Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Original Sensible Seeds Shop: Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds, Feminized Cannabis Seeds, High THC Strains

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Tob be Pedro or not to be Pedro...That is the ques
    #705970 -

I have a problem....I bought what is supposed to be a San Pedro (T. Pachanoi). The label says San Pedro for the common name but for it's species it says
T. Spachianus. Obvioulsy they can't both be right. Every picture I have looked at of San Pedros and the Spachianus leads me to believe that I do indeed have a Pedro. The Spachianus have long spines while the Pedros have almost no spines on their areole. (My cactus has no spines like the Pedro) Am ijust wishful thinking or do I have a Pedro. How can I be sure of what I have. If I do have a Spachianus can I still "Go Travelling" with it? Thanks for any and all help. Chemkid


--------------------
An open mind is the greatest journey of all.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Tob be Pedro or not to be Pedro...That is the ques [Re: chemkid]
    #706258 -

Cacti are often mislabeled...especially at places like Home Depot.

My adfice would be to look at lots of pics, and if you beliegve it's San Pedro...it probably is.

If it's not, I'll send you a few San Pedro seeds myself.


-psyconaut


--------------------
It may look like a button mushroom right now, but wait until you see how it grows!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Tob be Pedro or not to be Pedro...That is the ques [Re: psyconaut]
    #706321 -

Thanks for the advice. My gut instinct is that it is a Pedro. I have looked at tons of pics. and it all seems right. Just wanted some affirmation. By the way....any favorite recipes to consume it??

Chemkid


--------------------
An open mind is the greatest journey of all.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Tob be Pedro or not to be Pedro...That is the ques [Re: chemkid]
    #706351 -

thas a good question,, I tried raw, and boiled to a shot,, both were horrible.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Tob be Pedro or not to be Pedro...That is the ques [Re: nugsarenice]
    #706455 -

I can teach you both rough and refined extractions if you're prepared to listen. P.M. me.

-psyconaut


--------------------
It may look like a button mushroom right now, but wait until you see how it grows!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Original Sensible Seeds Shop: Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds, Feminized Cannabis Seeds, High THC Strains


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* In urgent need of Pedro recipes chemkid 1,299 12 07/05/02 11:32 PM
by salviapsilo
* Pedro flowering superpimp 1,526 10 06/27/02 05:49 PM
by psyconaut
* Forcing pedro pups chemkid 4,320 16 07/09/02 01:01 PM
by chemkid
* pedro / shroom crossbreed....what is this (PIC) chemkid 1,995 13 04/29/03 12:42 PM
by greenhaze
* San Pedro and Peruvian Torch?????????????// malibu76 4,832 7 12/09/08 06:29 AM
by Dr. uarewotueat
* san pedro/Seattle Growth LCid 1,576 7 07/09/02 01:25 PM
by LCid
* Sommething groing out of my San Pedro! (PIC'S) paddo 1,217 5 08/12/02 06:21 PM
by superpimp
* Post deleted by users_request malibu76 1,051 6 07/12/02 02:13 PM
by LCid

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: karode13, Mostly_Harmless, A.k.a
972 topic views. 0 members, 18 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.023 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.