Bi0TeK said:

translated version:

UN getuige in lawsuit concerning paddo's
by koen Voskuil

AMSTERDAM - falls hallucinating mushrooms (paddo's) under the Opium Act and are them illegal, or correctly not? That is today the commitment in the higher profession matter of Smartshop sjamaan for the Court of Justice in Den Bosch. For the first time in the many years' legal fight concerning the legaliteit of paddo's the vice-president of international Narcotics Control board (INCB), the drug body of the United Nations (VN), explanation comes give.

The Supreme Court judged in 2002, that paddo's in dried form fall under psychotropic substances Treaty of the UN, and with that under the Opium Act. A remarkable decision, thus found the INCB, which disputed the decision of the Supreme Court openly. In a new lawsuit of Smartshop sjamaan from Arnhem the INCB will spend today for the first time an explanation or mushrooms on the list of psychotropic substances at home to hear. Sjamaan, who is assisted by the from Amsterdam sentence suitor Ad?le van der Plas, hopes that the Court of Justice in Den Bosch Paddo's explains legal. We have the decision of the Supreme Court that path dos under psychotropic substances Treaty always fall contested. We are ourselves with vice-directeur of the INCB now in good company'', thus Van der Plas.

Owner Ananda schouten of sjamaan: paddo's are total inoffensive for health. That has already rather expelled a Dutch research of the CAN. Recent is that also become clear from a report of the psychiatric university hospital of Z?rich. We will try that with reports and prove witnesses.' '

Appeared in (daily papers) SPITS on Wednesday 16 February 2005.

---

Still a few gramar mistakes, but thats too much work to fix.