Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
the official constructive criticism thread
    #16770536 -

Well, my opt-out thread and penguins thread got me thinking. I wonder what we all do that irritates each other. Personal character flaws and such and I think of us as a community of friends, almost an internet family based on how obscure and relatively small this is compared to other online forums. So, lets help each other examine and discover things we do that has the potential to damage relationships or hinder opportunities we may have in life. Try to do it in a diplomatic and tactful manner though, so we can avoid the flaming and trolling that accompanies being offensive/offended.

Reply to the poster above you.

Go!


:awesomenod::hug::hippie::awecid:


--------------------

Edited by DivineIntensity (09/01/12 10:46 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: DivineIntensity] * 1
    #16770563 -

I think the reason why nobody replied to this post yet is because you give us nothing to work with. If I'm supposed to reply to the poster above that means I'm replying to you, but I don't have anything constructive to say.


--------------------
Madly I Do.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: chiefin123]
    #16770586 -

chiefin123 said:
I think the reason why nobody replied to this post yet is because you give us nothing to work with. If I'm supposed to reply to the poster above that means I'm replying to you, but I don't have anything constructive to say.



You nailed constructive on the head. All I can say is that I would have liked a few more smiley faces and emote images to visually communicate your message. :gooby:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: mrckb]
    #16770591 -

mrckb said:
chiefin123 said:
I think the reason why nobody replied to this post yet is because you give us nothing to work with. If I'm supposed to reply to the poster above that means I'm replying to you, but I don't have anything constructive to say.



You nailed constructive on the head. All I can say is that I would have liked a few more smiley faces and emote images to visually communicate your message. :gooby:



Good call!  Graemlins generally make a post that much more awesome :awesome:


--------------------
So I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. - Galatians 5:16

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: chiefin123]
    #16770594 -

What I mean is, well, if you've seen me post and such everything you know about me is based off that and most people are the same on the internet as in life. Maybe a bit more rude because of the anonymity, but nothing major. From what you can observe from what I've.posted give me your view. What about me, do you think I should improve on, do you have any tips on how I could. And for the things you think are positive, reinforce them.

My bad for not making it clear.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: DivineIntensity]
    #16770606 -

I can't think of anything that I would recommend to you to improve on ... I already like you and your posts the way that you/they are.  So I guess I don't have any constructive criticism for you.

Do you have any constructive criticism for me?


--------------------
So I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. - Galatians 5:16

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: HB]
    #16770620 -

Although I enjoy reading your posts, you guys arent playing by the rules. Maybe try giving feedback on other peoples posts so that the thread doesnt de-rail?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: chiefin123]
    #16770632 -

IMO I kickstarted the thread and it would've been a thread unreplied if it wasn't for me. On the positive side, I like your deep insights and careful explanations.:bigjoint:


--------------------
Madly I Do.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: the official constructive criticism thread [Re: chiefin123]
    #16770696 -

From what I can tell, this is the first posts I've ever seen from you. But basically, you're fine with pointing out flaws and you do it in a way to avoid inciting negativity. I can't pin, anything negative yet since I don't know you well enough.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Official Search Assistance Thread!
( 1 2 3 all )
PapaverS 9,384 54 12/06/02 12:29 AM
by Papaver
* *Official Amanda photo thread* NO FLAMES
( 1 2 all )
LearyfanS 12,525 31 12/11/02 03:13 PM
by Papaver
* RAAAAAAAWH (Official Punk Song Thread)
( 1 2 all )
Cracka_X 6,787 39 10/24/24 06:17 PM
by 073202
* Mexicali Blues (official cowboy song thread)
( 1 2 3 all )
Ripple 10,993 52 07/09/11 01:17 AM
by ModularMind
* *Official*...what r u going to be for holloween?
( 1 2 3 all )
40oz 6,193 56 10/29/02 11:04 PM
by Baby_Hitler
* Official Dead tour post
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Ripple 10,931 60 07/02/03 12:31 PM
by Ripple
* Official Shroomery Shape-Up Program!
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Delyrium 9,689 70 05/04/04 10:36 PM
by utopianglory
* Construction construction construction MOTH 710 4 04/14/04 02:28 PM
by MOTH

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
452 topic views. 7 members, 164 guests and 155 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.