Home | Community | Message Board

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: Rocker232]
    #12392962 -

the original post is my reason for believing i am morally correct, did you even read it?

and also:
Rocker232 said:
AntiEverything said:
According to you we shouldn't put your own beliefs over the beliefs of someone elses, it is morally incorrect.

Well my moral compass tells me that it IS correct, and since you don't believe in favoring your own opinion over someone elses, then my moral values must be just as valid as yours, no?

logic is circular btw. fail at not realizing this places you in a sticky double bind where I'm always just as right as you.



Explain to me how you are sure of your position. If you have proof of your point of view then you would obviously be in the morally correct position? Currently you're at this point

I don't know shit and you don't know shit, but my lack of knowledge is less than your own so I must be naturally right.

It doesn't work man and the point I'm trying to make is that defending either side is futile.

I will agree with one part of your post though; life should be about reaping as much enjoyment out of the world as possible, but I do not however think that is something specific to athiests.

If you are a true athiest than you should let nature take over. Those who deserve to do well will and those who pray for a false heaven won't. Let evolution take the reigns :thumbup:

I myself don't know shit and I do not think there is a real way to change that. Reading the Bible isn't going to make me blieve in God nor is reading Richard Dawkins going to make me an athiest. Let people think what they want unless its having an impact on your own life. If you live in the South then I feel for you, but I don't have any problems with Christans in day to day life.



what are you talking about? that isn't what i'm saying at all. Either you aren't reading what im writing or You simply do not understand my point, read over it a few more times to try and understand.

You say that I must explain my position and basis for my moral position, yet I have extrapolated on it repeatedly, and you give a one liner:
"the point I'm trying to make is that defending either side is futile. "
and go on to not give ONE SINGLE point in favor of this argument. You don't give an explanation about why arguing either side is futile, you just say "my moral compass says that you shouldnt put your own opinion over someone elses because arguing is futile"

my position is that argumentation is NOT futile, it IS right to persuade people (read the OP), and my final point is you don't extend your argument enough to even have position to fight against in the first place, you list no reasons why it's futile, you have no big picture, no impact.


--------------------
You are at once
both
the quiet
and
the confusion
of my heart.
-Franz Kafka

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: Rocker232]
    #12392973 -

"I don't know shit and you don't know shit, but my lack of knowledge is less than your own so I must be naturally right."


you claim this is my position, and go on in your post to concede that it is your own....are you high on drugs or something? nothing you have said makes any logical sense. its all backwards.

and furthermore, if you claim to not know anything about a certain subject, why the hell are you arguing about it?

because I DO know something about it, and i consider it worthy of debate.


--------------------
You are at once
both
the quiet
and
the confusion
of my heart.
-Franz Kafka

Edited by AntiEverything (04/14/10 03:33 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: AntiEverything]
    #12393013 -

you are trying to play socrates yet not asking any questions.


--------------------
You are at once
both
the quiet
and
the confusion
of my heart.
-Franz Kafka

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: AntiEverything] * 1
    #12393095 -

Hey there, I don't want to spend too much time on the interwebs here in sunny California but when I said atheism is a belief system, I meant it thus. Also, disclaimer: I had a few beers, not thinking super-straight, and not giving this the full thrust of my intellect. Just sort of vomiting thoughts into the text box.

Atheists believe that they have come to a "logical"/"rational" deduction about the nature of the universe based on "evidence." However, their reliance on this evidence is, in essence, a complete and utter "belief" in the Newtonian-Cartesian dynamic that has ruled science in recent eras.  I truly believe we only at the beginning of a shift that will be deeply challenging long-commonly-held assertions, especially due to developments in quantum physics, quantum mechanics, and quantum physicist David Bohm's own Holographic theory of the universe and of reality.

What bothers me - and here, let me give you another disclaimer. Until I discovered the psychedelic experience, I was a fervent, rabid atheist. I was a card carrying dues-paying member of American Atheists. I went out of my way to challenge "religious" beliefs at any opportunity with which I was presented.  I felt that humanity had once believed in the divine nature of all things,a nd slowly been chiseling that down, and since we had arrived in some religions at two divine beings, and at some in one divine being, then naturally the next logical step, the "progressive" step was NONE. However, I now feel that ALL is a much more apt step than NONE.

So, what bothers me is mainly the idea that atheists have (and in the political spectrum, my problem with a lot of the New York City hyper-liberals I live and work with on a daily basis) that their views on the universe are "progressive." However, I do understnad that every group, every ideology, believes itself to have its finger on the true pulse of things. That's just the nature of the beast. That's the nature of being human.

All I know is what my experience has shown me. I forget who it was - it was either Alexander Shulgin or Albert Hofmann - but someone once wrote in an essay that "belief implies effort." I find a lot of thrust to that statement. I think a lot of capital R Religious people BELIEVE with great effort in what they believe. Or little effort at all, but nonetheless - effort is there. I consider myself a pretty religious person. Not about a traffic controller in the sky, or a conscious force behind all things, but in a general pervasive meaning to the universe, the idea that consciousness IS the universe and that everything is truly alive on levels we can only begin to comprehend. My experiences, especially with DMT, have led me to feel very religious about being alive, and I now feel I simply don't have time, space, or energy in my heart for atheism which to me is an active belief in nothing. Or at least, that's what it was for me when I embraced it.


--------------------
Acid doesn't give you truths; it builds machines that push the envelope of perception. Whatever revelations came to me then have dissolved like skywriting. All I really know is that those few years saddled me with a faith in the redemptive potential of the imagination which, however flat, stale and unprofitable the world seems to me now, I cannot for the life of me shake.

-Erik Davis

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #12393140 -

Good post


--------------------
My advice is to find those things that give pleasure and do them often without too much attachment and relax and wait for the show to end.

-Icelander-

I like free markets and all. Truly I do, at least in general, but there needs to be some kind of oversight in recognition of sustainability. Life works the same way, on a bunch of sustainable systems. Why not honor what made us what we are and take some lessons? Nature FTW!

~dill705~

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #12393155 -

If converting people away from religion really does get your dick hard, questioning someone every once a while to see if they actually believe what they claim to might be permissible. However, people are going to believe whatever they want to believe, maybe their personal beliefs are what get them through the day, keep them off hard drugs, or committed to their family in hard times. I know if you tried to persuade me out of my personal beliefs I would probably tell you to fuck off. Are you fighting some kind of un-holy war? :lol:


--------------------
Check out my gallery :sun:

Do YOU have The Band's sheet music books? I am paying cash!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Morally correct to persuade people to not believe in religion? [Re: OneMoreRobot3021]
    #12393159 -

OneMoreRobot3021 said:
Hey there, I don't want to spend too much time on the interwebs here in sunny California but when I said atheism is a belief system, I meant it thus. Also, disclaimer: I had a few beers, not thinking super-straight, and not giving this the full thrust of my intellect. Just sort of vomiting thoughts into the text box.

Atheists believe that they have come to a "logical"/"rational" deduction about the nature of the universe based on "evidence." However, their reliance on this evidence is, in essence, a complete and utter "belief" in the Newtonian-Cartesian dynamic that has ruled science in recent eras.  I truly believe we only at the beginning of a shift that will be deeply challenging long-commonly-held assertions, especially due to developments in quantum physics, quantum mechanics, and quantum physicist David Bohm's own Holographic theory of the universe and of reality.

What bothers me - and here, let me give you another disclaimer. Until I discovered the psychedelic experience, I was a fervent, rabid atheist. I was a card carrying dues-paying member of American Atheists. I went out of my way to challenge "religious" beliefs at any opportunity with which I was presented.  I felt that humanity had once believed in the divine nature of all things,a nd slowly been chiseling that down, and since we had arrived in some religions at two divine beings, and at some in one divine being, then naturally the next logical step, the "progressive" step was NONE. However, I now feel that ALL is a much more apt step than NONE.

So, what bothers me is mainly the idea that atheists have (and in the political spectrum, my problem with a lot of the New York City hyper-liberals I live and work with on a daily basis) that their views on the universe are "progressive." However, I do understnad that every group, every ideology, believes itself to have its finger on the true pulse of things. That's just the nature of the beast. That's the nature of being human.

All I know is what my experience has shown me. I forget who it was - it was either Alexander Shulgin or Albert Hofmann - but someone once wrote in an essay that "belief implies effort." I find a lot of thrust to that statement. I think a lot of capital R Religious people BELIEVE with great effort in what they believe. Or little effort at all, but nonetheless - effort is there. I consider myself a pretty religious person. Not about a traffic controller in the sky, or a conscious force behind all things, but in a general pervasive meaning to the universe, the idea that consciousness IS the universe and that everything is truly alive on levels we can only begin to comprehend. My experiences, especially with DMT, have led me to feel very religious about being alive, and I now feel I simply don't have time, space, or energy in my heart for atheism which to me is an active belief in nothing. Or at least, that's what it was for me when I embraced it.



So do you consider yourself a Theist?


--------------------
You are at once
both
the quiet
and
the confusion
of my heart.
-Franz Kafka

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Going to Church stoned (athiests only)
( 1 2 3 all )
lga0302 6,353 48 07/21/20 08:24 AM
by tyrannicalrex
* religions
( 1 2 all )
fearfect 3,279 29 01/27/05 12:10 PM
by California
* I want your opinions/I'm ranting about 50cent, OEV's and religions... thenewuser 1,606 9 04/17/05 07:28 PM
by KingOftheThing
* Pharmacists refusing to give birth control to women due to morals
( 1 2 3 all )
MOTH 6,270 41 11/27/04 06:56 PM
by d33p
* Tho ONE and ONLY Religion, I am right and you are wrong! p4kSouL 626 5 11/07/05 07:03 AM
by hobbitxkillyou
* Would it be morally feasible Freeker 474 6 01/10/06 08:38 PM
by ToTheSummit
* Crazy Christians ponder: "Does 'god' believe in atheists?"
( 1 2 all )
DNKYD 1,814 20 09/12/05 03:21 PM
by astralasia
* why cant we make our own religion?? willmafingerdo 1,461 17 12/13/05 11:31 AM
by bit_slice

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
2,431 topic views. 3 members, 197 guests and 115 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.023 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 17 queries.