Home | Community | Message Board


Coca Leaf Shop
Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> Mushroom Cultivation

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Original Seeds Store Shop: Buy Cannabis Seeds, Buy CBD

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineTryptamine
Stranger
Registered: 10/15/01
Posts: 19
Loc: Northeast Ohio - Clevelan...
Last seen: 16 years, 2 months
Reverse Sterility Theory
    #448993 - 11/06/01 02:48 PM (16 years, 5 months ago)

I have a theory about sterility and I thought I'd post it here and see what you all thought:

It seems to me that the less sterile you are during the initial phases of innoculation/casing the more resiliant the mycellium is to contamination because it's been "vaccinated" against it already. I don't mean being overly dirty, but just using some basic common sense cleaning procedures and not shooting for a completely 100% sterile environment. I think if you aim for complete sterility then even the smallest little bit of contamination will quickly spread, but if you have "tough" mycellium it can better fight off outsiders. What do you guys think?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinelemming
evil

Registered: 10/28/01
Posts: 107
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
Re: Reverse Sterility Theory [Re: Tryptamine]
    #449014 - 11/06/01 03:05 PM (16 years, 5 months ago)

Not really, since the contaminants usually start spreading before the mycelium starts growing and you get fucked in the ass, of course this is while inoculating.
While casing, I agree that there is no need to be fanatics about sterlity, since the mycelium is already nice and strong, only commons sense is needed, of course if you sneeze in the casing while it's being colonized you're a miserable idiot, but that's just my thoughts.



--------------------
As evil as a dwarf can get...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleChampion des Champignons
long standing member;)

Registered: 07/27/00
Posts: 2,679
Loc: Alba
Re: Reverse Sterility Theory [Re: Tryptamine]
    #449176 - 11/06/01 06:34 PM (16 years, 5 months ago)

Mushrooms don't have an immune system as such, so your idea dosn't really make much sense.


--------------------
---------------------------------------------------
hmmm........


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Original Seeds Store Shop: Buy Cannabis Seeds, Buy CBD

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> Mushroom Cultivation

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Loading up substrate and sterilizing later? liftedoff420 779 16 02/20/03 04:06 AM
by blackout
* best sterilizer Scourge 857 7 10/15/01 11:36 PM
by SlattMoan
* Did my friends sterilization method work? BongHit 609 2 07/21/01 04:35 PM
by Anno
* Re: Should I have a low contamination rate? Coma of Souls 677 6 01/08/00 07:25 PM
by Anonymous
* sterilizing contaminated jars Anonymous 821 2 12/03/02 03:02 PM
by Fred Garvin
* Need advice on sterility & trading spores. The_Gnome_King 1,612 14 06/05/01 12:16 AM
by Azure
* New Tek is complete, What do you think?
( 1 2 3 all )
NewbieShroomer 12,713 43 12/21/01 10:43 PM
by Necron99
* Possible contamination questions... first timer! kspoker 729 6 12/16/02 04:44 AM
by Psychoslut

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Roadkill, Magash, Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, Citric, total, FooMan, 13shrooms, stonesun, cronicr, PussyFart, Tmethyl, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta
640 topic views. 22 members, 72 guests and 25 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.016 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.