Seriously_trippin said:

Necropolis said:

Seriously_trippin said:

wwaaaaaaahhhh I'm a liberal waaaahhhhh

---

Guess I struck a nerve by posting my opinions and articles with opinions from experts on the subject that agree with me.

---

Lol I was actually trying to have dialogue dude,stop melting snowflake we are chill.

I gave my opinion about it but doesn't it really come down to neither of us know because the investigation isn't complete?

Also, I read your article after you mentioned (some of which is questionable imo) it and the point is that just because this wasn't successful working bombs doesn't mean this isn't violence that is terroristic act. Bomb scares like this is tantamount to telling someone I'm going to kill you and can kill you at any time and leaving .

If someone had a gun to ur head and said that and left without killing you that is a threat against your life and you'd be scared for your life. Also he/she either was bad at makes bombs and found some internet how to and fucked it up. Or they wanted to look so real to scare these people in the way I mentioned.

---

Necropolis said:

Seriously_trippin said:

Necropolis said:

Seriously_trippin said:

wwaaaaaaahhhh I'm a liberal waaaahhhhh

---

Guess I struck a nerve by posting my opinions and articles with opinions from experts on the subject that agree with me.

---

Lol I was actually trying to have dialogue dude,stop melting snowflake we are chill.

I gave my opinion about it but doesn't it really come down to neither of us know because the investigation isn't complete?

Also, I read your article after you mentioned (some of which is questionable imo) it and the point is that just because this wasn't successful working bombs doesn't mean this isn't violence that is terroristic act. Bomb scares like this is tantamount to telling someone I'm going to kill you and can kill you at any time and leaving .

If someone had a gun to ur head and said that and left without killing you that is a threat against your life and you'd be scared for your life. Also he/she either was bad at makes bombs and found some internet how to and fucked it up. Or they wanted to look so real to scare these people in the way I mentioned.

---

Actually, this is a little more serious than that. And whoever has been doing this stuff, needs to be caught. Regardless of what side they're on.

---

Necropolis said:

koods said:

Holy shit dude. Please stop. You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about when it comes to electrical circuits.

---

Quote:

Fireworks mortars are two-stage; the round section contains the main explosives that produce the sky effects; the lower cylindrical section contains a propellant charge to launch them into the air. Since the propellant must go off first, the fuse attaches at the side of the propellant section near the bottom of the mortar. Yet the wires are attached to the top of the mortars and no fuse is visible.

Electricity is not an efficient way to set off a fireworks mortar. They use a fairly primitive, low-power type of black powder, which is activated by a spark or heat from a fuse. In order for an electrical current to set off the mortar, it would have to be substantial enough to activate the powder by heat. The type of clock attached may include an alarm function, but the current level is minuscule (a few microamps). I know this from experience; one of my early projects was a similar clock used to energize a gong to wake me up in time for work. It took several stages of amplification circuitry as well as a separate power supply, to do that. The power needed in this case would be at least as great as what I used for that gong, and probably more.

Two wires are used, but they go to separate mortars on each end of the device. In order to ignite the mortar, even if there was enough power, both wires would be needed at each mortar to create a circuit, or there would have to be a heating element connected internally. If there were such a heating element, the mortars would be superfluous.

A pipe bomb works by holding in the pressure of the explosion until it builds to a point sufficient to rupture the pipe. The stronger the pipe, the stronger the blast. PVC is a very inefficient material for a pipe bomb, because it has a ow yield strength and will literally melt from the ignition itself before high pressure can be obtained. It will work, but poorly.

---

Care to explain how I'm wrong? Didn't think so.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1222144/pg1

Liberals telling me I don't know what I'm talking about, but they cannot explain how I'm wrong. Typical.

---

christopera said:

Technically speaking that poster is incorrect.

---

JHOVA said:

whats "git er done" in muslim?

---

christopera said:

I can tell. He's got at least three keys on his bomb strings and is running in a field during a lightning storm hoping to join the gods above.

---

JHOVA said:

whats "git er done" in muslim?

---

Necropolis said:

VroomerMcZoomers said:

What with the insane rantings that pass for public discourse in America, it's no wonder some less intelligent people would be driven to do something like that.

---

The Unabomber's IQ was over 160 and his IEDs were also quite crude. He was anti-democrat/communist according to his manifesto. The average IQ of serial bombers is quite a bit higher than that of most other types of serial killers. Not saying this person killed anyone though. I actually think this is an elaborate hoax of sorts for political reasons.

---

It was very clear from his bombs that he was anti technology. I read an FBI analysis of his devices and really dude, laying terror to a nation with a mixture of gunpowder and matchhead shavings in metal tubing? Watch a TED Talk Literally one step up from cratermakers kids make from spent air rifle cartridges. (and gore themselves with the shrapnel with, don't!)

An IQ of 160? He mustve been REALLY averse to chemistry.

Asante said:

Necropolis said:

VroomerMcZoomers said:

What with the insane rantings that pass for public discourse in America, it's no wonder some less intelligent people would be driven to do something like that.

---

The Unabomber's IQ was over 160 and his IEDs were also quite crude. He was anti-democrat/communist according to his manifesto. The average IQ of serial bombers is quite a bit higher than that of most other types of serial killers. Not saying this person killed anyone though. I actually think this is an elaborate hoax of sorts for political reasons.

---

It was very clear from his bombs that he was anti technology. I read an FBI analysis of his devices and really dude, laying terror to a nation with a mixture of gunpowder and matchhead shavings in metal tubing? Watch a TED Talk Literally one step up from cratermakers kids make from spent air rifle cartridges. (and gore themselves with the shrapnel with, don't!)

An IQ of 160? He mustve been REALLY averse to chemistry.

---