qman said:

I won't debate ZOG because the burden is upon the person making the assertion and that's not worth it from my perspective.

What I will debate is that the discussion of Jewish influence (whatever the degree it may actually be in the real world) isn't open for debate today.

---

shivas.wisdom said:

qman said:

I won't debate ZOG because the burden is upon the person making the assertion and that's not worth it from my perspective.

What I will debate is that the discussion of Jewish influence (whatever the degree it may actually be in the real world) isn't open for debate today.

---

Okay, I can agree with this topic.

I guess the next step is to decide who will be the arbitrator(s). Do you have any suggestions for who would be unbiased in this debate? I feel Tantrika and MagicMush123 have shown themselves to be sufficiently non-partisan.

And any preference on how many rounds of rebuttals? I would suggest two.

---

shivas.wisdom said:

... I feel Tantrika and MagicMush123 have shown themselves to be sufficiently non-partisan.
...

---

going to have to regretfully pass
"non-partisan" in my case is prolly mostly due to glossing over and not reading 90% of people's posts
feel it would be either disrespectful or outside the scope of my contributions to try and pass judgements on argument validity

but am at least glad you both have found ways to agree to measures of respectful debate

shivas.wisdom said:

You know, I think you sell yourself. I've seen you provide some pretty good quality commentaries on various subjects when the inspiration strikes. No worries that you'd rather not participate though.

---

Am presently very self-concious about my capacity to keep track of things
went through years of thinking my disconnect from biological reproduction was complete
then recently inquired and found out my previous thought that sperm donations were just to verify vasectomy was necessary was only partial
and instead found out about the actuality of prseservation measures

if not being such a simpleton, prolly would have caught that at the time
am concerned about misapprehending pertinent affairs or concepts from either debator in a similar manner
mostly just think of myself as being here to learn by asking questions and to occasionally speak up about topics from a trans perspective
and the latter would not occur if not for the misfortune that trans matters are so frequently politicized

appreciate the understanding tho

I enjoyed Falcon and Enlil's debate and am looking forward to this one cool idea

XUL said:

And then the leftists in here have literally called for my deportation.

---

Yeah that was funny    wasn't 'sending you to rehab for smoking crack' suggested as well? 
This is the best forum 

shivas.wisdom said:

I'd be fine with it, should qman agree.

---