Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: Mushroom_Madness]
    #772509 -

Mushroom Madness, I like your revised idea. Sounds very feesable to me!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: Mushroom_Madness]
    #773287 -

- Post History Deleted Upon User's Request -

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: Mushroom_Madness]
    #773635 -

I don't think allowing a low number of posts before charging the fee is not very good, because malicious folks can still create lots of socks and only use them each 30 times or whatever, and it doesn't take many posts to create antagonism. I do not think such a compromise is necessary, as anyone who has the resources to visit this site would have the resources to pay the fee or write an essay.

This is not a high fee, its not actually a fee since they can write the essay, and the everyone will still have access to all information gathered, they just won't be able to ask questions or add info until they pony up. So it will not prevent the knowledge here from being spread. I am not advocating making the forums so that non-users cannot read them.

Thanks for the input people, I'm still convinced this is a good idea though. Keep the discussion rolling, I really wonder why the admin's haven't spoken on this officially.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: djfrog]
    #4075741 -

I still think they shoudl tax babies and gas.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: djfrog]
    #4076456 -

No need to tax gas, just strip the subsidies and show the people the real cost without the gas companies benefiting.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: djfrog]
    #4076495 -

I think that the shroomery is based on the idea of freedom of speech and freedom of information. While it may seem like a good idea to keep the underage posters/trolls away, this is why there is a rating system, so people can immediatly (ususally) weed out good/bad advice given to them.

Also, is an admin or a mod really going to want to read hundreds of essays? People on this site will be viewed for the information that they present/discuss, and charging or demanding a written essay to join a "club" is pretty beat.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: Boom]
    #4076552 -

The system that they use now to expose and eliminate puppets seems to be working fine. Puppets usually last about 5 minutes in OTD. I wouldn't add anything to the registration page.


--------------------
Through the excercise of patience, one may learn humility..

Smoke plenty of green, and eat fungus!!!!
:peace::heart::slomo::gd_icon::gd_icon::gd_icon::slomo:


Trip Report

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: djfrog]
    #4080839 -

why dig this thread up?


--------------------
Use the Fucking Reply To Feature You Lazy Pieces of Shit!

afoaf said:
Jim, if you were in my city, I would let you fuck my wife.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: Jim]
    #4100870 -

heh I don't know. I can't really explain without bumping the thread. And now that I've had to bump, I don't have an explanation. dig?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: yet another idea for reducing sock count [Re: djfrog]
    #4101627 -

Mods keep the sock count down... but OM me if you have an extra $5!

:smile:


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Idea: A new rating system
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 Murex 9,727 62 06/01/03 07:08 PM
by blaze2
* Eliminate the post count psyko78626 2,158 18 07/27/02 09:33 AM
by Papaver
* Re: Shroomery Movie and Music reviews! A good Idea really! Anonymous 1,466 10 11/13/99 10:16 PM
by Rainbow
* Puppet Troll MADNESS forum. Sock segregation! dubt 1,263 3 06/24/02 07:31 AM
by sir tripsalot
* Re: Information on the Neurological Functioning of Psilocin/Psilocybin BrAiN 917 1 05/14/98 07:54 PM
by Anonymous
* Re: some useful information Anonymous 615 1 12/20/99 09:14 PM
by Aphex
* rate counts going up and down Innvertigo 1,418 13 12/06/02 01:35 AM
by Joshua
* Re: Counting hits Aphex 478 2 07/30/00 01:16 PM
by Captain Jack

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Ythan, Thor, Seuss, geokills
4,272 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 17 queries.