DisoRDeR said:

Eventually we all fall down

A mass grave is apulling--it makes us matter less

---

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off.

sudly said:

DisoRDeR said:

Eventually we all fall down

A mass grave is apulling--it makes us matter less

---

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off.

---

shattered and torn in to pieces.
 

redgreenvines said:

gravity itself.

---

Quote:

In the 1920s, astronomers including Georges Lemaître and Edwin Hubble found that most galaxies exhibit such a redshift — and that the redshift was greater for more distant galaxies. From these observations, they deduced that the Universe must be expanding.

Doppler Effect is.. as the effect of a car driving past you. As the car approaches you the sound it produces is higher pitched than when it drives away from you, where the sound becomes lower in pitch. In contrast, when the sound source moves towards you the wavelength decreases and the frequency of the sound increases (higher pitch). When the sound source moves away from you the wavelength increases and the frequency of the sound decreases (lower pitch).
Meanwhile, when the light from a galaxy which is moving away from you is observed, the wavelength of the observed light appears longer, it moves towards the red end of the spectrum. This is called RED SHIFT
http://physicsnet.co.uk/gcse-physics/red-shift/

---

Quote:

Later time A Cosmologist, however, claimed that the universe might not be expanding at all. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/17/universe-expanding-cosmologist_n_3606136.html

recently, international scientists were presenting evidences that contradicted the idea of Doppler and Hubble that Red Shift implies stars and galaxies are going farther from each other, therefore suggesting an ever expanding universe.
So in an expanding Universe the most distant galaxies should have hundreds of times dimmer surface brightness than similar nearby galaxies, making them actually undetectable with present-day telescopes.
But that is not what observations show, as demonstrated by this new study published in the International Journal of Modern Physics D.
The scientists carefully compared the size and brightness of about a thousand nearby and extremely distant galaxies. They chose the most luminous spiral galaxies for comparisons, matching the average luminosity of the near and far samples.
Contrary to the prediction of the Big Bang theory, they found that the surface brightnesses of the near and far galaxies are identical.
These results are consistent with what would be expected from ordinary geometry if the Universe was not expanding, and are in contradiction with the drastic dimming of surface brightness predicted by the expanding Universe hypothesis.
http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/science-universe-not-expanding-01940.html

In concordant of that from the last update from Stephen Hawkin.
Professor Hawking's last work suggests that idea of eternal inflation is wrong.
Einstein’s theory breaks down in eternal inflation.”
In fact, the universe is a rather more simple and smooth than previously thought, the study suggests.
“We predict that our universe, on the largest scales, is reasonably smooth and globally finite. So it is not a fractal structure,” said Professor Hawking
https://www.google.com.ph/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-death-final-paper-universe-multiverse-black-hole-study-a8332936.html%3famp

---

redgreenvines said:

inertia against where we were relative to another dimension

---

Yellow Pants said:

If it’s from an infinite singularity it is more like a deflation.  Things are cooling, slowing down.  I really have no idea tho.  Seems the astrophysicist is always correcting himself

---

Kickle said:

I don't think it's fair to say gravity built the universe.

---

hTx said:

The very early universe consisted of mostly uniform hydrogen, the very first and most simple element on the periodic table.

---