Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  [ show all ]
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter]
    #25975217 -

Okay Yang bro. Secure this.



--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: Great Scott]
    #25975221 -

When Yang wins the congress will quake and shiver in fear!


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter]
    #25975245 -

YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


--------------------
"I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.” - Gandalf The Grey.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

"I like to think of Jesus like with giant eagle's wings, and singin' lead vocals for Lynyrd Skynyrd with like an angel band and I'm in the front row and I'm HAMMERED DRUNK!" - Cal Naughton Jr. AKA The Magic Man. Abracadabra homes!

"Each tear is a drop of poison released." - Anonymous

"Could it be you're afraid of what your friends might say if they knew you believe in God above? They should realize before they criticize that God is the only way to Love."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: LRG] * 3
    #25975253 -

LRG said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


Yes from his posts that I have seen that is indeed the case. His rhetoric is identical to them. Now he may not call himself one but if it walks like a duck... Some white nationalists are a bit more stealth in there approach but Great Scott is literally talking about Jewish conspiracy theories in this very thread.


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: LRG]
    #25975254 -

We must secure the existence of our bags and a future for AZN presidents.


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter]
    #25975260 -

I accepted a private debate.

I also accepted an open debate just like we normally do. Out in the open.

If Shiva is only willing to debate on his terms or not at all, then it's his issue. I'm sure other people will converse about the issue with me.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter]
    #25975262 -

I'm still waiting for Shiva to tell me why family values are bad.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter] * 2
    #25975267 -

YangSupporter said:
LRG said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


Yes from his posts that I have seen that is indeed the case. His rhetoric is identical to them. Now he may not call himself one but if it walks like a duck... Some white nationalists are a bit more stealth in there approach but Great Scott is literally talking about Jewish conspiracy theories in this very thread.


His posts about minorities being parasites feeding off of white people, and fascism being a reasonable response to the threat of communism help paint the picture too.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom] * 1
    #25975272 -

Yes indeed very disturbing.


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: XUL] * 1
    #25975275 -

XUL said:
I'm still waiting for Shiva to tell me why family values are bad.


In a formal debate, the onus would be on you to first make the case for why they are good.

See, this is why I want to hold you to a formal structure, because you don't debate honestly otherwise. The terms I propose in the OP are more than reasonable, if you don't want to agree to them, and you can't propose your own terms (and no, private or informal debate is not an alternative to formal public debate), than you are unwillingly to debate. Simple as that.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom] * 2
    #25975278 -

Xul there are conservative arguments that you can make in a formal debate structure. If you think they are superior you shouldn't have anything to worry about.


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom] * 1
    #25975279 -

You're in bondage to political correctness. The world will never appear to you as it is until you unloose those shackles.


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter]
    #25975280 -

YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.


Pointing out the insanity and hypocrisy associated by the PC movement is hardly "white nationalism".

Trump didn't create MAGA and "white nationalism", the PC movement did.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: qman] * 2
    #25975282 -

qman said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.


Pointing out the insanity and hypocrisy associated by the PC movement is hardly "white nationalism".
No but thats not what Great Scott is doing he is spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories which is white nationalism. He has referred to minorities as parasites thats white nationlism.

Trump didn't create MAGA and "white nationalism", the PC movement did.
No white nationalism is an offshoot of some very old pseudo scientific ideas about race. White nationalism is the latest iteration of this ideology but its been around a long time.



Responses in bold.


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #25975285 -

YangSupporter said:
LRG said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


Yes from his posts that I have seen that is indeed the case. His rhetoric is identical to them. Now he may not call himself one but if it walks like a duck... Some white nationalists are a bit more stealth in there approach but Great Scott is literally talking about Jewish conspiracy theories in this very thread.



Well, I'm white and a patriot AKA nationalist. Certainly not a fan of Zionism either.

What's wrong with Jewish conspiracies? Are you the type to discredit every conspiracy or any person who entertains them? The Jews kind of are Zionists, it's not exactly a conspiracy and it isn't exclusive to Jews either.

shivas.wisdom said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.


YangSupporter said:
LRG said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


Yes from his posts that I have seen that is indeed the case. His rhetoric is identical to them. Now he may not call himself one but if it walks like a duck... Some white nationalists are a bit more stealth in there approach but Great Scott is literally talking about Jewish conspiracy theories in this very thread.


His posts about minorities being parasites feeding off of white people, and fascism being a reasonable response to the threat of communism help paint the picture too.


Link 1: That's a gross misrepresentation. He didn't say that there. Find something else.

Link 2: I would choose my words more carefully and say fascism is a way to combat communism. Obviously, shouldn't be applauded but as a historical argument with hindsight it's not obscene.

He's certainly not as simple minded as you make him out to be. I don't gather he's a white supremacist... yes that is what I hear when you say white nationalist, correct me if I'm wrong. He seems more willing to engage in good faith arguments than you suggest and takes precarious positions, which is something I can respect to an extent.


--------------------
"I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.” - Gandalf The Grey.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

"I like to think of Jesus like with giant eagle's wings, and singin' lead vocals for Lynyrd Skynyrd with like an angel band and I'm in the front row and I'm HAMMERED DRUNK!" - Cal Naughton Jr. AKA The Magic Man. Abracadabra homes!

"Each tear is a drop of poison released." - Anonymous

"Could it be you're afraid of what your friends might say if they knew you believe in God above? They should realize before they criticize that God is the only way to Love."

Edited by LRG (05/06/19 08:44 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #25975286 -

shivas.wisdom said:
XUL said:
I'm still waiting for Shiva to tell me why family values are bad.


In a formal debate, the onus would be on you to first make the case for why they are good.

See, this is why I want to hold you to a formal structure, because you don't debate honestly otherwise. The terms I propose in the OP are more than reasonable, if you don't want to agree to them, and you can't propose your own terms (and no, private or informal debate is not an alternative to formal public debate), than you are unwillingly to debate. Simple as that.


Interesting. What are your thoughts on this "argument" ---> "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Do you suppose there are certain root truths that cannnot be proven via debate, but rather, are simply self-evident?


--------------------
:thumbup: :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: YangSupporter] * 3
    #25975289 -

YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.


To be honest, when I made this thread I didn't really expect any of our far-right leaning members to actually formally debate me. Assuming you aren't someone's puppet, you'll eventually find that the more clever ones here are fairly careful to avoid getting pinned down - something that a formal debate makes impossible.

Still, as you say, the silence following each refusal to debate rings its own bell. Especially considering quite a few on this forum have accused me (and the left in general) of being unwilling to debate far-right positions because we don't want to face "difficult truths", so we shut the conversation down before it can even start. Turns out reality is quite the opposite.

I do hope that someone will step up though, because I'm honestly interested in trying my hand at a more formal style. I guess it will probably be a lefty who does eventually.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #25975291 -

Why is it on me?

You initially said Candace Owens was racist for supporting family values, conservative values, and moving black people off welfare towards independence.

It seems like the onus is on you.

Why are family values bad?

Why is moving away from welfare toward independence bad?

How does it make you racist?


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: LRG]
    #25975292 -

YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


Yes from his posts that I have seen that is indeed the case. His rhetoric is identical to them. Now he may not call himself one but if it walks like a duck... Some white nationalists are a bit more stealth in there approach but Great Scott is literally talking about Jewish conspiracy theories in this very thread.



Well, I'm white and a patriot AKA nationalist. Certainly not a fan of Zionism either.

What's wrong with Jewish conspiracies? Are you the type to discredit every conspiracy or any person who entertains them? The Jews kind of are Zionists, it's not exactly a conspiracy and it isn't exclusive to Jews either.

shivas.wisdom said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.


YangSupporter said:
LRG said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.



Is he indeed a white nationalist? I'm assuming you're using that as a pejorative and presuming all the rhetoric it implies.


Yes from his posts that I have seen that is indeed the case. His rhetoric is identical to them. Now he may not call himself one but if it walks like a duck... Some white nationalists are a bit more stealth in there approach but Great Scott is literally talking about Jewish conspiracy theories in this very thread.


His posts about minorities being parasites feeding off of white people, and fascism being a reasonable response to the threat of communism help paint the picture too.


Link 1: That's a gross misrepresentation. He didn't say that there. Find something else.

Link 2: I would choose my words more carefully and say fascism is a way to combat communism. Obviously, shouldn't be applauded but as a historical argument with hindsight it's not obscene.

He's certainly not as simple minded as you make him out to be. I don't gather he's a white supremacist... yes that is what I hear when you say white nationalist, correct me if I'm wrong. He seems more willing to engage in good faith arguments than you suggest and takes precarious positions, which is something I can respect to an extent.


The fact you don't see anything wrong with his rhetoric is a bad sign. I know plenty of conservatives who denounce white nationalism its toxic divisive and not the way for conservatives to be taken seriously.


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Formal debate proposals [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #25975294 -

shivas.wisdom said:
YangSupporter said:
The fact Great Scott is unwilling to publicly debate his position formally shows the weakness of the white nationalist arguments.


To be honest, when I made this thread I didn't really expect any of our far-right leaning members to actually formally debate me. Assuming you aren't someone's puppet, you'll eventually find that the more clever ones here are fairly careful to avoid getting pinned down - something that a formal debate makes impossible.

Still, as you say, the silence following each refusal to debate rings its own bell. Especially considering quite a few on this forum have accused me (and the left in general) of being unwilling to debate far-right positions because we don't want to face "difficult truths", so we shut the conversation down before it can even start. Turns out reality is quite the opposite.

I do hope that someone will step up though, because I'm honestly interested in trying my hand at a more formal style. I guess it will probably be a lefty who does eventually.


To be honest I am baffled that a magic mushroom forum has so many far right members :confused:


--------------------
https://youtu.be/cTsEzmFamZ8

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Libertarians & Greens to Debate in Miami
( 1 2 3 all )		 Ancalagon 4,940 49 10/03/04 10:12 PM
by Gijith
* Rasmussen Reports - Badnarik In Debates Ancalagon 1,405 17 07/27/04 04:24 PM
by Ancalagon
* Sick of partisan bickering Silversoul 598 6 09/30/06 12:37 PM
by Gijith
* The Debate was Theatre. methikist 966 9 10/01/04 11:10 AM
by Viaggio
* Kerry cheats at first debate?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )		 Phred 7,027 148 10/05/04 12:53 PM
by Vvellum
* Why don't the third party candidate's have their own debate? Signo 725 9 10/26/04 10:15 PM
by BleaK
* 'Debating' the Iraq War
( 1 2 all )		 Ancalagon 4,329 23 06/20/06 10:51 AM
by zappaisgod
* Russia/China form strategic alliance to counter Western influence SWEDEN 779 2 02/07/05 05:16 PM
by downforpot

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
1,980 topic views. 3 members, 55 guests and 17 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.035 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 18 queries.