Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Re: MMGG-Tek or PF-Tek ?
    #24539 -

it should be dark during the incubation period, because you don't want the mycelium to start making pins before the cake is covered AND if you have your jars right-side-up then the mushrooms will grow the wrong way. That is, if they are a phototropic variety.

Basically, it doesn't need light and light will just confuse the fungus more than it needs to be, leaving more chance for failure.

------------------
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
-Dr. Johnson
"I should play God and just shoot you myself."
-Tool
happy shrooming!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: MMGG-Tek or PF-Tek ?
    #24541 -

pf cakes usally dont want to pin untill there fully coloniozed unless they have staleld for a reason. I wouldnt worry about the light yet.

------------------
Pics of a 15 cup casing comming soon



--------------------
Mad skills, you know this!!!

I am here to Myth Bust

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: MMGG-Tek or PF-Tek ?
    #24542 -

i like to put my jars into light when they are about 2/3 colonized...this way they either pin just before birthed..or right after. It cuts the wait for pins down alot.

-Primate

------------------
~~"Everybody seems to think I'm lazy, I don't mind, I think they're Crazy"~~
-John Lennon



--------------------
"Power to the peaceful"

-Micheal Franti and Spearhead

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: MMGG-Tek or PF-Tek ?
    #24543 -

I exposed my 12 jars to plenty of light during incubation. They did not pin until after full colonization.I used PF spore race.No problem!


--------------------
"ROADS?? Where we're going we don't need..roads."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: MMGG-Tek or PF-Tek ?
    #24544 -

You might read this thread at Drooldonkey.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* MMGG or PF tek? shroominbloom 1,986 5 11/19/02 11:32 AM
by shroominbloom
* stupid question about PF/MMGG TEK mrhappy 1,609 8 03/04/02 04:55 PM
by cookiewhore
* PF tek or MMGG? shroomizzy 4,407 8 11/03/02 05:37 PM
by telefunkenU47
* New Tek is complete, What do you think?
( 1 2 3 all )
NewbieShroomer 26,109 47 05/15/23 09:15 PM
by johnukguy
* Re: Any recommended changes to the MMGG? JeeLiX 1,276 9 03/30/01 09:04 PM
by Taz
* Anything better than BRF for PF Tek? (alkaloids) Viking 3,663 3 12/03/02 03:30 PM
by Anno
* best pf-tek without pressure cooker Told 29,641 8 05/13/03 11:09 PM
by LiL_KuSsH
* Re: PF tek or MMGG crispy 3,140 6 06/23/00 02:22 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: DERRAYLD, Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, the_chosen_one, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, hamloaf, cronicr, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
2,680 topic views. 9 members, 270 guests and 168 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 13 queries.