Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore Bulk Substrate   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]
Hankys ban?
    #4144875 -

Pics, hell. I've seen the pics.
My problem resides in the moderation/editing/deletion of said offensive threads.
Changing a link letter and banning the user?
Maybe, given that Hanky is an extreme case.
Banned indefintely?
Give me a good goddamn reason.

There is none, other than personal dislike.
Same as PGF for goatsex.ce'ing PA&L.
No good reason.
Except this was in OTD. I fail to see any viable reason short of attempted drug dealing thru the board/server (DONE THE FUCK BEFORE) or other legal liabilities. being a reson for a ban.
For Geordi (unless there were private messages that i don't know about) the reason was fucking scanty.
"stop trolling" or however t was phrased, is not a sufficient warning.

Hanky posted some nasty chicken fucking. This is true.
Perma ban? Come on. Explain to me why, mod(s).
And give me a real debate, not a "he broke the rules" circular reasoning this time.

You're killing the OTD forum thru your support of biased decisions. This may be the goal, but if it isn't, be aware.


--------------------
sadsappysucker said:
i want to ram my fat dick in hankys pooper



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Madweed420shroom]
    #4144879 -

Thankz go out to Randolph Carter for the body of the above post.


--------------------
sadsappysucker said:
i want to ram my fat dick in hankys pooper



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Madweed420shroom]
    #4144886 -

>Perma ban? Come on. Explain to me why, mod(s).

There is a system about how long the ban is.

Fist time: Warning

Second time: A few days ban.

Third time: 14 days ban.

Last time: permanent


--------------------
Grow Mushrooms from Spores - PF-Tek for Simple Minds

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144892 -

Whats your point?


--------------------



[quote]KristiMidocean said:
Good now thats clear.WHO FUCKING CARES. If I am fat u all keep pointing it out like its suppose to be a secret.LIke u really have nothing better to do then make fat jokes. If o know its like I do I know yall can come up with NEW AND BETTER SHIT . This shit is old and boring . I left in the first place cause this shit got boring not because of the fat jokes . Fat jokes dont bother me but seriously its old[/quote]

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144909 -

As i understand it, certain others (Spud being a primary example) have exceeded that limit.
When did it go into effect?

And Anno, all prejudices aside, you need to take a serious look at OTD moderation.
It is biased.


--------------------
"..all those molecules thrashing their kinky little tails, hot for destiny and the street."  Gibson


Nuke baby seals for Jesus!

(This has been a +1 production.)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Randolph_Carter]
    #4144917 -

Resistance is futile, hes just going to spew some crap about how you clicked i agree to the rules when you joined, and in that agreement it says you wont be overly offensive, i got the speech back in the doggysex avatar days.


--------------------



[quote]KristiMidocean said:
Good now thats clear.WHO FUCKING CARES. If I am fat u all keep pointing it out like its suppose to be a secret.LIke u really have nothing better to do then make fat jokes. If o know its like I do I know yall can come up with NEW AND BETTER SHIT . This shit is old and boring . I left in the first place cause this shit got boring not because of the fat jokes . Fat jokes dont bother me but seriously its old[/quote]

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144922 -

Anno said:
>Perma ban? Come on. Explain to me why, mod(s).

There is a system about how long the ban is.

Fist time: Warning

Second time: A few days ban.

Third time: 14 days ban.

Last time: permanent


Hankys last ban was for a month I believe, was he informed that his next ban would be permenant?

Why is the scat pic that SUPERBLUNT posted, which hanky only quoted still there? Why wasn't superblant banned? Here's the thread i mean....http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/4140884/an/0/page/0


--------------------
sadsappysucker said:
i want to ram my fat dick in hankys pooper



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Randolph_Carter]
    #4144924 -

>As i understand it, certain others (Spud being a primary example) have exceeded that limit.

Spud has been banned once for posting an offensive image in the Pub. Ban duration 14 days.
He is on thin ice, certainly.


--------------------
Grow Mushrooms from Spores - PF-Tek for Simple Minds

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144929 -

Can we trade spud for hanky?


--------------------



[quote]KristiMidocean said:
Good now thats clear.WHO FUCKING CARES. If I am fat u all keep pointing it out like its suppose to be a secret.LIke u really have nothing better to do then make fat jokes. If o know its like I do I know yall can come up with NEW AND BETTER SHIT . This shit is old and boring . I left in the first place cause this shit got boring not because of the fat jokes . Fat jokes dont bother me but seriously its old[/quote]

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144932 -

As for the scat picture - Hanky only quoted someone else who posted it. That same someone was caught last night for puppets - and low and behold - still posting away. That image is still there in the thread - I quoted it myself to point it out.

As for the chicken picture - how many other pictures of people doing unmentionable things to animals will I find if I do a search through OTD? More than the chicken one I can bet.

Whether you chose to believe it or not - moderation in OTD is biased. It's not what you know - its who you know.


--------------------
Prisoner#1:  Hanky doesn't send PMs to retards

UncleLuke:  That's not true.  Hanky has sent me a total of 3 PMs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144940 -

psoting an offensive image in the Pub?
As opposed to the pic(s) in OTD?
PGF got permabanned for a goatse in Spi&Phil.

I fail to see, in either case, where an editing and lay down the law warning would not have sufficed.
See the newuser bit for my opinion on those who ignore a serious warning.

I just see so many ways around the problem, especially in OTD. The decision to ban reeks.
And, no offense to you, but the decision to permaban is ridding the site of one of its more entertaining and noticable members.

Unless we're under some type of electronic eugenics program, i don't quite get it.


--------------------
"..all those molecules thrashing their kinky little tails, hot for destiny and the street."  Gibson


Nuke baby seals for Jesus!

(This has been a +1 production.)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Grizz]
    #4144943 -

I, personally, don't think that posting a picture of two naked hippies that are both consenting adults engaged in a private fetish that is--let's be honest--less offensive than some slaughterhouse work pictures, should be the last straw and the gateway to permabannaged. 

Admins, mods, I think that the popular response to this banning informs you of the general OTD community's opinion of this matter. 
True, you are here to keep us in check.  But, you also moderate the site as per the general consensus of what is "tasteful" or "tolerable."  Obviously, kiddie porn is disgusting. 

But a shitty pic of two relatively forgetable people with a chicken between them--there was no "chicken fuck" pic series--is going to get a user's account deleted? 

Come on, now.  We're all adults.  We're all over 18.  We're not advocating masturbating with the pelts of guinea pigs for the texture feel. 

I think this matter needs to be thought about in a dispassionate, clear way. 


:sun:


--------------------
Jerry Garcia. JERRY GARCIA! JERRY GARCIA!!!!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Randolph_Carter]
    #4144946 -

No PM was sent to Hanky. No warning was given. Nothing. I agree. An editing of the post would have sufficed. However that would have deprived certain people of the pleasure of banning Hanky I guess.

What is highly amusing is that the scat pic is still there.


--------------------
Prisoner#1:  Hanky doesn't send PMs to retards

UncleLuke:  That's not true.  Hanky has sent me a total of 3 PMs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Grizz]
    #4144955 -

Provide link.
If we are to discuss this matter, we need to provide a basis to dispute.


--------------------
"..all those molecules thrashing their kinky little tails, hot for destiny and the street."  Gibson


Nuke baby seals for Jesus!

(This has been a +1 production.)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: GnuBobo]
    #4144957 -

GnuBobo said:
I, personally, don't think that posting a picture of two naked hippies that are both consenting adults engaged in a private fetish that is--let's be honest--less offensive than some slaughterhouse work pictures, should be the last straw and the gateway to permabannaged.



Exactly. There have been multitudes of shock pics posted - even as recently as this week - that have been vile - yet left alone. One which comes to mind is the guy who was skinned. There have been quite a few others as well. There was also a pic the other week of someone screwing a horse - also a woman giving a dog a blow job. Again - these were left alone. Where is the consistancy? If the moderation was always the same then it would be a different matter - yet the up and down manner of which OTD is moderated reeks of favouritism and lack of being impartial.


--------------------
Prisoner#1:  Hanky doesn't send PMs to retards

UncleLuke:  That's not true.  Hanky has sent me a total of 3 PMs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Randolph_Carter]
    #4144965 -

>Unless we're under some type of electronic eugenics program, i don't quite get it.

This seems to be the case.

Again, nobody (except of an occasional spammer, scammer or puppet) gets a permanent ban out of blue on their first offense.
There has to be a history of repeated rule breaking for this to happen. As it is the case with hanky in this case.
He is neither the first nor probably the last person who pushed it this far. Some people just don't seem to know when to stop. And as long this is the case, there will be poeple who will get permabanned and there will be poeple who are going to complain about it.


--------------------
Grow Mushrooms from Spores - PF-Tek for Simple Minds

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Randolph_Carter]
    #4144966 -

http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat...rue#Post4144732

No doubt it will mysteriously dissapear shortly.

oh and note that a mod also had posted in that thread and didn't remove it.


--------------------
Prisoner#1:  Hanky doesn't send PMs to retards

UncleLuke:  That's not true.  Hanky has sent me a total of 3 PMs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144972 -

Which offense is he banned for Anno? The scat that someone else posted or 2 hippies getting friendly with a chicken?


--------------------
Prisoner#1:  Hanky doesn't send PMs to retards

UncleLuke:  That's not true.  Hanky has sent me a total of 3 PMs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Grizz]
    #4144979 -

He is permabanned for repeatedly posting pictures that are against the rules of either the OTD or the Pub.
The last one was the Man-Chicken-sex image.


--------------------
Grow Mushrooms from Spores - PF-Tek for Simple Minds

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Hankys ban? [Re: Anno]
    #4144985 -

Ok so if I go through and pull out ALL the shock pics posted by other users and all the animal sex act pics posted by other users are you going to ban those who have posted them also?


--------------------
Prisoner#1:  Hanky doesn't send PMs to retards

UncleLuke:  That's not true.  Hanky has sent me a total of 3 PMs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]

Shop: North Spore Bulk Substrate   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Bias bans
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 RoseM 10,928 93 12/07/05 03:18 PM
by Thor
* Doser(PUPPET) Alert! Teragon 1,573 14 02/14/05 02:46 PM
by Society
* y was my freind banned notapillow 1,827 11 12/01/03 08:51 PM
by geokills
* E-Chode Banned?!?!?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 muse_sick 5,260 80 09/15/05 02:36 AM
by Thor
* Ban Lottery Trophy???? Hanky 702 2 09/07/06 05:25 PM
by Anno
* Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )		 Irishdrunk 11,277 143 05/11/05 10:17 AM
by Thor
* Please ban me again... or answer my questions... RoseM 3,060 16 01/18/06 12:38 AM
by geokills
* abusing the ban button AGAIN blowragjoe 1,279 12 08/31/05 02:14 AM
by geokills

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Ythan, Thor, Seuss, geokills
6,078 topic views. 1 members, 70 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 15 queries.