Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Different wavelengths
    #18169953 -

Do you ever find yourself reading someone's post or talking to someone in life, maybe in an unlikely situation, to find you are interpreting only what you think and they are interpreting only what they think such that you're basically not even talking to one another?

Like I read posts on here and go, oh, wait a second, they are in a totally different universe or something, because that's not at all what I'm talking about, but I can see how I might have once seen it that way, if I was being particularly linear etc.?

Perceptually it's a different wavelength, they are seemingly caught in something that is not the case for me. All I have really done is apprehended the present. Here, what I am thinking doesn't seem to be shared by others I meet/talk to.

Insanity, wavelengths, higher consciousness?


--------------------
My solitude...
My shield...
My armour...

TESTED
WITH
FULL
FORCE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: circastes]
    #18169965 -

Most interactions are only interpreted from the frame of reference the people are in. Different frame of reference (determined by past experience) means different interpretation. No way around it except to be as clear and concise as possible.


--------------------
Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth, and taste...

:haha:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: circastes]
    #18170315 -

circastes said:
Do you ever find yourself reading someone's post or talking to someone in life, maybe in an unlikely situation, to find you are interpreting only what you think and they are interpreting only what they think such that you're basically not even talking to one another?

Like I read posts on here and go, oh, wait a second, they are in a totally different universe or something, because that's not at all what I'm talking about, but I can see how I might have once seen it that way, if I was being particularly linear etc.?

Perceptually it's a different wavelength, they are seemingly caught in something that is not the case for me. All I have really done is apprehended the present. Here, what I am thinking doesn't seem to be shared by others I meet/talk to.

Insanity, wavelengths, higher consciousness?


I have great pity for all the others here. I'm up in the rarified air looking down on them. It's sooooo lonely up here. :sad:






:haha:


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: circastes] * 1
    #18170435 -

we are just reacting to the last break
we are like billiards balls colliding
anything falls in the pocket - that's bonus, you get another turn.


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: circastes]
    #18170439 -

circastes said:
Do you ever find yourself reading someone's post or talking to someone in life, maybe in an unlikely situation, to find you are interpreting only what you think and they are interpreting only what they think such that you're basically not even talking to one another?

Like I read posts on here and go, oh, wait a second, they are in a totally different universe or something, because that's not at all what I'm talking about, but I can see how I might have once seen it that way, if I was being particularly linear etc.?

Perceptually it's a different wavelength, they are seemingly caught in something that is not the case for me. All I have really done is apprehended the present. Here, what I am thinking doesn't seem to be shared by others I meet/talk to.

Insanity, wavelengths, higher consciousness?


I think that if what you thought was completely logical and objective, or rational then one might predict what you think. It is that the purely rational leads to predetermination, but within the chaos of randomness, reality appears to be up for grabs.

How much do we depend on thoughts and logic to determine reality?

Do thoughts play a part in reality, or the perception of?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: redgreenvines]
    #18171855 -

redgreenvines said:
we are like billiards balls colliding



That's a simile, using like or as.

A metaphor wouldn't have like or as.

I learned it again in Composition II.

What do I win?


--------------------
Evolution of Time.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: Droz]
    #18172375 -

well got the question right if the question was "is this a metaphor?".
and that's something you could take home to momma.


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: circastes]
    #18172778 -

Yeah kind of like you and me.  I speak my mind rant and all, you talk in largely psychobabble and a dreamlike state to my ears.  Yet, I seek out your posts for creative dissonance and like them all the same.  Opposites attract, or we both spend time in our backyards on different sides of the world.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Different wavelengths [Re: lolwut]
    #18172780 -

lolwut said:
Most interactions are only interpreted from the frame of reference the people are in. Different frame of reference (determined by past experience) means different interpretation. No way around it except to be as clear and concise as possible.


and to actually try to listen to what the other person is saying.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* wavelengths.. hypothetical Cracka_X 1,121 10 06/04/08 04:11 PM
by Cracka_X
* abandonment of interpretations
( 1 2 all )		 MokshaIs 3,109 38 04/16/08 06:02 PM
by redgreenvines
* Is there a coherent interpretation of the Bible- even through 'non-litteral interpretations'?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )		 johnm214 6,382 113 10/28/12 05:54 PM
by johnm214
* Interpretations of enlightenment TheGus 1,013 8 10/02/05 10:36 AM
by redgreenvines
* Experience vs. Interpretation OrgoneConclusion 882 8 10/06/07 03:33 PM
by Icelander
* Interpreting the Bible.
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )		 Newbie 4,474 105 03/20/13 04:26 PM
by Cactilove
* An exercise in interpretation or intention.
( 1 2 3 all )		 Anonymous 3,453 42 02/11/04 04:06 PM
by trendal
* Quantum State of Interpretation hTx 350 3 12/09/14 04:46 PM
by DividedQuantum

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
368 topic views. 3 members, 805 guests and 58 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.