Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Sporeworks.EU Shop: Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]
London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism
    #4383324 -

I thought Bush said that we were fighting the terrorists in Iraq (even though there are more there now than before we invaded) so that we didnt have to fight them here. Our biggest allie in Iraq just got bombed by terrorists. Case closed. The Iraq war does nothing towards the cause of defeating terrorism. Our invading Iraq actually insites terrorists to take action and makes civilians with dead loved ones think terrorist thoughts towards America.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Edited by 1stimer (07/08/05 11:43 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: 1stimer]
    #4383409 -

yeah..
terrorists don't kill..
policies do.


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: lonestar2004]
    #4383484 -

do you have a source that Muslims were responsible for the bombings in London.

yesterday i assumed that they were Muslims and was called a racist.


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: lonestar2004]
    #4383574 -

Well seeing as how the only people claiming responsibility are an al-Qaeda fringe group...


Who called you a racist for suggesting it? One of the left-wing nutties?


--------------------
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: 1stimer]
    #4383595 -

There are going to be terrorist attacks by radical Muslims regardless of what is done around the world.

"even though there are more there now than before we invaded"

If you don't mind me asking, where did you find the information to back that statement?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: trendal]
    #4383631 -

"One of the left-wing nutties?" i am sure.

also when i mentioned that AL-queda was claiming responsibility someone with a potty mouth said:

"any fucking body can post something on the Internet."



but i was wrong about saying
not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim.

i have changed it to not all Muslims are terrorists but almost all terrorists are Muslims.

and the silence of all the Muslims leaders around the world not condemning these bombings in london is deafening.


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: 1stimer]
    #4383679 -

This bombing proves nothing.

It is possible that the war in Iraq has reduced the number of terrorist activities that would have happened if there were no war. There is no way to know for sure if the war has reduced, increased or had no affect on the number of terror attacks.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: lonestar2004]
    #4384016 -

Actually, a number of moderate Muslims in England have condemned the attacks, as did some in Iraq (of course) and even in Iran.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/08/london.muslims/index.html


Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: Phred]
    #4384040 -

good

Next there needs to be a Fatwa against Bin Laden.


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: newuser1492]
    #4384061 -

It's a very simple connection to make really. Before Iraq there was no muslim terrorism in england. Now there is. Hmm, why is that? I know it probably has something to do with blair being stuck up bush's ass day and night. The UK is the only major nation that regularly provides strong vocal support for the US and for our shared goals. They are meddling in the middle east, which is of course exactly why terrorists despise the American government, so naturally the UK becomes a target as well.

Also, off topic a bit, but does anyone else find it a bit infuriating when Bush dumbs down the terrorists goals in some sort of effort to de-understand them? He says "The terrorists mission is to kill and maim innocent people" That's retarded though. Their goal with this london bombing was probably more about disrupting englands workforce, economy, and tourism industry (which they have done btw)the fact that innocent people die when they destroy the subway is just icing on the cake for them and it's incidental to their larger plans. Saying their "barbaric" mission is to kill and maim innocent people is like saying the US army's mission in Iraq is to kill innocent people. It has nothing to do with liberation or WMD's or anything. It's the same thing really, and it just irritates me that he feeds everyone this simple little dumb downed explanation for something that is so complex. And then people believe him...it's amazing, and part of the reason why we will never win the "war on terror" with this current pile of shit strategy.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: Vex]
    #4384069 -

It's not the same thing at all.

The terrorists goal is to demoralize and create fear in the masses of the country they attack by killing defenseless civilians.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: Redstorm]
    #4384144 -

Quote:
The terrorists goal is to demoralize and create fear in the masses of the country they attack by killing defenseless civilians.


Do you have any sources?


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: 1stimer]
    #4384148 -

This is the widely held definition of terrorism. Go look it up if you don't believe me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: Redstorm]
    #4384176 -

From what I have read about terrorists (even the homegrown ones) they were angry with a/the government, and were trying to hurt the government, rather than "scare" people.

Just because people were scared....dosen't mean that scaring people, was the terrorists objective.......just a bonus :shrug:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: niteowl]
    #4384179 -

Maybe terrorist like the IRA fit into your description. They can be negotioated with and can give them what they want.

The radical fundamentalists can not be negotiated with, since many of their goals are biblical ones.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: Redstorm]
    #4384203 -

There is no connection between invading Iraq and making the American homeland safer from this kind of terrorism. In fact, attacking Iraq causes this kind of terrorism.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: newuser1492]
    #4384230 -

It is possible that the war in Iraq has reduced the number of terrorist activities that would have happened if there were no war. There is no way to know for sure if the war has reduced, increased or had no affect on the number of terror attacks.

It is great to know that we have spent upwards of $200 billion and many thousands of lives without ever knowing, or being able to know, that we are getting value for the cost.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: 1stimer]
    #4384290 -

Let's see, major terrorist attacks worldwide increased from 175 in 2003 to 625 in 2004 and we've just seen the largest bombing attack in London since WWII.  Are these neo-con indicators of success? 

Does anyone honestly believe that we in the U.S. are somehow immune from further terrorist attacks, that we are somehow safer since there hasn't been an attack since September 11, 2001? 

From February 27, 1993 till April 18, 1995 (the day after the first WTC bombing and a day before the Oklahoma city bombing) it could be argued using the same childlike thinking as Bush's supporters that America was safer from terrorist attacks than on February 26, 1993 merely based on the fact that there hadn't been a major terror attack in the U.S.  Likewise, using the same naive reasoning it could be said that from April 20, 1995 to September 10, 2001 that America was safer from terrorist attacks than on April 19, 1995.  We of course know from history that the truth is different, that an attack had not occurred is not proof that American citizens were any safer.  As a matter of fact, there is increasing lethality with each attack.

February 26, 1993 - 6 people killed
February 27, 1993 to April 18,1995 - neo-con rationalization says we're safer :nut:
April 19, 1995 - 168 people killed
April 20, 1995 to September 10, 2001 - neo-con rationalization says we're safer :nut:
September 11, 2001 - 2985 people killed
September 12, 2001 to present - neo-con rationalization says we're safer :nut:


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.

Edited by Prosgeopax (07/08/05 04:49 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: Redstorm]
    #4384469 -

Redstorm said:
The radical fundamentalists can not be negotiated with, since many of their goals are biblical ones.


I agree that some of their demands are rather extreem, but that dosent mean that the ONLY reason terrorists exist is to spread fear.

They have a goal, and frightening the puiblic, isn't their main goal.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism [Re: niteowl]
    #4384495 -

London Bombings proves terrorism does not deter the Iraq war. Case closed.


--------------------
I am in love with Acidic_Sloth


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]

Sporeworks.EU Shop: Spores for European Microscopy

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Iraq War Quiz
( 1 2 all )		 RonoS 3,172 21 03/27/03 02:51 PM
by Murex
* No humanitarian case for Iraq war Xlea321 1,049 2 01/30/04 04:02 AM
by Xlea321
* Bush's rush to Iraq War Helping al-Qaida fft2 538 0 07/14/04 03:49 AM
by fft2
* Military families grow angry with state of Iraq war Zahid 1,050 4 10/30/03 04:21 PM
by PsiloKitten
* Iraq war recap
( 1 2 3 all )		 iglou 3,096 43 08/08/03 06:55 AM
by ololiuqui
* Bush Wants Another $70 bn For Failed Iraq War! ekomstop 1,283 19 10/27/04 02:31 AM
by FrankieJustTrypt
* Blix: "Iraq war was illegal" Xlea321 598 1 03/06/04 02:44 AM
by orion
* Top GOP Rep Calls Iraq War 'Unjustified' fft2 882 9 08/20/04 10:50 AM
by whiterasta

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
6,243 topic views. 1 members, 21 guests and 10 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.037 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 16 queries.