Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Re: Northern California id [Re: Doc9151]
    #25867859 -

Oh no I misspelled psyciloybin. Once again, nothing to say so let's attack someone's grammar they misspelled in one comment of many others with the spelling being correct. As I've stated, I've only explained this over and over to such a high point because I can't believe you guys still aren't getting it here
Guess I must repeat myself for the 10th time and maybe this time you'll get it, If not I'm truly at a loss and done explaining common sense in multiple ways for someone to finally understand.
Once again, I've said over and over pscilocybin is a chemical and that the genus is scilocybe
And that there is a chemical called pscilocin just like scilocybin, that is also in the spicocybin mushrooms, as well as other mushrooms that are not of the spcilocybin species
There have been many, many accounts of scilocin occurring in other hallucinogic mushrooms that do not contain the partnering chemical pscilocybin. They are all separate chemicals that can either occur together, or on their own, or combined with other chemicals outside of the only mushrooms y'all seem to know, called scilocybin.
There are many other hallucinogenic mushrooms that contain scilocin outside of the scilocybin species although yes it is a partnering chemical.
My words are being laughed at because they've been entirely misunderstood so incredibly much that I've had to explain it multiple times over and over , the same thing I've originally been saying, in a million different ways just for at least a single person to understand it, I am giving different examples of the original thing I am talking about so that you may understand in different ways
Yes the central nervous system does have a lot to do with how both Wellbutrin and mushrooms work, because that is the system in which your brain tells your body anything. But I better not say that before I have to repeat that sentence ten times in different ways for a person to finally click
it in their brain what I mean
Oh and here goes the third time of repeating this just in case you still haven't caught on, I never told this person to try what I did, again. I said people have different body chemistry and that it did this to me. That is purely it. There has been another instance of this documented other than my experience. It can happen, I did not try it because of their report of it either, I found their report because of I trying it for myself, putting myself at risk and no one else.
It was my decision, I have tripped on acid and various other things and have created things of my own experimentation. Can you not see that I said these mushrooms must be studied more, yet I did not tell this person to eat them, or study them in any way I have. I was simply speaking of my knowledge about them to this person, and my own experience that has led me to the conclusion through my long research with them that they do contain traces of pscilocin, or another hallucinogenic chemical that is weakened with in them, due to how much water they retain and various other reasons that are common within any mushroom that can effect the chemical makeup of it, whether the chemicals are present or not, they can be weakened in the mushroom given many factors. But the chemicals are still there, thus can be extracted or brought to life with other partnering chemicals. And this is why the pscilocybin species is the most known hallucinogenic mushroom, they are Hardy and contain plenty of hallucinogenic partnering chemicals in which brings other chemicals out in it, to life. Giving a fullwr effect of each of these chemicals to the consumer.
Here is a great example of what I mean. The nightshade family. Made up of atropine, hyoscyamine and scopolamine
Datura's, a species of this genus is the most hallucinogenic as it mostly contains all three chemicals, in eacah subspecies of datura. Which once again in in the nightshade family. The solanaceae family is so complex because of these chemicals that there are subspecies of species because there are so many plants containing one, or two, or all three of these chemicals on their own, combined with other naturally occurring chemicals unique to those plants that the family has 90 genus's with well over 1,000 species and subspecies that were grouped into these categories because of just 3 chemicals.
So tell me, do you really think that the scilocybin species are the only mushroom that contains it's own 4 chemicals that do not occur in other subspecies given the 1,000 of mushrooms still undiscovered that would be put into this category if the chemicals were investigated? This is how things get grouped together, the chemicals, of many unknown things that connect them because that unknown thing had the same occurring chemical.
It goes way beyond this web however and I'd have to get even deeper
Forgive me I know chemistry and botany must be driving you guys mad
Believe it or not there are other hallucinogenic mushrooms in other family's that we're grouped by their main occurring chemical, whether they had scilocin or not, if the scilocin was weak enough that would not put it in it's own category of being hallucinogenic because it would match other mushrooms with the same pattern of being weaker of those chemical and stronger of others.
But at least my points have been getting laughs because I don try to make serious information humorous unlike people with sticks up their ass while they try to wrap their mind around why I have to keep repeating myself
Cannot understand still, thus repeat something I already said trying to correct my words with things I've already said, going to google and coming back, just to attack my grammar because they've found so far I'm correct and don't know what else to do
Oh well beats me


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: mysticalmagickal]
    #25867861 -

I'm misspelling due to fast typing because I'm sick of typing it. Jail me


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: mysticalmagickal]
    #25867900 -

mysticalmagickal said:
pscilocybe spcilocybin spcilocybe pscilocybin pscilocybin Scilocin, pscilocybin pscilocybin scilocin  pscilocybin pscilocybe



Now say it 5 times fast.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: Ran-D]
    #25867980 -

You're still misspelling it... scilocin and spcilocybin aren't words. Are you trying to spell it as it sounds? Again you're trying WAAAAAAY to hard. It's just becoming a waste of time communicating with you. I really got nothing else to say.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: tacodude]
    #25868029 -

Lol alright, so quote me with all my correct spelling to tell me I spell it wrong? I don't get it.
Who gives a flying fuck how two different chemicals are spelt. Those two chemicals could be named dick and jane and it wouldn't matter. You guys are making it all about words and how to spell them where as I am explaining clearly spcilocybin, and scilocin as two completely different chemicals. They are chemicals not words correct, so why do you care so much if I misspelled it a few times
Whooptie doo find something more important to quote me on and comment about maybe with insight next time


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: mysticalmagickal]
    #25868041 -

It seems to me you guys might be the ones trying way too hard to prove me wrong about common botany and chemistry
But I think you may need to try a little bit harder considering all that can be commented further on is spelling errors.
Thought we all knew here that scilocin and psylocybin are chemicals and not just words so who cares if I misspelled it, we all know what they are right and that chemicals can occur separately or together? Guess not
Bloody hell


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: mysticalmagickal]
    #25868051 -

Oh yeah now I see some that you quoted me on are misspelled and others are not. So what, the point? They are chemicals, and? Like I said I could spell it dick and jane. There's still a chemical structure behind those two words.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: mysticalmagickal]
    #25868119 -

You typed a thousand words without actually saying anything. :lol:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: Ran-D]
    #25868141 -

That's because you people have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about
I said a very large chunk of information that no one knows how to read to get the correct information out of


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: mysticalmagickal]
    #25868156 -

If you guys knew what you were reading it would make sense, for example. I have already spoken of this, and have mainly been trying to get to the point that the mushrooms you all know and love are not the only mushrooms that have hallucinogenic chemicals. I said this mushroom must be studied way further as well as the various other species. This is how various it really, really is. Making sense now?
These people are doing an in-depth study of mushrooms comsidered pointless as I did but I'm guessing that's just because they don't know what real hallucinogenic mushrooms are, and just retarded to even think to study any others that could than be put into the same category, once the chemicals in them are analyzed.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Northern California id [Re: Aly01]
    #25868413 -

This thread has been closed.

Reason:
The mushrooms in the original post have been identified. I'm locking it as the thread has been hijacked with nonsense.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* hunting in northern California's coastal Forest OpiumWeed 3,346 9 01/01/21 08:09 PM
by OsoGoloso
* Northern California (Mendocino County) mushrooms Herbus 3,310 2 10/20/04 12:38 PM
by Civ
* Northern California mokiis 2,322 4 11/19/04 10:36 PM
by tahoe
* northern california hunting expidition canid 2,829 14 11/19/03 08:46 PM
by canid
* Northern California vivid 4,974 17 11/20/07 06:28 PM
by wyattb
* Found in northern orgon, ID Request puggymalone 6,893 15 10/13/23 10:32 AM
by Mr Piggy
* Liberty caps in northern cali roofus 14,745 11 09/23/11 05:11 PM
by auweia
* Wild Mushroom ID Request Moon_Tea_Brewer 9,836 3 12/16/02 06:39 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, karode13, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
879 topic views. 1 members, 36 guests and 44 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 17 queries.