Gilgamesh18 said:

Rail_Gun said:

Beauty is subjective. Biracial types are pretty standard mud color skin, brown eyes, and kinky hair, etc. The white race is considered to be the most beautiful race however, by all races btw. And the diversity within the white race is a beautiful thing. We have brown, black, blonde, red hair, different eye colors. Mixed race are all the same looking. Their white heritage is erased forever.

---

QFT whats even more disturbing is how viciously racemixing is pushed by the media in america almost like they want whites to be eliminated

---

And we know well it's the Zionists who the media. But they themselves only marry and breed within their own race... They push an agenda but exclude themselves from it.

akumushi said:

Race is a social construct, not a biological one.  Pretty much all the black people in America who aren't fresh off the boat Africans already have at least a small percentage of white blood in them, because even in the days of slavery there was plenty of intermixing of the bloodlines.  If you have any ancestors that were slave owners, chances are you have some black cousins.  Racism is just tribalism which is a primitive caveman instinct.  Evolve.

---

A black is just a white person with a suntan and wooly hair.

 

Rail_Gun said:

Beauty is subjective.  Biracial types are pretty standard mud color skin, brown eyes, and kinky hair, etc. The white race is considered to be the most beautiful race however, by all races btw. And the diversity within the white race is a beautiful thing. We have brown, black, blonde, red hair, different eye colors. Mixed race are all the same looking. Their white heritage is erased forever.

---

Rail_Gun said:

If a white woman had a black baby she is more genetically related to a member of her own race than to her baby. She has damaged her genetic offspring and diminished the gene pool. Should miscegenation laws be reinstated since we now have genetic knowledge of the consequences? Discuss.

---

Mr Person said:

Wow I generally like your posts but this is one of the stupidest things I've ever read.  Not all biracial people are part black or brown.  And actually you are wrong that white people are considered the most beautiful race.  Scientific studies have proven that people of all races prefer biracial faces.  Beauty is not as subjective as you think.  It's an outward indicator of genetic fitness, and your argument doesn't have a leg to stand on

---

Quote:

Selection and Culling
    When man makes a plant or animal hybrid, he carefully selects which offspring he will let survive and reproduce. Nature, too, selects ruthlessly and destroys thousands of crosses from different populations, leaving few, if any, hybrid survivors. (Patterson, 1999, p. 95). When the Caucasians arose, for example, there was no government aid to the less capable, and those who did not possess the most advantageous traits of both the Cro-Magnons and the Neanderthals simply died without issue. The very existence of the Caucasians in Europe proves that they, the hybrids, were more fit in Europe than either the Cro-Magnons or the Neanderthals who begot them.
    With miscegenation today, however, few of the hybrids fail to survive and reproduce because food, shelter, medical and dental treatment, and social services are provided for them, whether or not they are sufficiently productive to pay for them. Instead of letting natural selection take its course, as it did when the Caucasian hybrids were born, the state requires the more fit to reduce their own chances of surviving and reproducing in order to enhance the chances of the less fit surviving and reproducing. Any farmer with an ounce of sense knows that all his plants and livestock are not all genetically equal, and so he selects his seed for his next year’s crop from only the best of his plants and animals; only egalitarians tell every seed that with a little manure it can be the equal of any other seed, however unfit it is.
    In primitive populations that are barely surviving, genetically-defective individuals are quickly culled, but in First World countries, with surplus resources, modern medicine, and welfare, even individuals in whom severe DRAs are expressed, are kept alive and frequently reproduce, 18 gradually degrading the gene pool. Indeed, the less capable have more reproductive success than the more capable, another byproduct of egalitarianism. With domesticated plants and animals, humans purge individuals with the slightest fault, but with their own species, only the worst cases don’t breed, so the undesirable traits of DRAs are expressed at an ever increasing percentage. And, when there are no more resources to keep the unproductive alive they will attack the more productive, killing off the foolish geese that enabled them to do so.
    When the races interbreed, there is no plan to produce a human who is more fit or even one who is healthier, more intelligent, or otherwise more desirable, other than, perhaps, being “not white.” There is not even a plan to let the offspring fend for themselves and die off if they cannot do so. All the offspring are permitted to breed and no one is stopped from breeding. Worse, the non-productive are more fecund and, still worse, new deleterious mutations arise in each generation. The inevitable result is the enfeeblement of the entire species, a fate that awaits no species save man.
    Failing to cull is like trying to create a new breed of dog by putting different purebreds in an enclosure and letting them promiscuously bred while caring for all the pups. 19 You would not end up with a new breed, just a bunch of mongrels, and you will have destroyed all the hundreds of years of work that were required to create the pure breeds you started with. That is why you pay a lot more for a purebred dog, cat, horse, cow, sheep, or tomato seed, and why a mongrel dog or cat at the pound is free or nearly free. 20
    People inherently understand the concepts involved in breeding and readily apply them not only to plants and animals, but even to their own reproductive choices. Parents, being more objective and experienced than their children, can often instantly tell when their child’s choice of a mate is a bad one. Young people, too, may have flings with enticing, but unsuitable mates, yet when it comes to settling down, the genetically-controlled traits in a mate that determine their mate’s traits and their children’s traits usually become more important. 21
    The only practical way (genetic engineering would be incredibly difficult) to obtain a population with a high percentage of desirable traits and a low percentage of undesirable traits, is to isolate that population from other populations so that it becomes inbred, then select for breeding only those individuals who have the desirable traits. That is, in fact, what our ancestors have done for us and that is what we are thoughtlessly undoing by miscegenation.

---

Gilgamesh18 said:

---

G-Cotty said:

Rail_Gun said:

If a white woman had a black baby she is more genetically related to a member of her own race than to her baby. She has damaged her genetic offspring and diminished the gene pool. Should miscegenation laws be reinstated since we now have genetic knowledge of the consequences? Discuss.

---

To my current knowledge, there is not really a negative side to mixing races. I feel like we would be seeing more obvious consequences of it today if it were a real issue. I don't really understand why anyone cares about the 'purity' of the gene pool. We are all human beings for fuck's sake... isn't that enough?

Just let natural selection do its job... man is more likely to screw things up if he tries manipulating who breeds with who IMO.

---

Rail_Gun said:

G-Cotty said:

Rail_Gun said:

If a white woman had a black baby she is more genetically related to a member of her own race than to her baby. She has damaged her genetic offspring and diminished the gene pool. Should miscegenation laws be reinstated since we now have genetic knowledge of the consequences? Discuss.

---

To my current knowledge, there is not really a negative side to mixing races. I feel like we would be seeing more obvious consequences of it today if it were a real issue. I don't really understand why anyone cares about the 'purity' of the gene pool. We are all human beings for fuck's sake... isn't that enough?

Just let natural selection do its job... man is more likely to screw things up if he tries manipulating who breeds with who IMO.

---

Natural selection does not play a role in modern society as no mass culling takes place. Animal husbandry is now the only determinant and indiscriminant breeding diminishes the species.

---