 -

Good God. I am amazed every time people waste money on a study like this. Of course the MSM is left-leaning. That hasn't, and won't change anytime soon. You people need to stop arguing over something that isn't even a debatable issue.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Redstorm]
    #5115805 -

Quote:
I am amazed every time people waste money on a study like this. Of course the MSM is left-leaning. That hasn't, and won't change anytime soon. You people need to stop arguing over something that isn't even a debatable issue.





My thoughts as well. If ever there was a "Dog Bites Man" story, this is it.




Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Redstorm]
    #5115807 -

Yeah, I know and you know but some people need a serious cluebat application. And I personally have no intention of stopping.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5115817 -

You know it's not going to change their opinion in the slightest. Sometimes it's better just to ignore the children, lest you encourage their silly behavior.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: Redstorm]
    #5115848 -

But it's fun! Would you deny me my sport? Between this and 20 sec internet porn samples I have nothing else. Would you relegate me to stroking turtles and diddling gerbils? I tried it and it wasn't this much fun. Sometimes I write a helluva sentence that I otherwise would never have generated.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Media Bias Is Real [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5115906 -

I :heart: you, Zappa.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]

Myyco.com Shop: Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Media Bias silversoul7 1,150 9 08/30/04 11:44 PM
by silversoul7
* An Englishmans take on Liberal media bias in the US ... GazzBut 1,051 13 10/11/04 07:40 PM
by unbeliever
* No Liberal Media Bias... uh huh.
( 1 2 all )
Phred 2,742 27 06/24/04 08:45 AM
by germin8tionn8ion
* Media Bias
( 1 2 3 all )
luvdemshrooms 3,857 56 07/02/03 11:40 PM
by hongomon
* No media bias? luvdemshrooms 1,262 7 02/18/04 08:56 PM
by zappaisgod
* The "left-wing" media bias... Xlea321 936 7 08/01/03 01:34 AM
by Xlea321
* Media Bias Anonymous 655 13 04/12/03 05:22 AM
by enotake2
* An example of liberal media bias Divided_Sky 662 4 08/30/04 12:37 PM
by Divided_Sky

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
4,374 topic views. 9 members, 9 guests and 42 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.041 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 18 queries.