|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 8 days
|
Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Politicals Parties
#4863033 - 10/28/05 10:12 AM (18 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
This was in the last issue of Foreign Policy. Much of it rings true and is agreeable with the trend of individual candidates being stressed more than the party that supports them.
Quote:
By Fernando Henrique Cardoso
We take it for granted that political parties are vital to modern political life. They have shaped representative democracies since the late 19th century. Yet, their prospects are not bright in today?s large democracies. In fact, these powerful political machines may soon disappear.
The ground is already shifting underneath their feet. Political parties have based their platforms on ideological and class divides that are becoming less important, especially in more advanced societies. Although class consciousness still matters, ethnic, religious, and sexual identities now trump class, and these affiliations cut across traditional political party lines. Today, the labels left and right have less and less meaning. Citizens have developed multiple interests, diverse senses of belonging, and overlapping identities. Some political parties have managed to adapt. Think of the British Labour Party, under Prime Minister Tony Blair, or Brazil?s Workers? Party, whose economic policy has very little to do with its trade union origins.
Others won?t be so lucky. Political dislocation exists alongside a growing fatigue with traditional forms of political representation. People no longer trust the political establishment. They want a greater say in public matters and usually prefer to voice their interests directly or through interest groups and nongovernmental organizations. The debate on genetically modified food in Europe, for example, can hardly be understood without reference to organizations allegedly representing consumer interests, such as Greenpeace. And thanks to modern communication, citizens? groups can bypass political parties in shaping public policy. Political parties no longer have a lock on legitimacy.
Voting, of course, remains essential. But voting doesn?t require political parties, either. Indeed, the more important the issue, the more likely governments in places as different as Switzerland, Bolivia, and California will seek legitimacy directly in referenda rather than through parliaments or legislatures, the traditional stomping grounds of parties. The rejection of the European constitution in France and the Netherlands demonstrates that major political parties?all of which supported the constitution?often have little leverage once an issue is posed to the people.
In this environment, political parties are at a critical junction: They must transform themselves or become irrelevant. To survive, they must design flexible agendas not dependent on traditional class and ideological divides. Somehow, they?ll have to recapture the public imagination. And they?ll have to accept that others deserve a seat at the political table. Otherwise, the party may be over.
Fernando Henrique Cardoso was president of Brazil from 1995 to 2003.
|
kotik
fuckingsuperhero
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Politicals Parties [Re: Redstorm]
#4863376 - 10/28/05 12:29 PM (18 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
good article, thanks
Quote:
Although class consciousness still matters, ethnic, religious, and sexual identities now trump class, and these affiliations cut across traditional political party lines. Today, the labels left and right have less and less meaning.
i would have to disagree, on both counts. not only does class still trump personal freedoms / lifestyles... but left and right have had the same meaning for quite a while.. and it has always been diluted when you speak of the rich right vs the left poor, because its the same to the poor as rich left. class again trumping political affiliation.
Quote:
People no longer trust the political establishment. They want a greater say in public matters and usually prefer to voice their interests directly or through interest groups and nongovernmental organizations.
again, i have to disagree and say that there never was an overwhelming amount of trust in politics between the classes.
for me, it all comes back to class being the primary issue, because without class there is less tension, and without all this tension people tend to be more leniant / accepting.
-------------------- No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.
|
|