Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Cultivation
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Re: PF tek or MMGG
    #21619 -

Welcome to The Shroomery :smile:. Read as much as you can. This sight has everything you need to learn about growing mushrooms. Both techs that you mention are valid. See you around :wink:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PF tek or MMGG [Re: crispy]
    #21621 -

well there pretty mucht he same. The mmgg is just easier to understand.


--------------------
Mad skills, you know this!!!

I am here to Myth Bust

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PF tek or MMGG [Re: crispy]
    #21622 -

I just printed out the Pf info thats on their page as well as the MMGG. Then i just bassically used them both as guides. I came up with excellent results.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PF tek or MMGG [Re: crispy]
    #21623 -

Printing out a hard copy of either the PF Tek or the MMGG (or both) is a very good idea. It allows you to flip through and get a very thorough understanding of the tek. I had to read the PF Tek at least ten times through before I even began to understand it. Just make sure you keep the guide in a safe place away from unwanted eyes.

------------------
Baldy


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PF tek or MMGG [Re: crispy]
    #21624 -

Baldy is right.
My buddy has about 14-16 differant teks that he keeps in an unmarked binder with his old collage books. It is very interesting to look through, even if you don't grow. It just has a shitload of info that you can read when you want. He also always has it by his side when trying new teks and follows it step by step.
I think he first started with the MMGG.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PF tek or MMGG [Re: crispy]
    #21625 -

A friend of mine who is growing used both teks the same week off same spores and found that the MMGG tek seems to colonize quiker. I think its because it asks for more vermiculite which gives the substrate more air. He could be wrong but this is what my friend believes.

------------------
I'm against mushroom abortions.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PF tek or MMGG [Re: crispy]
    #21626 -

This is just random spouting off from a relatively inexperienced cultivator, but I got good results on my first try so I'll throw in my two cents. I don't know that you should even follow either the pftek or the mmgg exactly. Afterall, I'm sure they were created after lots and lots of experimentation. Instead of following word for word, take in each section of the documents as a set of ideas and kinda improvise as you see fit. When you see a description of how to keep a certain thing sterile for instance, if instead of blindly following some instructions you understand what is trying to be accomplished and do it your own modified or innovated way you will gain experience much more quickly and have a better understanding of how the stuff works. I don't even see how the mmgg and pftek are dissimilar enough to really even distinguish between using one method or the other. I read both documents extensively then used sort of a mix of them, improvising both where I thought I could do something better or just had no choice for lack of materials and/or money.

So I guess my suggestion would be to read EVERYTHING available so that you know what everybody's ideas are on the topic, then make your own interpretation.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Cultivation
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Do You Think This idea from Pf Tek will work?
( 1 2 all )		 PooGrower 5,196 25 11/29/02 04:00 PM
by Skikid16
* PF tek or MMGG? shroomizzy 4,360 8 11/03/02 03:37 PM
by telefunkenU47
* *deleted* a3d0a3m 1,785 3 10/12/01 11:14 AM
by BeppoMarx
* MMGG or PF tek? shroominbloom 1,974 5 11/19/02 09:32 AM
by shroominbloom
* PF Tek - Tape On Holes Question fireworks_godS 11,067 5 04/20/02 09:59 AM
by fireworks_god
* what's the PF tek? happycamper 1,101 4 05/16/02 11:35 PM
by WakingUpLate
* Anything better than BRF for PF Tek? (alkaloids) Viking 3,649 3 12/03/02 01:30 PM
by Anno
* Re: Anybody have experience with PF tek? Anonymous 5,915 6 12/19/99 01:25 AM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, the_chosen_one, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, hamloaf, cronicr, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
3,113 topic views. 9 members, 1,539 guests and 83 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.012 seconds on 16 queries.