Home | Community | Message Board

Marijuana Demystified
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
2 articles on Iran
    #3235223 - 10/09/04 02:22 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

Holy Fuckstick Batman! The Iranians love us and everyone wants to get together and play naked twister. For those of you who are new to this, don't forget the wesson oil.


Those Friendly Iranians

New York Times
Published: May 5, 2004


Finally, I've found a pro-American country.

Everywhere I've gone in Iran, with one exception, people have been exceptionally friendly and fulsome in their praise for the United States, and often for President Bush as well. Even when I was detained a couple of days ago in the city of Isfahan for asking a group of young people whether they thought the Islamic revolution had been a mistake (they did), the police were courteous and let me go after an apology.

They apologized; I didn't.

On my first day in Tehran, I dropped by the "Den of Spies," as the old U.S. Embassy is now called. It's covered with ferocious murals denouncing America as the "Great Satan" and the "archvillain of nations" and showing the Statue of Liberty as a skull (tour the "Den of Spies" here).

Then I stopped to chat with one of the Revolutionary Guards now based in the complex. He was a young man who quickly confessed that his favorite movie is "Titanic." "If I could manage it, I'd go to America tomorrow," he said wistfully.

He paused and added, "To hell with the mullahs."

In the 1960's and 1970's, the U.S. spent millions backing a pro-Western modernizing shah ? and the result was an outpouring of venom that led to our diplomats' being held hostage. Since then, Iran has been ruled by mullahs who despise everything we stand for ? and now people stop me in the bazaar to offer paeans to America as well as George Bush.

Partly because being pro-American is a way to take a swipe at the Iranian regime, anything American, from blue jeans to "Baywatch," is revered. At the bookshops, Hillary Clinton gazes out from three different pirated editions of her autobiography.

`It's a best seller, though it's not selling as well as Harry Potter," said Heidar Danesh, a bookseller in Tehran. "The other best-selling authors are John Grisham, Sidney Sheldon, Danielle Steel."

Young Iranians keep popping the question, "So how can I get to the U.S.?" I ask why they want to go to a nation denounced for its "disgustingly sick promiscuous behavior," but that turns out to be a main attraction. And many people don't believe a word of the Iranian propaganda.

"We've learned to interpret just the opposite of things on TV because it's all lies," said Odan Seyyid Ashrafi, a 20-year-old university student. "So if it says America is awful, maybe that means it's a great place to live."

Indeed, many Iranians seem convinced that the U.S. military ventures in Afghanistan and Iraq are going great, and they say this with more conviction than your average White House spokesman.

One opinion poll showed that 74 percent of Iranians want a dialogue with the U.S. ? and the finding so irritated the authorities that they arrested the pollster. Iran is also the only Muslim country I know where citizens responded to the 9/11 attacks with a spontaneous candlelight vigil as a show of sympathy.

Iran-U.S. relations are now headed for a crisis over Tehran's nuclear program, which appears to be so advanced that Iran could produce its first bomb by the end of next year. The Bush administration is right to address this issue, but it needs to step very carefully to keep from inflaming Iranian nationalism and uniting the population behind the regime. We need to lay out the evidence on satellite television programs that are broadcast into Iran, emphasizing that the regime is squandering money on a nuclear weapons program that will further isolate Iranians and damage their economy.

Left to its own devices, the Islamic revolution is headed for collapse, and there is a better chance of a strongly pro-American democratic government in Tehran in a decade than in Baghdad. The ayatollahs' best hope is that hard-liners in Washington will continue their inept diplomacy, creating a wave of Iranian nationalism that bolsters the regime ? as happened to a lesser degree after President Bush put Iran in the axis of evil.

Oh, that one instance when I was treated inhospitably? That was in a teahouse near the Isfahan bazaar, where I was interviewing religious conservatives. They were warm and friendly, but a group of people two tables away went out of their way to be rude, yelling at me for being an American propagandist. So I finally encountered hostility in Iran ? from a table full of young Europeans.


{b]Iran at the tipping point

Jonah Goldberg
October 4th, 2004

I'm ashamed of myself. I haven't written a word about Iran in years, and Iran may be the most important story no one is talking about.

I shouldn't say no one. Michael Ledeen, my colleague at National Review Online and the holder of the Freedom Chair at the American Enterprise Institute, has been writing about Iran with a constancy his fans call Churchillian and his enemies call deranged. Ledeen is convinced, as are numerous Iranian activists and exiles, that Iran is poised for a democratic revolution.

Tehran, the nation's capital, as well as several other cities have been wracked in recent days with widespread anti-government protests and violent crackdowns by government forces. Buildings have been set ablaze, and exiles are calling for revolution. According to reports on Activistchat.com, a Web site dedicated to freeing Iran from the oppressive rule of the mullahs, numerous protestors have been killed. Ledeen - who has many sources inside Iran and out - reports that the roundups and executions of young men have picked up at a terrific pace. Iran has staged 120 public hangings since March alone, according to the government's own news agency.

The unpopularity of the mullahs, primarily with the younger, Western-oriented generation, is causing panic inside the regime. The appeal of revolutionary theocracy has been bled dry. The Christian Science Monitor reported - some would say "reluctantly reported" - that discontent with the regime and a desire for "change" according to various "polls" equals 90 percent. And we all remember those famous soccer games where Iranian fans chanted "USA! USA!"

Even if this weren't such a powerful human interest story, it would still be appalling how completely the mainstream media have downplayed what could be one of the most important news stories of our lives. If Iran were to throw off the shackles of the mullahocracy in favor of anything like a sane, decent and democratic regime, it would be the most significant advance for freedom and decency since the fall of the Berlin Wall. It would be a national security victory of staggering proportions.

So here's why we should all be ashamed we haven't paid more attention to this situation: The only way Iranian regime change will ever come about is if we - Americans, Europeans, the West - want it to. By ignoring the story, the press is in effect lending its support to the corrupt theocrats ruling Iran. One can't help but think this story is particularly inconvenient to those who think no good could ever come, even as a partial result, of the president's foreign policy.

That's especially the case for our enemies and "friends" in the Middle East who are invested in the continuation of tyranny, terrorism and the status quo. It's not that the Iranian Shiite regime is particularly popular with Arabs or Sunnis or its neighbors in general. But the collapse of that theocracy at the hands the Iranian street would deal a crippling blow to Islamists everywhere, proving that what normal Muslims want is freedom, prosperity and normalcy, not righteous totalitarianism.

Moreover, Iran is Al-Qaida's best friend - and probably the Iraqi insurgency's, too. The Iranians have been sowing discord in Iraq since before Saddam's ouster, and an end to their mischief would go a long way toward stabilizing Iraq. It would also have a profound teaching effect on the entire region that democratic change is inevitable and that everyone should get onboard the freedom train.

There's no end to the potential upside to a democratic transition - even a bloody one - in Iran. The Iranians could no longer give safe harbor to leaders of Al-Qaida or support terrorist attacks on U.S. interests. And, oh yeah, it might stop Iran from procuring nuclear weapons.

It may be necessary to use military force to remove the nuclear threat from the Iranians, but it would be a colossal mistake for America to see the nuclear issue as the only thing driving American policy - or, for that matter, to regard military force the best tool of American policy. Critics of the Bush Doctrine and the Iraq war complain, almost entirely disingenuously, that Iran and North Korea were bigger threats to America than Iraq. That's debatable at best. What is irrefutable, however, is that Iraq was an easier target than either Iran or North Korea.

When the rebels attacked the Death Star in "Star Wars," there was a reason they attacked at the battle station's weakest point. Iraq was the Axis of Evil's weakest point. The hope for many of us was that toppling Saddam would set off a chain reaction that would bring the whole thing down.

That can still happen. Critics who lament "instability" in the Middle East miss the point entirely. Instability - the right kind of instability - is exactly what we want. The signs are that the Iranian regime is coming apart. Whether it's inches or miles from the tipping point is impossible to tell. But what is obvious is that without the West's active pressure on the mullahs, and even more active support of the freedom fighters, the tipping point may never come.

So please, start paying attention. I will.


Tastes just like chicken

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
prophet of God
 User Gallery

Registered: 09/05/04
Posts: 953
Re: 2 articles on Iran [Re: JesusChrist]
    #3236089 - 10/09/04 12:27 PM (13 years, 7 months ago)

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
Re: 2 articles on Iran [Re: Great_Satan]
    #3237630 - 10/09/04 11:37 PM (13 years, 7 months ago)

"When we invade Iran, we will be greeted as liberators." J.H. Christ

Maybe their is something to the Bush Doctrine of spreading freedom. If Iran does have a revolution, I am sure the left will instantly claim that it would have happened anyway. Right now they are looking at having a free Afganistan to the east and a free Iraq to the West.

The Iranians are probably very happy that terrorists are converging on Iraq because that means they are leaving their own country. I find it interesting that Iran is one of the few countries out their with pro American sentiment among the populace. That is very encouraging.

In 10 years, might we have a free Middle East? If that is the case, history will look very kindly on George W. Bush. He could go down as one of the great ones. What if he actually is right?

And what would be the ramifications for North Korea if other rouge nations reformed? Being the last guy on the block holding out against freedom isn't a very tenable position in my opinion.

Tastes just like chicken

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 30,656
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 18 minutes, 51 seconds
Re: 2 articles on Iran [Re: JesusChrist]
    #3237732 - 10/10/04 12:24 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

Maybe we should invade even more nations. That would make Bush look even greater in the long run.


Mp3 of the month: Hydro Pyro - Id

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
Re: 2 articles on Iran [Re: Learyfan]
    #3237848 - 10/10/04 01:27 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

yeah, I mean fuck. the US should just bomb and invaded every fucking nation. Total Empire Now!

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
Re: 2 articles on Iran [Re: Vvellum]
    #3238165 - 10/10/04 03:34 AM (13 years, 7 months ago)

The beauty is that it looks like we won't have to invade them if you read the articles. And I thought you lefties liked revolution.

Tastes just like chicken

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
( 1 2 all )
Mklangelo 2,185 29 01/08/02 01:41 PM
by wingnutx
* Faked documents, embarassed Americans.
( 1 2 3 all )
Phluck 1,967 44 04/01/03 07:53 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* General Strike Set in Iran In Bid To Topple Mullahs wingnutx 835 18 06/14/03 07:02 PM
by hongomon
* Peace Prize Is Awarded To Iranian wingnutx 658 2 10/11/03 11:03 PM
by wingnutx
* Iran Will Allow U.N. Inspections of Nuclear Sites Zahid 576 3 10/23/03 01:50 AM
by Zahid
* those iranians... Anonymous 285 1 11/04/03 11:00 PM
by Zahid
* Iran: More Talk, Less Action Zahid 283 0 10/21/03 02:21 AM
by Zahid
* Wonder if Iran will comply. Iran 'violating nuclear treaty' Anonymous 750 10 05/09/03 03:26 PM
by tekramrepus

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
818 topic views. 6 members, 0 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Vesp.co, Inc.
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.02 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 16 queries.