Home | Community | Message Board

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Myyco.com Shop: Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  [ show all ]
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11277708 -

koraks said:
DragonChaser said:
The DIFFERENCE between .99 repeating and 1 DOES NOT EXIST.




I disagree; think of a limit. A function may have a valid value for x=0.99 recurring, but not for x=1. Hence, they are not the same.



It doesn't matter if you disagree.  This has been proven countless times by countless mathematicians.

You don't need to give me a link on what a limit is; I'm a math major, I've taken more than one proofs class.

Sorry, but, you're wrong.  And your comparison to a limit has nothing to do with the answer here.  With a limit, you're taking values and seeing what they approach.  .99 repeating is a number.  It doesn't approach anything, it doesn't move on the number line.  It has a place on the number line, and that place is 1.

And a function can't have a value for .99 repeating if its undefined at 1.  How the hell would you check to try to find it?


--------------------
My name is Mud

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: blewmeanie]
    #11277761 -

blewmeanie, I think the first two equations are flawed, in fact. In my opnion, strictly speaking, 1/3 ≈ 0.333rep; not 1/3=0.333rep. Then again, it's a matter of semantics. For actual support of my statement, refer to my post on limits above.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11277799 -

DragonChaser said:
And a function can't have a value for .99 repeating if its undefined at 1.  How the hell would you check to try to find it?



Exactly. Hence, they are not the same. It doesn't matter what limit the function approaches, the fact is that its value is undefined at 0.99rep. and it doesn't exist on 1. How can they be the same as they apparently behave differently?

Quote:
This has been proven countless times by countless mathematicians.



Well, I'm not a mathematician, so I only have some basic knowledge to rely on. What do these countless mathematicians offer to support your statement? I'm willing to accept that I'm wrong, but just not quite yet :wink:

And yes, I accept that you probably know a lot more on the subject than me, but I don't fully understand your argument yet, so please enlighten me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11277803 -

Once again, your post on limits has absolutely no bearing on what we're talking about.

http://polymathematics.typepad.com/polymath/2006/06/no_im_sorry_it_.html

Read through this if you don't believe .99 rep=1.

Have you taken proofs courses, or real analysis?  Real Analysis is also referred to as "Advanced Calc".  So don't think you can take your calc 1 understanding of a limit and apply it to this situation.  A function CANNOT have a limit at .99 repeating if it doesn't have a limit at 1.

Like I said before, if two numbers do not equal each other, then you can find their difference.  If you can't find the difference, it doesn't exist.
If you claim .99rep isn't 1, then find me its difference.  Whats 1-.99rep?


--------------------
My name is Mud

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11277807 -

DragonChaser said:
koraks said:
DragonChaser said:
The DIFFERENCE between .99 repeating and 1 DOES NOT EXIST.




I disagree; think of a limit. A function may have a valid value for x=0.99 recurring, but not for x=1. Hence, they are not the same.



It doesn't matter if you disagree.  This has been proven countless times by countless mathematicians.




Exactly the reason I love and hate math, but this is true. 1 = 9/9 = 9 x 1/9 = 9 x .1111etc = .9999 etc, transitive property and so forth. wiki it if your unfamiliar.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11277812 -

DragonChaser said:
Whats 1-.99rep?



0.00rep, which you will argue to be equal to 0.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11277813 -

koraks said:
DragonChaser said:
And a function can't have a value for .99 repeating if its undefined at 1.  How the hell would you check to try to find it?



Exactly. Hence, they are not the same. It doesn't matter what limit the function approaches, the fact is that its value is undefined at 0.99rep. and it doesn't exist on 1. How can they be the same as they apparently behave differently?




I don't even know what the hell you're talking about here.  What you should have said here, if you understood what I was saying was "Hence, they are the same".


--------------------
My name is Mud

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11277819 -

DragonChaser said:
http://polymathematics.typepad.com/polymath/2006/06/no_im_sorry_it_.html




Thanks for that btw, I'm gonna read that :thumbup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11277832 -

DragonChaser said:
koraks said:
DragonChaser said:
And a function can't have a value for .99 repeating if its undefined at 1.  How the hell would you check to try to find it?



Exactly. Hence, they are not the same. It doesn't matter what limit the function approaches, the fact is that its value is undefined at 0.99rep. and it doesn't exist on 1. How can they be the same as they apparently behave differently?




I don't even know what the hell you're talking about here.  What you should have said here, if you understood what I was saying was "Hence, they are the same".



I'm sorry, I misread your post. I didn't know x=.99rep by definition doesn't have a value for a function with a limit at x=1.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11277852 -

koraks said:
Well, I'm not a mathematician, so I only have some basic knowledge to rely on. What do these countless mathematicians offer to support your statement? I'm willing to accept that I'm wrong, but just not quite yet :wink:




DragonChaser said:
If X doesn't equal Y, then there is a real number Z (the difference between X and Y) such that X+Z=Y. (this is just a property of real numbers)
X=.99 repeating
Y=1
You can't solve for Z.  Z doesn't exist.  The DIFFERENCE between .99 repeating and 1 DOES NOT EXIST.




This is one basic proof.
But if you haven't taken proofs courses, if you don't understand how proofs work, it won't mean much.

Another would be to assume that X doesn't equal Y, .99 rep doesn't equal 1.

If you claim .99rep<1, then by properties of the real numbers, there are an infinite many real numbers between .99rep and 1.  But there aren't.


--------------------
My name is Mud

Edited by DragonChaser (10/19/09 02:46 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11277870 -

koraks said:
I'm sorry, I misread your post. I didn't know x=.99rep by definition doesn't have a value for a function with a limit at x=1.



No no no...

I'm saying if you have a function like (x^2 - 1)/(x-1), it would be defined everywhere except for x=1.  Right?  You can factor the numerator as (x-1)(x+1) then cancel the (x-1) in the numerator and the denominator.  The limit as x approaches 1 would be 2, right?

This function exists everywhere, except at x=1.  To me it sounded like you were claiming that it could have a value at x=.99rep, I'm saying it can't, specifically because .99rep=1.  But lets ignore that for a moment, because the point is to prove that .99 DOES equal 1.  If you think the function has a value at .99rep, then let me just ask you, what is it?


--------------------
My name is Mud

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11277890 -

I follow your explanation, but still (and I know what position I'm in attempting to discuss this, but I enjoy the argument)...

Quote:
If you think the function has a value at .99rep, then let me just ask you, what is it?



It's infinitely close to 2, but just not quite, in my imagination.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11278018 -

koraks said:
DragonChaser said:
The DIFFERENCE between .99 repeating and 1 DOES NOT EXIST.




I disagree; think of a limit. A function may have a valid value for x=0.99 recurring, but not for x=1. Hence, they are not the same.



the difference is 10^-x were x goes to infinity :goose:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: koraks]
    #11278027 -

And if you take that limit, you get zero when you evaluate.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: purified]
    #11278048 -

.9 repeating doesn't equal 1. It approaches the asymptote at 1, getting closer and closer but never actually reaching it if you were to graph this.

Fractions are exact, decimal representations of fractions are not exact, they are approximations. In some cases they are exact, such as 1/4 = .25 . This is not the rule, these kind of fractions are an exception to the rule. Pi is an example of another fraction which cannot be represented as a decimal number, but can be exactly represented as a fraction.

Practically speaking, as far as engineering goes even .9999 can be considered equivalent to 1 because it is "close enough," depending on what tolerances you are dealing with.

Mathematically speaking, .3 repeating * .3 repeating = .9 repeating, not 1.
If you punch this into a calculator it will say that it is equal to 1, this is because a calculator is a computer, and it is limited to a certain number of digits depending on the number of bits the processor can handle, so it rounds the answer.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: learningtofly]
    #11278051 -

And that's not a real number.

Sorry Koraks if I was a dick earlier, I'm just stressed.  I've got 2 weeks of Partial Differential Equations homework to catch up on, an Advanced calc test to study for, advanced calc homework due, a chapter I have to write for a textbook due Wednesday that I haven't started, about a months worth of work for Lie Algebras to do, and I didn't even get to have a good weekend, I was writing programs for a probabilities course all weekend, or I was at work.  I've been up since 6 because I'm tutoring at a local high school, and I work nights at a video store.

So basically... I'm stressed out.


--------------------
My name is Mud

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: purified]
    #11278065 -

purified said:
.9 repeating doesn't equal 1. It approaches the asymptote at 1, getting closer and closer but never actually reaching it if you were to graph this.

Fractions are exact, decimal representations of fractions are not exact, they are approximations. In some cases they are exact, such as 1/4 = .25 . This is not the rule, these kind of fractions are an exception to the rule. Pi is an example of another fraction which cannot be represented as a decimal number, but can be exactly represented as a fraction.

Practically speaking, as far as engineering goes even .9999 can be considered equivalent to 1 because it is "close enough," depending on what tolerances you are dealing with.

Mathematically speaking, .3 repeating * .3 repeating = .9 repeating, not 1.
If you punch this into a calculator it will say that it is equal to 1, this is because a calculator is a computer, and it is limited to a certain number of digits depending on the number of bits the processor can handle, so it rounds the answer.




Pi is an example of another fraction which cannot be represented as a decimal number, but can be exactly represented as a fraction.

pi is irrational and therefor cannot be represented as a fraction brah

:coaster:


--------------------

Edited by learningtofly (10/19/09 03:17 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: learningtofly]
    #11278136 -

Everyone in this thread got trolled lol

But yeah: 0.99999...infinitely repeating=1

It's not close. It's not almost 1. It's 1.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: DragonChaser]
    #11278138 -

DragonChaser said:
So basically... I'm stressed out.



Yeah, no harm done there :thumbup: Good luck with the work, it's a bitch.

I still haven't accepted it fully, but I find it hard to support my doubt without falling back on semantics.

Quote:
pi is irrational and therefor cannot be represented as a fraction brah



tis true, I'm afraid.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: .99999 repeating doesn't equal 1 [Re: WyattsTorch]
    #11278166 -

WyattsTorch said:
Everyone in this thread got trolled lol

But yeah: 0.99999...infinitely repeating=1

It's not close. It's not almost 1. It's 1.



no it's not. It's really close but it's not 1.

Lim    f(x)=x+1
x->1

will never = 2 cuz x DOESNT EQUAL 1


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  [ show all ]

Myyco.com Shop: Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Quick chemistry question FirstAvailable 1,554 11 04/01/04 06:14 PM
by FirstAvailable
* Recreational Chemistry gdman 531 0 10/06/04 11:27 AM
by gdman
* A priest doesn't like me
( 1 2 all )
lukeboots 3,088 25 12/03/04 04:24 PM
by psilocybinjunkie
* Sut Jhally on AR tonight (repeat) GnuBobo 347 0 09/06/04 12:05 AM
by GnuBobo
* Top 10 Reasons MJshroomer doesn't answer my Private Message: GGreatOne234 1,632 7 09/17/03 05:27 PM
by Its Pat
* Anyone here that doesn't do drugs, clean/sober?
( 1 2 all )
SoulSurfer 4,329 29 12/17/04 06:43 AM
by Supernova
* Who says God doesn't have a sense of humor? SkorpivoMusterion 1,139 10 12/27/03 01:36 AM
by DailyPot
* Good schools offering organic chemistry? earlyxsunsets 252 0 09/17/04 11:53 AM
by earlyxsunsets

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
5,703 topic views. 0 members, 1,999 guests and 141 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.034 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.