Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October
    #4994495 -

Doesn't seem to be quite the exodus of neanderthals the moonbats seem to have wished for:
/www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2005/11/mil-051110-dod01.htm
.
Right on target or slightly above.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4994572 -

What with stop loss, lowered recruiting goals and lowered recruiting standards what were you expecting?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4994616 -

its not News unless a soldier fucks up or dies...

but the MSM can fix this story!



"Bad Economy Forces Poor to Seek Military Service",

or "Military Lowers Standards to Meet Goals".


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: lonestar2004]
    #4994656 -

Do we have anything to compare this too? Like past months/years/etc.?


--------------------
...the whole experience is (and is as) a profound piece of knowledge.  It is an indellible experience; it is forever known.  I have known myself in a way I doubt I would have ever occurred except as it did.

Smith, P.  Bull. Menninger Clinic (1959) 23:20-27; p. 27.

...most subjects find the experience valuable, some find it frightening, and many say that is it uniquely lovely.

Osmond, H.  Annals, NY Acad Science (1957) 66:418-434; p.436

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: lonestar2004]
    #4994659 -



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: Solutarch]
    #4994665 -

Solutarch said:
What with stop loss, lowered recruiting goals and lowered recruiting standards what were you expecting?



.
You and your ilk to say this.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4995281 -

zappaisgod said:
Solutarch said:
What with stop loss, lowered recruiting goals and lowered recruiting standards what were you expecting?



.
You and your ilk to say this.



My ilk? You must mean rational people who are intelligent enough to recognize that government provided statistics are designed for public consumption, that the numbers are gathered under carefully selected parameters designed to produce results that will bolster in the minds of uncritical thinkers, the perceptions that the government wants them to have.

Let's go back a few months and take a look at this article, dated June 9, 2005. In the article Keith Olbermann states, "According to The New York Times, the Army?s original aim was to get 8,050 new recruits in May. It then scaled that number back, without making that news public, to 6,700. But it only got 5,000. That?s 63 percent of the original goal, 75 percent of the revised goal. Even that doesn?t guarantee that there will be 5,000 new soldiers ready for combat. In 2004, 14 percent, nearly, of all the new recruits dropped out after initial training. And that number jumped to more than 17 percent this year." Then we can look at your link (from Nov 10, 2005) which lists the newer goal at an even lower 4,700.

I did notice that you avoided a comment on how these statistics in your link have been affected by lowered recruitment goals, lowered standards and stop loss, but instead just gave a simple admission that you would expect intelligent people (my ilk) to bring the point up.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4996045 -

zappaisgod said:
Doesn't seem to be quite the exodus of neanderthals the moonbats seem to have wished for:
/www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2005/11/mil-051110-dod01.htm
.
Right on target or slightly above.



Nevertheless, it's high time you joined up. Why are you still here?


--------------------
Sarcasm just one of my many talents.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: LucidDream]
    #4997570 -

Because I'm 49 years old. They won't take me.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: Solutarch]
    #4998098 -

Solutarch said:
What with stop loss, lowered recruiting goals and lowered recruiting standards what were you expecting?



It does kind of make the numbers less meaningful than they would have been in the past.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: gregorio]
    #4998215 -

The Army planned on increasing size by 30,000 over a period of a couple years. Last year the goal was to meet this increase in size. The goal wasn't met, but the Army is still trying to grow. This is a lot different than meeting normal recruiting goals. Marines, Navy, and Air Force has had no problems getting recruits. November and October the Army did let in a larger amount of low-scoring recruits, but they say this was just during those months that are normally slow for recruiting. The lower scores won't be accepted in later months.


--------------------
I am in love with Acidic_Sloth


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: looner2]
    #4998291 -

I hope that is true because one of the reasons that I have always heard being put force as one reason the military was not in favor of a draft was because they only wanted the best and the brightest.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: gregorio]
    #4998348 -

I think the biggest reason they don't want a draft is the level of commitment of draftees. Volunteers want to be in the military. Draftees do not. Best and brightest? I don't think that was ever possible outside of the officer corps from the academies. It is no mean feat to get accepted at one of the service academies.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: gregorio]
    #4998422 -

gregorio said:
I hope that is true because one of the reasons that I have always heard being put force as one reason the military was not in favor of a draft was because they only wanted the best and the brightest.



Like zappa said, it is more about morale. A soldier who wants to be there will be a better soldier. Especially the recruits joining now. They know they will most likely go to war. All the "college money" fellas left over from before 9/11 got out.


--------------------
I am in love with Acidic_Sloth


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Recruitment and re-enlistment numbers for October [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5000736 -

zappaisgod said:
Because I'm 49 years old. They won't take me.



Oh, they've really softened up on that age thing. All kinds of special dispensations these days. You'd be surprised.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Almost assaulted by Army recruiter while holding my 2yr old son...
( 1 2 3 all )
myndreach 4,382 58 07/30/05 11:28 AM
by myndreach
* Pentagon wants to raise age limit for recruits trendalM 449 0 07/22/05 12:06 PM
by trendal
* Re-enlist or go private? Phred 991 11 04/04/04 03:06 PM
by Learyfan
* Military recruitment RandalFlagg 1,206 12 12/27/04 03:52 PM
by newuser1492
* The nation's drug czar recruited local religious leaders Sat Static 750 12 07/14/03 11:03 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* Bush by numbers: Four years of double standards Xlea321 538 2 09/06/04 11:43 AM
by Strumpling
* Protesters chase away military recruiters
( 1 2 3 4 all )
RandalFlagg 4,615 60 05/04/05 06:42 AM
by 1stimer
* Resistance movement militia numbers 200,000...and they want us out CJay 638 6 01/11/05 10:43 AM
by CJay

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
810 topic views. 2 members, 189 guests and 45 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.