Quote:
RANDALFLAGG said:
.
when it comes to the survival, defense, and retribution of my nation, I view any actions as being pretty much acceptable
.
I think that Khalid Sheik Mohammed (currently in U.S. custody) should be released into Times Square in New York City where the city residents can do whatever they want to him.
.
I think that confirmed members of Al Qaeda should be horrendously tortured.
.
I would slather them in pig grease and put them in a cage with mean hungry dogs and then I would probably slice off their limbs with chainsaws. I would send the videotape to Al Jazeera for the sole purpose of scaring all of the Arabs and Muslims that were watching.
.
I don't think (?) disqualifies me from being dictator of the United States.
.
I don't think that the U.S. gains any power by propping up governments over there. We get only heat and condemnation from the rest of the world. We take all of the heat to ensure that the oil continues to flow for all of the world's consumers.
.
In fact I said how America owes them an apology for the ample meddling that has taken place. However, I still think that once this apology and change of behavior takes place, a blunt message of fearsome retaliation should be given if there were to be any further aggressions by Muslim extremists.
.
I don't think it is out of line to give a warning to the entire Arab and Muslim world.
.
If a certain group of people wants to destroy you or sympathizes with people who want to destroy you, then you discriminate against them if you want to survive.`
.
>>And how many Muslims and Arabs have been killed by the U.S. occupation of Iraq?
I have seen estimates ranging from 10,000 to 50,000. It could be argued that by getting rid of Saddam the sanctions could be lifted and therefore lives would be saved in the long run.
While it is terrible that it appears as if that many people have died, the tactics used by both sides are completely different. When an innocent Muslim dies because of U.S. actions, it is a mistake. During many instances when a Muslim decides to go on a holy martyrdom mission, he intentionally targets innocent people.
.
My reason to distrust Muslims and their intentions is not personal. It is a valid response to a group of people that seem to be hostile to my people and my country. I merely examine reality and respond accordingly.
.
There are a lot of Muslims out there who hate my country and my culture. Some of them are actively trying to kill me.
.
Thank God I am on the side of the bomb.
.
7. With Saddam gone the U.S. government can pull troops out of Saudi Arabia without looking wimpy. Having American troops in Saudi Arabia (which houses the holiest sites of Islam) is one of the main reasons that Muslims hate the U.S.
8. The Middle East is notorious for inspiring cultures that respect power. By taking out a blatantly hostile leader, we send a message to the Middle East in general??Don?t mess with us?.
.
I only want to torture people who involve themselves in the planning or execution of terrorist attacks against civilians. They deserve it.
.
>>You are calling for a lynching mob.
Yes, I am.
.
When it comes to terrorists who have killed or planned to kill innocent people, I think much worse things should happen to them than what happened at Abu Graihb and Guantanamo.
.
I would not abolish the right for American citizens to vote or to have civil rights. However, I would abolish human rights for terrorists.
.
>>Why do most people in other countries that have been hit by Al Qaeda don't share your >>views? Look at Spain for example.
I have no clue. I don?t give a shit what they think. I care about what I think.
.
I think Muslims should be watched. I think the more extreme Muslims should be very closely scrutinized. And, I think that Muslims who have planned or acted out violence against innocent American civilians should be tortured and killed.
.
Arabs are for the most part Muslim and they are the most prevalent race in the Middle East.
.
If the people abused and tortured at Abu Ghraib deserved it, then I don't feel bad.
.
I affirm mob action against terrible scumbags who murder innocent people.
.
I am of the opinion that when you deal with savages, you have to be savage.
You started the thread with: Am I a Fascist?
I can't discern that because I lack a few statements characteristic of the definition of Fascism, even though the rest of the criteria are firmly established.
Are you a racist?
Even though you are of the opinion that there is such a thing as an Arab Race (would that be black or asian?) technically they mostly belong to the white race and since you extend it to others who are not of middle-eastern descent, there are many things in your thread that are arguably racist-extremist, but I can not apply that term positively.
Are you a psychopath/sociopath as defined by DSM IV?
Probably not. Some of your statements in other threads pretty much rule that out.
Then what are you?
Dangerous.
If a leader of a nation held and acted upon the convictions you just vented, then by your own definitions he should be put to gruesome death.
Suppose you swapped the words in your posting. Suppose every time you said "American" we swap that for Middle-Eastern and vice versa, and let's suppose we live in Iraq and consider the US invasion as "trespassing on private property for the purpose of killing scores of thousands of men, women and children and city-bombing" Let's say that you, as that simple Iraqi farmer who has seen the torn-off limbs of his loved ones rotting all around the place, consider that war a terrorist act which killed scores of thousands of civilians who were not government officials.
If you swapped the notion of who is the terrorist, then you are a political extremist, a "Capitalist fundamentalist" who unfolds his plans for murder, indiscriminate xenophobic violence and torture in a public place gripped by the delusion that he is Justified to such an extent that he cannot imagine to be wrong.
If you want to see a fundamentalist extremist, take a long hard look at your post.
If a nation is led by a person who has that degree of radicalism in his rethoric and policy then it is arguably the duty of the people of that nation to remove that leader from office themselves by any means effective, preferably through nonviolent means.
That should've been done to Saddam in the first place. The army and people of Iraq should've removed Saddam from power and then scores of thousands of people would not have been killed.
In fact: the US could've selectively taken Saddam out, by dropping a MOAB on his beanie when his satellite-visible 100 man escort was taking him from A to B. But.. they chose to kill scores of thousands of people who were not active part of the regime.
Randalflagg, you can supply statements such as "I think much worse things should happen to them than what happened at Abu Graihb and Guantanamo." and justify them with a thousand statements like: "I don?t give a shit what they think. I care about what I think." but you have made up your mind and will not be swayed by discussion to the contrary.
We don't -have- to argue with you. All we have to do as human beings and/or americans is to make sure you never become president, and if you do, to remove you from office by any means effective, preferably nonviolent.
.
--------------------
Omnicyclion.org
personal empowerment for the world
Onehomemission.org
truly make a difference
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Spores for European Microscopy 
Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale, Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale 
Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order
Asante
zahudulallah 
[Re: 
Edit 
Reply 
You call me uncivilized for wanting to punish people who intentionally try to kill innocent civilians? What about the terrorists themselves? Are they uncivilized? 
1 2 all )
Psilocybeingzz
luvdemshrooms
usefulidiot
EchoVortex
Evolving
rogue_pixie
DoctorJ