Quote:

now blow that up for the big picture. And fix education.
Ideas??

---

BlueCoyote said:

For me, trying has to do with dishonest intent (in the farthest sense).
Yes, maybe definitions.

---

Then in this case, yes, it's definitely definitions.
Fucking labels

BlueCoyote said:

And in a zoned-out sense (of 'try'): If a coyote is dancing through and around the feet of a person, he only may do that because he will imitate the notion of him 'trying' to perform something, but in reality, he will only want to let the perceiver still look as if he would have a chance to prevent what the coyote already is doing
[sorry couldn't resist]
And yes, this still is really strongly related to the topic ()

---

moon_glue said:

thanks for stating the obvious.

---

If it were so obvious, then I wouldn't have stated it. I didn't mention that fire burns in this thread.

Quote:

The idea of generations is to ROUGHLY DEFINE something.

---

Quote:

The generation time line just attempts to illustrate the differences in the mentality due to the world an age defined population grows up in, in case you missed that.

---

Yes, it attempts to, yet inevitably fails. What date does the "Y generation" start and stop? What world events influence this and distinguish the difference amongst generations? Doesn't the world change in every moment? Shouldn't there be a distinct generation for the people born in every month? How does the variance in the environment in which groups of people are born effect their mentality, and subsequently their place in this "generation"?

Sorry, but the notion that these assigned "generations" convey any actual truth regarding the individual characteristics of the people that suspossedly comprise it is bunk, and that is truth. Employing the term "Y generation" has conveyed absolutely no meaning or substance.