Lakefingers said:

RationalEgo said:

I have read much f [SIC] his supposed 'Critique of Pure Reason", which was total nonsense and drivel of the pseudo-intellectual variety.

---

RationalEgo said:

It [referring to a quote found here] does not lend any credence to the rest of his disgusting philosophy.

---

What I would like to hear is why Kant's philosophy is pseudo-intellectual drivel. I would like to hear this especially from someone, anyone who's even made an honest attempt at trying understand Kant, rather than being colored by prejudice and second-hand sources.

---

You either find Kant's philosophy valid or not. Where does the "pseudo" part come in?

I suspect the term "pseudo intellectual" was coined as counter intellectual elitist elitism.