Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: Daishi]
    #8676894 -

Every single one of those is a correct English sentence, except for  "So?".  Every single one of them expresses a coherent point, as attested to by SlashOZ, who didn't seem to have any problem understanding them.  Can you understand this post?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #8676905 -

zappaisgod said:
Every single one of those is a correct English sentence, except for  "So?".  Every single one of them expresses a coherent point, as attested to by SlashOZ, who didn't seem to have any problem understanding them.  Can you understand this post?



Yet it still doesn't make sense. Perhaps you made up every sentence individually, and forgot about the whole paragraph thing.


--------------------
Man has to be man--by choice; he has to hold his life as a value--by choice; he has to learn to sustain it--by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues—-by choice. A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality.”-- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: Daishi]
    #8676974 -

Like I said, SlashOZ didn't seem to have any difficulty with it.  Back to grade school for you, middle school warrior.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #8676982 -

zappaisgod said:
Like I said, SlashOZ didn't seem to have any difficulty with it.  Back to grade school for you, middle school warrior.



Ah but to me it seems that the paragraph was structured poorly i.e. poor general composition. Back to post-graduate school for you, oh wait. =)


--------------------
Man has to be man--by choice; he has to hold his life as a value--by choice; he has to learn to sustain it--by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues—-by choice. A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality.”-- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: Daishi]
    #8677001 -

Daishi said:
zappaisgod said:
Like I said, SlashOZ didn't seem to have any difficulty with it.  Back to grade school for you, middle school warrior.



Ah but to me it seems that the paragraph was structured poorly i.e. poor general composition. Back to post-graduate school for you, oh wait. =)


:cool:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #8677013 -

Uh oh- smooth operator.


--------------------
Man has to be man--by choice; he has to hold his life as a value--by choice; he has to learn to sustain it--by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues—-by choice. A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality.”-- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #8677389 -

You're right, with Bear Stearns the Fed didn't put up any money...yet.  They guaranteed $29 Bn of BS's assets.  If it turns out in the end to worth less than $29 Bn, I still wouldn't know if it really costs taxpayers money, but the outcome would not be a positive for taxpayers.  Even if it just devalues the USD, it will eventually cost taxpayers money.

The same with the Fannie and Freddie deal.  http://uk.reuters.com/article/marketsNewsUS/idUKN2349729720080723?pageNumber=1

Even if its just the Govt. getting an equity stake in those two companies in exchange for a cash infusion, that's not an investment that Warren Buffett would do to enrich the value for Berkshire Hathaway shareholders.  If it ends up being a lose money investment, than ultimately it does cost taxpayers money.  The cost of govt. is always borne by the taxpayers.  No such thing as free money to taxpayers or USD holders, even if the Fed has the power to print all it wants.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: GnosticWarrior]
    #8677411 -

But, all that said and done, it remains to be seen if a single nickel will come from the public tit.  I fervently hope not.  And I do not favor any loser home(not)owner bailout either.  They SHOULD lose title to their houses.  They didn't pay for them.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
The American economy... [Re: zappaisgod]
    #8677500 -

Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.  Rewarding bad/risky behavior by corporations...


--------------------
A mind is a terrible thing to taste...hehehe.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #8680168 -

Can I take out a loan....say for a business....then default and the Feds will bail me out?  (just in case I need it....)


Please point me in the right direction.


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bailouts a form of Socialism? [Re: GnosticWarrior]
    #8680841 -

GnosticWarrior said:
But Fannie and Freddie are not banks.  According to Wikipedia-

The govt. was not getting a piece of the profits during the good times that the shareholder were, so they  should have to eat the loss too.



the government shouldnt be bailing out mortgage lenders anyway,
they have a responsibility to their shareholders to provide
minimal risk loans with properties as collateral against the
loans, default on the loan and the finance company owns it,
when mortgage lenders have accepted tons of government
(taxpayer) cash to prevent them going under they still own these
properties, now when the economy starts to improve where are the
properties? still in the ownership of the lenders and no
repayment to the money they've taken

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Social Engineering by Democrats Destroys the World's Financial Markets
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Phred 8,371 97 10/17/08 03:18 AM
by riceandpeas
* bailout
( 1 2 3 all )
phi1618 3,528 45 09/24/08 10:35 PM
by pinkfloydms
* Another Bailout pinkfloydms 923 12 11/24/08 09:57 AM
by Prisoner#1
* With AIG's lavish spending on the bailout money, should there be more oversight to these bailouts? eatyualive 618 2 11/22/08 10:12 PM
by Prisoner#1
* Mortgage Crisis was Caused by Liberal Policies
( 1 2 3 all )
Conservationist 3,476 40 09/29/08 09:06 AM
by gettinjiggywithit
* Auto Industry Bailout
( 1 2 all )
Mr.Al 2,163 30 12/31/08 09:12 PM
by ScavengerType
* Congress, already Passed a $300 BILLION Homeowner Bailout package lonestar2004 332 0 09/23/08 04:57 PM
by lonestar2004
* Auto Bailout in US. What is this supposed to accomplish?
( 1 2 3 all )
johnm214 5,020 55 02/06/09 01:47 PM
by Bobzimmer

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
3,113 topic views. 0 members, 24 guests and 34 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.023 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 15 queries.