Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Myyco.com APE Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
from homo sapiens to pan sapiens
    #4785890 -

do you accept evolution as fact? if so, it is logical to accept that humans should be renamed to pan sapiens (pan being the genus for chimpanzee's and bonobos) obviously, any other two creatures that share 98% of their DNA should and are, placed in the same genus. why was this done? because the system (and names for humans) was created in 1735. the taxonomic tree has been shaken up many times since then but the naming of humans has never been changed. i think it's high time it was changed. the idea that man has some god given right to do as he pleases on this planet is the reason we have created a seperate genus (and even family!) for ourselves. We are part of the system. changing our name to better reflect that will, i believe, assist in the mindset change required to stop our blind rush to environmental disaster.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens to wok sapiens. [Re: psychomime]
    #4785910 -

with the popularity of asian cuisine I think that we can do better than pan sapiens,
how 'bout wok sapiens.
we should definitely wok
before we run amok


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: psychomime]
    #4785942 -

98%? We don't even have the same number a chromosomes as chimpanzees.

Doesn't homo come from Hominidae? (= any of various anthropoid apes of the family Pongidae, which includes the chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. - answers.com)

We are very different from primates because of our brain, I think that's more important than the % of matching DNA.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: Annom]
    #4785997 -

Annom said:
98%? We don't even have the same number a chromosomes as chimpanzees.

Doesn't homo come from Hominidae? (= any of various anthropoid apes of the family Pongidae, which includes the chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. - answers.com)

We are very different from primates because of our brain, I think that's more important than the % of matching DNA.



humans have 23 chromosomes chimps 24. there is evidence that humans have 2 fused chromosomes. human/chimp DNA is 98.5%-95% similar. even at 95% it is still abundantly clear that we belong in the same genus. we are slightly closer to the bonobo, pan paniscus.I was in error regarding the family name, you are correct that the great apes are included. however, the issue around genus classification remains.

having different brains doesn't change anything. genetic similarity is the criteria for modern taxonomic classification.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: psychomime]
    #4786019 -

agreed, our brains differ in degree, not kind


--------------------
"consensus on the nature of equilibrium is usually established by periodic conflict." -henry kissinger

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: psychomime]
    #4786022 -

Ah ok.

I just found this (here: http://www.learner.org/channel/courses/essential/life/session2/closer4.html ), classification of the homo sapiens:

Order - Primates - High level of intelligence
Family - Hominidae - Walk upright
Genus - Homo - Human
Species - H. sapiens - Modern human

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: psychomime]
    #4787209 -

If we evolved from the apes.. why are the apes, still here???

can you say "common ancestry" !? :P hahaha

YES. I am talking to my self.. :wink:


--------------------


--------------------
Disclaimer!?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: Gomp] * 1
    #4788412 -

because apes occupy an ecological niche that they are already well adapted to.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: crunchytoast]
    #4788434 -

exactly! we are animals and work similarly to other animals. the same rules apply to us with regards to carrying capacity, resource availabilty and habitat destruction. we should not allow ourselves to fall into a false sense of security by assuming our brains exempt us from the rules of ecology.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: from homo sapiens to pan sapiens [Re: psychomime] * 1
    #28825632 -

Stamp of appproval

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Myyco.com APE Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Homo Sapien 2Experimental 1,100 8 04/16/04 07:39 AM
by Anonymous
* Homo sapiens Ravus 698 17 08/18/05 02:16 PM
by Icelander
* The very first homo sapiens
( 1 2 all )
OrgoneConclusion 1,876 34 06/03/11 03:00 PM
by johnm214
* why homo-sapien is weird
( 1 2 all )
bedetached 1,755 21 05/17/04 09:19 PM
by Mushmonkey
* Human Origins SkorpivoMusterion 1,414 7 09/19/03 11:34 AM
by Seuss
* A spiritual take on human origins gettinjiggywithit 1,583 8 08/23/05 01:43 AM
by Bobo
* Christopher Hitchens and the afterlife
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Sophistic Radiance 4,304 97 12/19/11 09:15 PM
by Sophistic Radiance
* homo vs. gay
( 1 2 all )
thedudenj 2,516 30 05/03/09 09:35 PM
by thedudenj

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,420 topic views. 1 members, 1,019 guests and 36 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.