Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

The Spore Depot
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

MagicBag.co Shop: Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant
    #788244 -

As long as we have shroom ratings i dont think they should be permenant.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: ShroomyMcPot]
    #788259 -

People change, and so do opinions. As long as we have a rating system, you should allow us to re-rate users: "You have rated this user a 1. Would you like to change your rating?"

There have been many times that I wanted to change my rating of other people, it should be dynamic.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: TheShroomHermit]
    #788349 -

I gotta concur.


--------------------
"America: Fuck yeah!" -- Alexthegreat

“Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”  -- Thomas Jefferson

The greatest sin of mankind is ignorance.

The press takes [Trump] literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally. --Salena Zeto (9/23/16)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: ShroomyMcPot]
    #788379 -

Post deleted by administrator.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: TheShroomHermit]
    #789059 -

> People change, and so do opinions.

I concur, the rating should allow for change. It's kind of hard being locked into one rating, when the person may have changed, or you may have misunderstood the person when you first rated them.

You could modify the php code on that page to always display a little ratings "form" with a selection menu and a submit button; make "selected" the current ratings value in the selection pulldown menu; and always allow an update post to the db from that page.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Post deleted by Administrator [Re: Papaver]
    #789667 -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: ]
    #790244 -

Yes yes, do this please!


--------------------
Namaste.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: RebelSteve33]
    #790594 -

If this is possible I think it would be great.


--------------------

"Little racoons and old possums 'n' stuff all live up in here. They've got to have a little place to sit." Bob Ross.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: sir tripsalot]
    #790806 -

It should be an easy mod (1/2 hour), but then I don't know what all's under the hood. Some of those new smog-emission systems can be a bitch...

PS: It just occurred to me that some of those kind of mods can be a bitch with off the rack stuff, because whenever you upgrade, you need to keep track of all the custom mods you did, and then re-code them into the new upgraded software...


--------------------

Edited by papaver (08/01/02 01:22 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: ShroomyMcPot]
    #791230 -

- Post History Deleted Upon User's Request -

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: ShroomyMcPot]
    #791632 -

Plese, go to http://community.infopop.net/2/OpenTopic?a=cfrm&s=729094322&f=8233088913 and look in the forums if something like this is planned in the newer versions of the UBB software.
If not, you can request it.
If many people request it, the chance that it will be implemented in the newer versions might be higher.


--------------------
Grow Mushrooms from Spores - PF-Tek for Simple Minds

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Shroom ratings shouldnt be permenant [Re: ShroomyMcPot]
    #793541 -

I like that idea. Because there have been many times when I have given someone one rating and then thought later on that I could have given them some thing diffrent.


--------------------
Rock on! .

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

MagicBag.co Shop: Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* shroom ratings
( 1 2 all )		 soochi 2,823 24 04/24/03 03:33 PM
by OctopusDr
* shroom ratings soochi 1,365 4 03/14/03 12:39 PM
by The FUnGal FiEnD
* Shroom Ratings thelox 992 3 03/10/03 01:50 PM
by pillsbury420
* Bulletin Board Upgrade 3DSHROOM 1,971 17 06/19/03 11:50 PM
by matts
* Idea: A new rating system
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 Murex 9,616 62 06/01/03 07:08 PM
by blaze2
* User ratings
( 1 2 all )		 Jellric 3,782 27 07/27/02 09:49 AM
by Sclorch
* thread ratings - waste of space? shirley knott 1,266 5 02/19/03 12:46 AM
by Asante
* Q about rating MeneerCactus 1,068 4 12/11/02 10:51 AM
by MeneerCactus

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Ythan, Thor, Seuss, geokills
2,459 topic views. 0 members, 28 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 16 queries.