LogicaL Chaos said:

Does he sound "Crazy"? Or does the science he speak of sound logical and rational?

---

LogicaL Chaos said:

Thats part of the cover up.

If u look into Bob Lazars current life, he owns a company called United Nuclear: https://unitednuclear.com/index.php?main_page=page&id=25&zenid=1djma4b0iu31kcp97qkl65l4o6

Go ahead, order some supplies, its a real site. I cannot, im broke.

Anyway, Bob Lazars business deals with nuclear testing supplies and equipment. Guess what Los Alamos deals with, nuclear testing equipment.

Coincidence? I think not.

---

Near Dylan said:

Do you believe that an extra-terrestial species has ever observed, visited, landed on, or  made contact with earth?

Spoiler alert: They haven't

Post your theory, and give some evidence if you can. Try not to make it an hour long documentary. If you have to do that, put timestamps for important information.

---

Enlil said:

LogicaL Chaos said:

Does he sound "Crazy"? Or does the science he speak of sound logical and rational?

---

Actual particle physicists will tell you the dude is crazy.

---

Enlil said:

LogicaL Chaos said:

Does he sound "Crazy"? Or does the science he speak of sound logical and rational?

---

Actual particle physicists will tell you the dude is crazy.

---

LogicaL Chaos said:

What if our understanding of gravity is wrong? What if there is a new type of gravity that only exists at the atomic level?

---

Quote:

I want to take some time here to talk about scientific progress, because there is one common objection to my critique of Lazar’s scenario. People will often say “Modern science could be wrong. Newton was wrong! Lazar could be right!” Yes. That is correct. In fact, modern science almost certainly IS “wrong.” But the only real test of a theory in science is that it works. Newton’s Laws worked. They still do in most situations. Einstein’s theories are better – they are more accurate and they work in more situations. New theories will continue to come along that are more precise and more generally applicable than the older theories, and these new theories will be tested by experiments until they supplant the old ones. That is how science has progressed for the past 400 years.



So it is not enough to SAY  that modern science is wrong. You have to demonstrate that you have something that is better. And that “better” theory needs to do everything that the old theory does, and then do more. And chances are that it won’t completely turn the old theory on it’s head – because we already know that the old theories work too well. It is not possible to create a new theory until you understand the old one well enough to present a coherent alternative. Calling current science “total nonsense” is nice rhetoric, and no doubt convincing to many non-scientists who feel alienated from science and look on scientists as a kind of modern priesthood of arcane knowledge. But science is a process – not a body of knowledge.


I can't possibly demonstrate conclusively that Lazar's mechanism is impossible. All that I can hope to demonstrate here is that his scenario would require a COMPLETE overhaul of our theories of gravity and particle physics in order to work. Not just some minor changes...I'm talking from the ground up. Mr. Lazar makes no mention of this fact, and he proposes no alternative theories. But, if Lazar's scenario is true, then we will NEED some new theories, because we are wrong about a great many things. We don't understand gravity. We don't understand nuclear interactions. We don't understand spacetime. We don't understand stellar evolution. However, considering Mr. Lazar's careless use of language, his casual redefinition of scientific terms, and the complete lack of details in his presentation, I'm willing to bet the farm that it is actually Lazar who doesn't understand any of these things.

---

Quote:

The best evidence of UFOs is to see one in action, so get outside and travel to S4 or Dugway or Dulce, camp out a couple nights and tell me u dont see anything strange.

---

LogicaL Chaos said:

So what do u guys think of the ID card of Bob Lazar?

www.boblazar.com

It says "Department of Naval Intelligence" on his W2 and his ID badge.

If he was lying, wouldnt it make more sense to put "Department of the Air Force" as Nellis Air Force Base (Area 51) is right next to S4?

---

LogicaL Chaos said:

Also check out this news clip: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp11m01338r000400480018-9

Also, why is page two "denied"?

---