Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

North Spore Shop: Bulk Substrate

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: Pro Tools [Re: Colonel Kurtz Ph.D]
    #6602291 -

Colonel Kurtz Ph.D said:
psilocyberin said:
Studios that made their money from demo's are dying out, because even a kid in his room with an 002 can make something with enough clarity to be handed over to labels or posted on Myspace.... but 95% of albums which go gold and above will all need the resources of a professional recording studio.

also, everything you talked about above is limited by your computing power, and not the platform/DAW.



You should really read more about the recording industry and computer based recording.

A GOOD home studio can put out more than enough quality for 95% of pop/rock recordings if you know how to use your resources, EXCEPT if you really want to push the compression on the record, then you'd need some good mastering studio. Eq, stereo imaging etc should be done at mixing and not mastering, and can be done in any good home studio.

Also, DAW limitations ARE important, how can you dissmiss the importance of the system controlling your hardware? You can't use your hard to full potential with the wrong soft, and viceversa..

BTW, those albums that go gold you were talking about usually don't get there because they're recorded on a professional studio, but because they're promoted by professional publishers and advertisers.
Nowadays image is way more important than music in pop music :shrug:




lol.... ill admit that my knowledge on DAW's is lacking over the last few years.... but I am in touch with the "recording industry", and here is where I know what I am talking about.
Let me ask you this, if a company is going to spend all this money on image, dont you think they will spend a good amount of money on having the album done fully professional?
"uh.... here is 20 grand for this months advertising, and here is a few hundred bucks to go track at your buddies home studio.... im sure it will turn out just as good as if we spent 10 grand for you to go to sound kitchen."

Please, dont lecture me on how the recording industry works, before I went fully into live sound, I spent about 5 years at 3 different recording studios in 3 different cities. Check out Festival studios in New Orleans and Dark Horse in Nashville. One was cubase and 2-inch and  Dark horse had basically everything, but was primarily pro-tools.
I have done television shows and worked on Cinemax comedy hours (mixed in 5.1), helped build/install Galactic's studio in New Orleans.....

so please, dont tell me dick about the recording industry.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Pro Tools [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #6603032 -

Quote:
"uh.... here is 20 grand for this months advertising, and here is a few hundred bucks to go track at your buddies home studio.... im sure it will turn out just as good as if we spent 10 grand for you to go to sound kitchen."



:lol: That's not what I meant, I know a lot of money goes into recording professionally. I'm just saying pop music doesn't really make full use of the studios capabilities most of the times IMHO.
Obviously everything is going to sound better when recorded at Electric Ladyland Studios than in a (good) home studio, but most people certainly can't tell the difference.


--------------------
:whatwhat:

There's no better way to rock out than with your cock out!!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Pro Tools [Re: adamj]
    #6603054 -

If your going to make music b/c you love it, get protools.  Change the music world do whatever.  If your thinking about the $$$ at any time during your music making process

STOP YOUR FUCKING UP THE GAME. :spank:


--------------------
"Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war that we know about peace, more about killing that we know about living."

General Omar N. Bradley

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Pro Tools [Re: Colonel Kurtz Ph.D]
    #6603387 -

Colonel Kurtz Ph.D said:
Quote:
"uh.... here is 20 grand for this months advertising, and here is a few hundred bucks to go track at your buddies home studio.... im sure it will turn out just as good as if we spent 10 grand for you to go to sound kitchen."



:lol: That's not what I meant, I know a lot of money goes into recording professionally. I'm just saying pop music doesn't really make full use of the studios capabilities most of the times IMHO.
Obviously everything is going to sound better when recorded at Electric Ladyland Studios than in a (good) home studio, but most people certainly can't tell the difference.



actually, pop music utilizes it the most, because most pop stars are so talentless that by the end, everything has been tweaked and autotuned and triggered that no actual raw recording is left.

real recording studios have so much external gear that it will take atleast 10 more years before software even comes close to reproducing the capabilities of a studio.

also, studios dont just provide killer pre-amps, 2-inch machines, great mixing and a comfortable, professional environment, they also can provide incredible studio musicians and other people who are professional and knowledgable about the recording/producing process.

FYI- check out an aural exciter, almost every single album you have ever listened to has been run through an aural exciter..... this is just one of the thousands of things knowledgable recording engineers and producers do to get a "professional" sound. Sure you can go to school, learn how to track with pristine clarity and maybe even mix and pan properly and even know how to use verb/delay/compression accurately... but there are so many little details and tricks that take years of industry exposure/experience to learn.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Pro Tools [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #6604839 -

I'm using aural excitement in my home-recorded album too, as well as auto-tuning :grin:

Dude I'm an audio engineer too :yesnod: I'll agree that an experienced engineer is the most important part of a mix, but home recording has come a long way, that's all.


--------------------
:whatwhat:

There's no better way to rock out than with your cock out!!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

North Spore Shop: Bulk Substrate


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* disappointed with pro tools le, what should i get next? Vats of Blood 1,221 12 03/23/04 06:18 PM
by Middleman
* protools DR. PRIME 577 5 03/15/07 09:03 PM
by DR. PRIME
* SHOW YOUR TOOLS AND SKILLS. (A.H.P. COMP.) Fliquid 1,158 13 03/03/03 01:54 AM
by doCtR_diSCreeT
* The future of Tool Murex 2,885 12 09/21/03 07:57 PM
by Gasoline15
* what is a good electric guitar- computer interface? TravILLer 884 4 05/23/07 03:58 PM
by Colonel Kurtz Ph.D
* My First Pro Tools Mix Observer 282 0 01/02/06 11:14 PM
by Observer
* No licensed Kontakt 4 in Protools 8.0.3 FGL 634 5 07/08/10 02:17 PM
by bourndead
* New Tool Album Review
( 1 2 all )
MiddlemanM 5,320 21 03/09/06 08:50 PM
by barfightlard

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, automan, DividedQuantum
2,235 topic views. 0 members, 4 guests and 6 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 15 queries.