Sulfurshelfsean said:

I'm trying to figure out why he acts like trying to force a regime change in Iran for Israel is somehow news, or some type of secret. Or that the name of the operation is some crazy double entendre with hidden meaning.

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

It’s almost like his 9,000 arguments are intellectually dishonest and thus he can’t let people see the proof that should help his argument.

---

Your weakness is showing, and like a shark catching a scent of the blood of a wounded animal, I'm not done with you yet.

You don't debate. You just name-call. It's quite literally the ultimate sign of weakness, and nobody even comes close to rivaling you. You don't have what it takes to step up. You should just roll over and give up, because you're never going to win with these pathetic half-assed jabs. I've dealt with people exponentially more clever than you. Child. If you had any ammo at all, you could point to something specific I've said and engage me on it. The reason you don't is because even then, you'd still be obliterated. It would just be so much more obvious.

You have unequivocally demonstrated to the class you don't have the mental acuity to bring anything substantial to the table whatsoever.

Sit down and let Sensei handle the class. I've no time for little dogs that only know how to bark and not bite.

---

Oh man you know he's in his element when the weeb shit starts flowing. Nothing you're saying is new to anyone. You're like chicken little running around going "oh my god they're trying to manufacture consent!" And everyone around you already knows it. The only caveat to your dumb shit that's different from most is you're making excuses about how this is gonna be different from all the other times we've gone into the middle east trying to "spread freedom". Your sources are just links to people's opinions on x. And one of your links has Kash Patel saying that "there are files with alot of accusations in them". Nothing about evidence just accusations. You attribute way more weight to this type of "evidence" than it could ever deserve. This is why no one takes you seriously. Professor Sean, out.

---

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

It’s almost like his 9,000 arguments are intellectually dishonest and thus he can’t let people see the proof that should help his argument.

---

Your weakness is showing, and like a shark catching a scent of the blood of a wounded animal, I'm not done with you yet.

You don't debate. You just name-call. It's quite literally the ultimate sign of weakness, and nobody even comes close to rivaling you. You don't have what it takes to step up. You should just roll over and give up, because you're never going to win with these pathetic half-assed jabs. I've dealt with people exponentially more clever than you. Child. If you had any ammo at all, you could point to something specific I've said and engage me on it. The reason you don't is because even then, you'd still be obliterated. It would just be so much more obvious.

You have unequivocally demonstrated to the class you don't have the mental acuity to bring anything substantial to the table whatsoever.

Sit down and let Sensei handle the class. I've no time for little dogs that only know how to bark and not bite.

---

christopera said:

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

It’s almost like his 9,000 arguments are intellectually dishonest and thus he can’t let people see the proof that should help his argument.

---

Your weakness is showing, and like a shark catching a scent of the blood of a wounded animal, I'm not done with you yet.

You don't debate. You just name-call. It's quite literally the ultimate sign of weakness, and nobody even comes close to rivaling you. You don't have what it takes to step up. You should just roll over and give up, because you're never going to win with these pathetic half-assed jabs. I've dealt with people exponentially more clever than you. Child. If you had any ammo at all, you could point to something specific I've said and engage me on it. The reason you don't is because even then, you'd still be obliterated. It would just be so much more obvious.

You have unequivocally demonstrated to the class you don't have the mental acuity to bring anything substantial to the table whatsoever.

Sit down and let Sensei handle the class. I've no time for little dogs that only know how to bark and not bite.

---

I won’t hold my breath.

---

FoolOfElysium said:

Sulfurshelfsean said:

I'm trying to figure out why he acts like trying to force a regime change in Iran for Israel is somehow news, or some type of secret. Or that the name of the operation is some crazy double entendre with hidden meaning.

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

It’s almost like his 9,000 arguments are intellectually dishonest and thus he can’t let people see the proof that should help his argument.

---

Your weakness is showing, and like a shark catching a scent of the blood of a wounded animal, I'm not done with you yet.

You don't debate. You just name-call. It's quite literally the ultimate sign of weakness, and nobody even comes close to rivaling you. You don't have what it takes to step up. You should just roll over and give up, because you're never going to win with these pathetic half-assed jabs. I've dealt with people exponentially more clever than you. Child. If you had any ammo at all, you could point to something specific I've said and engage me on it. The reason you don't is because even then, you'd still be obliterated. It would just be so much more obvious.

You have unequivocally demonstrated to the class you don't have the mental acuity to bring anything substantial to the table whatsoever.

Sit down and let Sensei handle the class. I've no time for little dogs that only know how to bark and not bite.

---

Oh man you know he's in his element when the weeb shit starts flowing. Nothing you're saying is new to anyone. You're like chicken little running around going "oh my god they're trying to manufacture consent!" And everyone around you already knows it. The only caveat to your dumb shit that's different from most is you're making excuses about how this is gonna be different from all the other times we've gone into the middle east trying to "spread freedom". Your sources are just links to people's opinions on x. And one of your links has Kash Patel saying that "there are files with alot of accusations in them". Nothing about evidence just accusations. You attribute way more weight to this type of "evidence" than it could ever deserve. This is why no one takes you seriously. Professor Sean, out.

---

Did you literally just say, "weeb shit?"

---

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

It’s almost like his 9,000 arguments are intellectually dishonest and thus he can’t let people see the proof that should help his argument.

---

Your weakness is showing, and like a shark catching a scent of the blood of a wounded animal, I'm not done with you yet.

You don't debate. You just name-call. It's quite literally the ultimate sign of weakness, and nobody even comes close to rivaling you. You don't have what it takes to step up. You should just roll over and give up, because you're never going to win with these pathetic half-assed jabs. I've dealt with people exponentially more clever than you. Child. If you had any ammo at all, you could point to something specific I've said and engage me on it. The reason you don't is because even then, you'd still be obliterated. It would just be so much more obvious.

You have unequivocally demonstrated to the class you don't have the mental acuity to bring anything substantial to the table whatsoever.

Sit down and let Sensei handle the class. I've no time for little dogs that only know how to bark and not bite.

---

I won’t hold my breath.

---

Highly recommend you don't either. You spit so much bullshit you need all the time you can to gasp for air in between.

---

So no proof, again.

Quote:

So no proof, again.

---

christopera said:

Only you are willing to believe that you don’t need proof.

---

Quote:

I hope one day you find yourself being accused of something and the only evidence against you is a bunch of tweets about accusations from four years ago.

---

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

Only you are willing to believe that you don’t need proof.

---

Personally not a fan of sucking the cock of the mainstream media, but you do you.

---

christopera said:

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

Only you are willing to believe that you don’t need proof.

---

Personally not a fan of sucking the cock of the mainstream media, but you do you.

---

Proof that I’m sucking the cock in the mainstream media or did you make that up too?

---

FoolOfElysium said:

Quote:

I hope one day you find yourself being accused of something and the only evidence against you is a bunch of tweets about accusations from four years ago.

---

Ladies and gentleman, this right here is exactly why you're on the wrong side of history.

Thank fucking god Kamala Harris didn't win 2024.

---

Sulfurshelfsean said:

FoolOfElysium said:

Quote:

I hope one day you find yourself being accused of something and the only evidence against you is a bunch of tweets about accusations from four years ago.

---

Ladies and gentleman, this right here is exactly why you're on the wrong side of history.

Thank fucking god Kamala Harris didn't win 2024.

---

This just goes to show you have no faith in your arguments. You know that if a lawyer was pressing charges against you and using the same level of evidence that you use for your arguments in here, it would be a fucking joke. Idk what Kamala Harris has to do with how weak your arguments are. I wasn't going to votee for her anyway so whatever that argument was, that's right out the window.

I've seen alot of great arguments on here and I've seen even more great bad faith arguments. Yours are neither. I feel like you'd submit an adjournment in as evidence at a courthouse.

Your honor my evidence, is, just wait a little bit longer ...

---

Sulfurshelfsean said:

No shit a professional manipulator? It makes sense now.

---