Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Feminized Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2  [ show all ]
The Gospel of Mary Magdalene
    #2008720 -

[Page 10. Pages 1-6 are missing]

1 Peter said to Mary:
2 "Sister, we know that the Teacher loved you
3 differently from other women.
4 Tell us whatever you remember
5 of any words he told you
6 which we have not yet heard."
7 Mary said to them:
8 "I will now speak to you
9 of that which has not been given to you to hear.
10 I had a vision of the Teacher,
11 and I said to him:
12 'Lord I see you now
13 in this vision.'
14 And he answered:
15 'You are blessed, for the sight of me does not disturb you.
16 There where is the nous, lies the treasure.'
17 Then I said to him:
18 'Lord, when someone meets you
19 in a Moment of vision,
20 is it through the soul [psyche] that they see,
21 or is it through the Spirit [Pneuma]?'
22 The Teacher answered:
23 'It is neither through the soul nor the spirit,
24 but the nous between the two
25 which sees the vision...'"

From: 'The Gospel of Mary Magdalene' translated by Jean-Yves Leloup.
The Gospel was discovered in 1896, as a 5th century copy. Fragments from much earlier documents place its original writng at about 150 A.D. which means that it was contemporaneous with the Gospels that entered into the canonical Bible.




--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #2008882 -

i just read that 2 days ago...funny coincedence. i really enjoyed the gospel of thomas, so ive been reading much at a gnostic website lately...i just started to really look into gnosticism, it really resonates with me, it seems very deep, almost mystical.

---------------->heres some of this web web page sites translation....------------------

9) Blessed are you that you did not waver at the sight of Me. For where the mind is there is the treasure.
10) I said to Him, Lord, how does he who sees the vision see it, through the soul or through the spirit?
11) The Savior answered and said, He does not see through the soul nor through the spirit, but the mind that is between the two that is what sees the vision and it is


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: MarkostheGnostic] * 1
    #2009137 -

I think she had an intimate relationship with Him.

:kiss:  :loveeyes:


:thumbup:






 


--------------------


Dei Gratia de integro,

Veni Vidi Vici:

In Nomine Domini..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Deiymiyan]
    #2009584 -

wow great thread. I find this very intresting, maybe you can answer my questions

"'It is neither through the soul nor the spirit,
24 but the nous between the two
25 which sees the vision...'"

what does jesus mean when he says but "the nous between the two" does he mean like the thing inbetween soul and spirit? and what is that? the mind?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: 2Experimental]
    #2009655 -

In this formulation, the 'nous' is the aspect of our being (usually broken down into body [soma], soul [psyche], spirit [pneuma]) that 'interfaces with the Holy Spirit [Pneuma] which, in Orthodox theology proceeds from the Second Hypostasis or Logos, or 'Son' (anthropomorphically taken) of God. The nous is the 'intermediary' between human beinghood and Absolute Being (God). Nous is often translated 'mind,' but it is a transcendental aspect of mind, not our mundane thinking apparatus.


--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Deiymiyan]
    #2009676 -

The book suggests that only married men - that is whole men - men who have integrated their sexual function into their personality - were allowed to speak in the synagogue. Jesus often spoke in the synagogue. The sexual function was always important in Judaism. The Shekinah or 'Divine Indwelling' hovers over the marriage bed. The only noted cause for transmigration of the soul in later Kabbalah, was for one's failure to follow the commandment to 'be fruitful and multiply.' It was a gross distortion of Catholicism to push for celibacy which has no part in Jewish spirituality or holiness. I agree that Jesus may have had an intimate relationship with Mary (the text sys that He often kissed her on the mouth). This does not necessarily mean that He had physical relations with her.


--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #2009716 -

Not sure where to get info on this but i saw a show on TLC sometime ago that was really intresting. It explained how Jesus could have not died on the cross, and that many believe that he was crucified but didnt die there. And that he actually moved out of that land and married Mary Magdalene and had children. They sayed that at one point the Catholic church became aware of this through new found scriptures and that the Blood-line of Jesus was still amongs us know as the Holy Graal or SangGraal some shit like that. Anyway the Catholic priests kept this hidden and took the secret to the graves and one of them went crazy and was never heard of again. Weird shit but this post makes me wanna look into this TLC program again, maybe i can get it on video or something. Cool.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Spokesman]
    #2009882 -

Yes...and the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ by Levi (20th century) fantasized that Jesus traveled to India, Tibet, Persia and acquired all kinds of esoteric knowledge before returning to Jerusalem. There are all kinds of strange tales about Jesus, but there are extra-Biblical sources, like the historian Josephus who recounted the crucifixion of 'a certain Chrestus [sic]' (chrestus means 'kind'). The man was probably executed like the Good Book says. Romans crucified as many as 6000 individuals in one day, following an insurrection, and executed for practically nothing at all. The Qu'ran denies that Jesus (a prophet) died on the cross, because it was a shameful death, and a prophet of God wouldn't die a shameful death (of course, Muslims miss the whole point of an Incarnation which partakes of the very breadth and depth of human existence - including humiliation). Certain Gnostics shared the heresy of Docetism which maintained that Jesus had an 'astral' body for lack of a better word, not a fleshy body. The 'insertion' about [Doubting] Thomas putting his finger into the wounds of Jesus was a polemical attack on those who denied the physical body of Jesus. This also denies the Incarnational theology of Christianity. This Sacred Bloodline idea is a kind of weird 'spiritual supremacy' trip which would not be permitted by God's plan since it is an obvious contradiction to the colorless, raceless, universality that Christ represents ('In Christ there is no male or female, freeman or slave...').


--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #2009953 -

markos, could you tell us some basics on aeons? and, how far did christ travel in his lifetime?


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: CleverName]
    #2010576 -

It would've been very weird if jesus was an adult jew and he wasn't married.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2010792 -

Cervantes said:
It would've been very weird if jesus was an adult jew and he wasn't married.


Especially considering how hot I was back in that day... and Mary is quite exisquite in the tent, I might add.
Peace.


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you
:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: CleverName]
    #2010849 -

It is unlikely that Jesus traveled more than 200 miles from his home, according to Biblical scholars. But of course, it is uncertain as to whether He was born in Nazareth, or in Bethlehem. The latter is supported by the Isaiah text as a prophesy (which gets into that whole 'born of a virgin' mistranslation of the Hebrew word 'almah' [young woman], not 'bertollah' [virgin] into the Greek Septuigint that Matthew apparently mistranslated by the single Greek word for both - 'parthenos' or virgin. But I digress).

The aeons in many Gnostic systems are personifications of 'eternal qualities or principles' that belong to the Pleroma [Fullness]. Pleroma is also used Biblically with regard to Christ as having 'the fullness of the Godhead. Jung looked at the complex cosmologies of the Gnostics and found them to be projections of the various components of the human psyche which he then renamed: e.g., demiurge (shadow), Pleroma (Self), Wisdom (anima), aeons (archetypes), etc.


--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #2010936 -

One thing I know is poor Mary is thought of quite negatively by hispanic catholics.Putamary is a common curse and it means mary the whore.My own belief is Mary was Yeshuas first and most loved disciple and that The Christ would hold a mere woman in such regard was not in the mores of the time so she was gradually edited out of significance,and possibly was some of the "problem" Yeshua presented to the jewish hierarchy.
WR:rasta:


--------------------
To old for this place

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #2011332 -

"(which gets into that whole 'born of a virgin' mistranslation of the Hebrew word 'almah' [young woman], not 'bertollah' [virgin] into the Greek Septuigint that Matthew apparently mistranslated by the single Greek word for both - 'parthenos' or virgin. But I digress)"
----------------------


DING DING DING !!!!!

You are correct on that point.

That word used for virgin was meant as 'a very young woman'..

When looking upon that word, you have to consider it's meaning as it was used during the times...  and not as it's meaning is today.



===============

"I agree that Jesus may have had an intimate relationship with Mary (the text sys that He often kissed her on the mouth). This does not necessarily mean that He had physical relations with her. "
----------------------

Kissing alone, is physical. 

Regardless..  I see no reason as to why He would not have had 'real' physical relations..  Portraying sexual encounters of any kind, as ugly or unholy is ... tsk tsk tsk..  :nonono:

He had a physical body; surely since He could feel pain, then He'd be interested in pleasure as well.  It would be His right to have a good time if He wanted to.



 


--------------------


Dei Gratia de integro,

Veni Vidi Vici:

In Nomine Domini..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Deiymiyan]
    #2011385 -

"I agree that Jesus may have had an intimate relationship with Mary (the text sys that He often kissed her on the mouth). This does not necessarily mean that He had physical relations with her. "

Most Educated clergy learn in school how Mary Magdalene's story was changed to meet the needs of the early Christian church.

Chances are, she and Jesus were married. Perhaps they had children.

If Jesus wasn't married, his apostles would have cretainly written about it. If I understand correctly, he wouldn't even be considered Jewish if he wasnt hitched.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2011411 -

"..You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.."
-----------------------------

That word is 'inconceivable' ... Isn't that right Cervantes?



===================
"If I understand correctly, he wouldn't even be considered Jewish if he wasnt hitched."
----------------------------

Hey... now that's interesting. If we could back that up with a source.. Then we might just have the begining of something there.




--------------------


Dei Gratia de integro,

Veni Vidi Vici:

In Nomine Domini..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Deiymiyan]
    #2011494 -

The Bible speaks of Jesus losing his temper and getting violent in several occasions, We all know he liked to get drunk too so why would it be so out of this world for him to look at Mary and be like "Damn she fine!" How do you think the Nephlim (sp?) were created back in Genesis? We humans got some fine looking females, ooh yeeah!


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Spokesman]
    #2011514 -

Deiymiyan,

My only source is a piece of fiction. "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown. Very good book. Part thriller, part history lesson. I highly recomend it but I know it isn't the best source to quote.

In his foreward, Dan Brown was emphatic that all his historical statements made in his book were accurate but I'm hoping Markos or someone can back this statement up with a factual source.

His book, also, ties Mary with the Holy Grail.

Indeed, inconceivable is the word you keep using.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Spokesman]
    #2011715 -

"The Bible speaks of Jesus losing his temper and getting violent in several occasions, We all know he liked to get drunk too so why would it be so out of this world for him to look at Mary and be like "Damn she fine!"  "
-----------------------

Yup.  He sure did lose His temper.  And you are right, He wasn't very nice about it either.  He was most likely quite a physically strong individual.

And I do agree that He most likely enjoyed the many wonderous fruits of creation such as wine and beauty.
===============


"How do you think the Nephlim (sp?) were created back in Genesis?"
----------------------

I think that this issue would go to pre-Genesis.  Witnessing the fall of one of their kind into "The Nothing" [I'm saying nothing because there is no name for it], many of the others might have followed as a rescue attempt.  Upon Genesis, thereafter, they'd become more physical by entering physical bodies in a rather physical plane.

There, they patiently wait.
===============


"We humans got some fine looking females, ooh yeeah!"
----------------------

Agreed.  :nut:


 


--------------------


Dei Gratia de integro,

Veni Vidi Vici:

In Nomine Domini..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2011723 -

"His book, also, ties Mary with the Holy Grail."
---------------------


How?




--------------------


Dei Gratia de integro,

Veni Vidi Vici:

In Nomine Domini..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Deiymiyan]
    #2011818 -

Another term for grail is chalice, the holiest chalice was between Mary's legs... especially if she did the old bump and grind with Jesus.

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/L/leonardo/lastsupp.jpg.html

Look at Da Vinci's last Supper. Who sits on the right side of Christ? Not Peter, Peter's on the left... making a threatening gesture towards... a woman?

Look closely.

Da Vinci knew how to draw men and women.

Who would sit on Christ's right side if it wasn't Peter? Mary of Magdaline would.

Most important, If this is the Last Supper, where is the Holy Grail? It isn't in the picture. He added the bread but there are no cups at all. Surely, Da Vinci would have included the most infamous part of the last supper in his portrait. Or is the grail in the picture after all?

The shape of Jesus and Mary's bodys make a "V" or a "Y" The shape of a chalice.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2013163 -

Look closely.

Da Vinci knew how to draw men and women.

Who would sit on Christ's right side if it wasn't Peter? Mary of Magdaline would.

Most important, If this is the Last Supper, where is the Holy Grail? It isn't in the picture. He added the bread but there are no cups at all. Surely, Da Vinci would have included the most infamous part of the last supper in his portrait. Or is the grail in the picture after all.

The shape of Jesus and Mary's bodys make a "V" or a "Y" The shape of a chalice.


wow great info and observations. i wonder if the dude giving the bird really is peter, and I wonder who he is GLARING at... I cant tell.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: 2Experimental]
    #2013182 -

*i wonder if the dude giving the bird really is peter, and I wonder who he is GLARING at... I cant tell.

Yeah, that is a little subjective but it is what I heard.

It does look like he's pointing at the woman but it is a little unclear.

Peter is definately not sitting at Jesus' right hand.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: 2Experimental]
    #2013234 -



Thumbnail. Woohoo!


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2013353 -

Thanks for the thumbnail. :smile:

Yeah that is a woman next to Jesus and shes the only woman. And sitting on the right side of Jesus i assume would make you quite important.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Spokesman]
    #2013375 -

It would in the day Da Vinci painted the picture. The Grail was also very famous at that time.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2013388 -

Supposedly, the colors on Jesus and Mary's sash are telling. Sort of a yin yang idea. They compliment each other. Jesus wears blue and red/orange, Mary wears baby blue and pink/peach the feminine equivilent of Jesus' garb.

They're certainly wearing similar outfits... perhaps to imply a relationship. Their outfits mirror each other's.

Look at what the other apostles are wearing. Nothing like Jesus or Mary. I'm callin her Mary!

Mary and Jesus' clothes further paint the Grail.

They are holding hands. This completes the image.

A very feminine looking Grail if you ask me.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2014869 -

is it just me or r the disiples painted fat as shit?


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: CleverName]
    #2014909 -

especially the guy on the right of jesus....they look like slobs...no?


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2014993 -

Cervantes said:
Da Vinci knew how to draw men and women.



He just didn't know anything about having sex with one.... ahem! gay! cough cough..
:grin:
Peace.


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you
:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: fireworks_god]
    #2015086 -

His homosexuality is important to his views towards Christianity, fireworks_god. I'm glad you brought it up.

As a homosexual, Leo embraced femininity in a different way than his contemporary, (ahem,) heterosexual (cough...) Christian counterparts.

He was upset at the Catholic Church for editing the New Testiment (around 200 AD) this is when books like the Gospel of Mary disapeared.

Mary was re-cast as a whore. And Jesus was painted as single.

This was a simple way of getting the Earth and Godess loving Pagans to agree with the Christian way.

In order to convince Pagans to believe in Christianity, they had to take power away from pagan females. This is when witch hunting began. This is why Paganism and women, to this day, are connected with witchcraft.

The Christian Church decided, at the same time, to connect Christianity's big holidays with the Pagan Solstice holidays. This was a way to draw even more Pagans into the Church.

Leonardo Da Vinci knew all this and he knew how Clergy are taught their Church history in Davinity School. Compounded by the Church's views towards homosexuality, Leonardo Da Vinci loved sticking it to the Church. Especially when they comissioned him to work for them.

Leonardo was a great and famous artist... he put his views of the church in plain sight.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2015140 -

Too bad he couldn't draw a vagina, though, eh? :grin: (anyone else ever seen that sketch?)

Just kidding, of course, it doesn't matter. :grin:

I have always hated how people could take the Bible and change it to make it more acceptible to others.. It wasn't like Jesus changed his message when he was preaching it to appease the people that disagreed with him... of course, what sucks is that all our knowledge of his ideas come from the same book that others changed to fit their own needs, so fuck my ole' boots...
Peace.



--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you
:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2020314 -

Awesome search and posting Cervantes !!!!  :thumbup:


I have a question though, concerning the Last Supper illustration you supplied..

If that is The Last Supper,  then who wasn't invited?????


There are 13 individuals at that table..  12+ Jesus.

There were 12 known close friends of Jesus..  +Mary ..  That should make 13.


So, if that is Mary,  who was not allowed to join the party?  :oogle:




 


--------------------


Dei Gratia de integro,

Veni Vidi Vici:

In Nomine Domini..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Deiymiyan]
    #2020468 -

Well, the answer I found doesn't call her Mary. You'll get a kick out of this.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2020478 -



It suggests Peter is to the right of Mary and it calls Mary... wait for it... John.

I don't know who decided which apostle is which.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Rose]
    #2020574 -

Judas left before the painting was done.............


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Spokesman]
    #2020992 -

hehehe


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Gospel of Mary Magdalene [Re: Spokesman]
    #2022334 -

Spokesman said:
Judas left before the painting was done............. 


Judas Priest, maybe. :grin:
Peace.


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you
:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Feminized Cannabis Seeds

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* July 22 - Feast Day of Mary Magdalene - Divine Wisdom
( 1 2 all )		 MarkostheGnostic 3,482 26 07/27/04 02:40 PM
by MarkostheGnostic
* The Gospel of Mary Magdalene
( 1 2 all )		 MarkostheGnostic 6,377 35 04/27/08 09:01 PM
by MarkostheGnostic
* Were Jesus and Mary Magdalene lovers?
( 1 2 all )		 DuggstarMDiscord 3,276 32 04/26/09 05:06 AM
by OrgoneConclusion
* .
( 1 2 all )		 z_x_x_z 1,965 30 10/15/07 05:17 PM
by onlynow
* Gospel of Thomas Atomisk 1,088 10 03/09/04 07:11 PM
by Divided_Sky
* Da Vinci Code DNKYD 906 13 03/17/05 02:03 PM
by Huehuecoyotl
* The Gospel of Judas
( 1 2 all )		 Basilides 2,032 32 04/09/06 03:38 PM
by Silversoul
* How many of the 4 major Gospels were eye witness accounts? FreakQlibrium 952 12 06/22/05 07:37 AM
by gnrm23

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
3,024 topic views. 0 members, 331 guests and 30 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.051 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 14 queries.