You do not have a complete picture of Christian theology based on what you've said. Firstly, while you ARE correct that 'right faith' is necessary (the 8-Fold Path in Buddhism also requires 'right faith'), most Christians have no idea that the title 'son of God' was an Old Testament title for any King of Israel. Those who believed that Jesus was the promised Messiah [Christ], meant that as King, He carried the Divine Right of Kingship - that He was 'a man anointed by God' to be King. The Greek word Christ [Christos] means anointed, as in when one has Holy Oil ['Chrism,' same root word] poured on one's head ("...he anointest my head with oil..." - 23rd Psalm). The Hebrew word is Messiah [Messhiach]. Jesus the Christ, therefore was one's King, but not in a political sense (the sense for which he was allegedly executed - sedition - claiming to be King of Judea). He was King of the Kingdom of Heaven. He manifested what human life would be like if one was living in the Kingdom of Heaven. He was the spiritual head or leader. He leads the Way. In fact the early Christians called themselves "The Way." It referred to 'The Way to be' - compassionate, merciful, loving, altruistic (all of these means ego-transcending). Heaven begins in this present embodied life in the world, but it transcends death and one awakens into a spiritual existence out of the body, or, as was formulated later, in a 'resurrection body' which remains an undescribed Mystery in Christian theology. The Tao in Taoism also means 'The Way.' I understand it to be the same Way. Thus, to be in Tao for the Taoist, is phenomenologically identical to being in Christ for the Christian. Christians don't agree for the most part because they are abysmally ignorant of the meanings of their own religion and even more ignorant of other religions.
The 'Vicarious Sacrifice' theology that you refer to is actually the part that many early Christians objected to - that the 'atoning death' of Jesus 'cleanses' us of our sins (thoughts/actions which separate us from awareness of God/Heaven). This language is the language of mythos, NOT the language of psychology that we know today which has the concept of assuming personal responsibility - which means internalizing the power to change within our own personal loci. The ancients didn't think this way and in fact ancient Hebrews didn't talk about 'eternal life,' because of the absence of this individualistic thinking. For ancient Hebrews, it was all about the survival of Israel, not personally experienced Heaven. It was Greek thought, with its idea of immortality that underwent changes into 'eternal life' in the Kingdom of Heaven. These individualistic thinking trends were not the beliefs of orthodox Christian thought which was 'forced' on Christians by the 3rd century, but rather, they were held by a majority of Christians who later killed off by the orthodoxy - the Gnostic Christians. The Gnostic Christians brought the mythic language of Christian doctrine into symbolic and psychological levels so that one could DO something with them internally! C.G. Jung called the Gnostics the first depth psychologists.
The mechanism of Karma is reflected in different Biblical contexts, Old Testament and New: “…whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” (Galatians 6:7); "He who lives by the sword dies by the sword." - Matt 26:52; "He that soweth iniquity shall reap vanity: and the rod of his anger shall fail." - Proverbs 22:8 are examples.
I have a very important place for Buddhism in my life. I wear a bracelet with The Great Mantra of the Vajrayana, I have two 8' vertical prayer flags in my back yard and the room in which I type is decorated with Tibetan Buddhist art. I wrote a 222 page doctoral dissertation on Tibetan Buddhism and Western Psychology and I have met notable Tibetan Buddhist lamas, watched sand mandalas being constructed, received Kalachakra initiation, and I have sat before the Dalai Lama. Nevertheless, while Buddhism recognizes only the Transpersonal Absolute, Christianity recognizes the Transpersonal Absolute (Godhead) as well as the Personal God. For myself, God is at least personal, definately Transpersonal, but not less than personal. Therefore, having a personal aspect, interpersonal prayer becomes a mode of communication. Not only is Transpersonal Union possible in the Kingdom of God, but personal communion is possible with what Eastern Orthodox Christians call "The Uncreated Energies" of God. Interfacing with the human consciousness (which ancients called 'spirit' [pneuma]), even petitionary prayer is possible in Christianity, whereas it is not possible in Buddhism.
This is only my testimony and explanation. Everyone has their own priorities. Buddha lived contemporaneously with Plato, a world apart. Buddhism may have actually influenced Socrates and Plato, and hence Christianity into which Platonic thought entered, but this is a different discussion. I see Buddha and Plato as the world's two greatest philosophers - East and West. I see Jesus/Y'shua/Issa as the Logos of God, even though I reject the virgin birth and other mythological embellishments. In fact, Jesus represents The Way (to be) even if He never existed as a historical human being (the conclusion of many Gnostics and of the modern theologian-physician Albert Schweitzer).
I hope this was somewhat clarifying, or at least entertaining.
Peace.
- MtG
-------------------- γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself
|