Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
change in certain part of policy
    #447807 -

i think that a change is in order in the part of the supplier policy that states that it is forbidden to request research chems in the forums. why? they are just as legal as spores, yet spores are permitted, and research chems aren't? this makes no sense. it is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain research chems, and not all of us have the money to go out and drop 400 for some 2c-t-7, or foxy, or 5-meo-dmt, etc.. i would ask of you moderators/amdministrators to please consider changing this part of the policy.
thank you

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #448317 -

Why do you think its your God-given right to find 5-meo-dmt through the Shroomery? Why don't you go and open 5-meo-dmtery.org and solve the problem yourself.


Heh, that was fun. Can I be a mod?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #448792 -

The admin refuses to listen to you or anyone on this subject .
It is unfortunate. As a result, more harm than good will come out of the
"research chem policy".

All you can do is append the thread below with one more, "research chem policy is stupid:


--------------------
***The Real Shroomery nigger

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: djfrog]
    #449036 -

whats with the bullshit attititude towards my simple request to mods and admins. djfrog? do you get off on being a dick to people on an internet message board?
you've done nothing besides piss me off.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: PGF]
    #449041 -

pgf:
i posted here because the mod. of the other drugs forum stated in his post to start a thread here if you had any comment/concers/problems with the whole policy. what is this board now, a dictatorship?j we cant even make requests without them falling upon the deaf ears of admins. and mods? this is bullshit!!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #449076 -

A statement was made by the mods some time ago that they are not listenening to any more input on the supplier policy.........and that all our discussion on it was a waste of time

But, I don't feel comforatable dragging it out without Thor here to defend himself...........maybe when he gets back you'll get some feedback on your comment.


--------------------
***The Real Shroomery nigger

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: PGF]
    #449110 -

A statement was made by the mods some time ago that they are not listenening to any more input on the supplier policy.........and that all our discussion on it was a waste of time

We are always open for discussion, that doesn't always mean we will do what was suggested but we will listen to it.

djfrog pretty much said what I was thinking.


--------------------
Your friendly neighborhood loon

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: 3DSHROOM]
    #449113 -

OK, but it was saidd that no amount of discussion would ever change a thing......


--------------------
***The Real Shroomery nigger

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #449172 -

"what is this board now, a dictatorship?"

What the fuck has it always been? A dictatorship.

Admins have always been and still are open to suggestion, but that doesn't mean they have to listen to you.

If you own a website, you get to run it how you want. Very simple.

You're just pissy cause you're not getting your way.


--------------------
-
Captain Jack has been hailed as a brilliant scholar, discredited as a brilliant fraud, and mistaken for a much taller man on several occasions.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: Captain Jack]
    #449465 -

no, i was pissy because someone said that this topic was closed for discussion, which is just completely wrong. i know that i probably wont get my way with this thing (though i dont see why), and thats fine. im not pissy because i cant get my way, im pissy because i cant have my say in the matter. thats all. now why has this post turned into such a clash of attitudes? its fine to have your opinion about things, but people dont have to be bitchy about it. if you feel the need to take your agression out through the net......

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #449559 -

The pro-policy people are incapable of intelligent debate on the matter.
They've proved it time and time again. Unfortunately, they are now in charge and
so we are stuck. Sucks.


--------------------
***The Real Shroomery nigger

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #449597 -

If we keep the topic open, how long before you shut up? Never? Okay, I'm alright with the topic closed then.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: ellisd]
    #449612 -

"but people dont have to be bitchy about it. "

"whats with the bullshit attititude towards my simple request to mods and admins. djfrog? do you get off on being a dick to people on an internet message board? "

I see these statements as being in conflict with each other. Namely:
Pot, kettle, black.

PGF, I really don't give a fuck about the policy either way.... but you take it way too seriously.

Toodles.


--------------------
-
Captain Jack has been hailed as a brilliant scholar, discredited as a brilliant fraud, and mistaken for a much taller man on several occasions.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: Captain Jack]
    #450037 -

CJ, I take nothing too seriously here.....
maybe you should lighten up.


--------------------
***The Real Shroomery nigger

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: change in certain part of policy [Re: PGF]
    #450494 -

"CJ, I take nothing too seriously here..... "

Well, perhaps I should amend my statement to say something like "it seems like you take things seriously", becuase it does. But I'm not really in position to actually judge.

"maybe you should lighten up. "

About the chem policy? It really doesn't matter to me, so I don't need to lighten up.... About life in general? I'd say yes, but I'd also say that for everybody.


--------------------
-
Captain Jack has been hailed as a brilliant scholar, discredited as a brilliant fraud, and mistaken for a much taller man on several occasions.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Feedback and Administration > Website Announcements and Feature Feedback
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Age Limit & General Policy Reminder AdministratorA 2,282 6 05/08/03 04:00 AM
by blaze2
* Possible new Pub policy? THE KRAT BARON 3,046 19 08/08/06 04:58 AM
by The_Red_Crayon
* IRC policies.. request for a link to the policies djfrog 2,656 6 12/28/04 03:52 PM
by motaman
* Administrative Rules & Guidelines (updated 2/22/15)
( 1 2 3 all )		 geokillsA 76,676 48 12/07/24 07:24 PM
by eric_the_red
* research chemical policy: hypocritic and elitist kapowsin 3,771 10 04/02/02 09:05 AM
by SouthernGent
* The Chemical Research Policy is stupid pants 3,613 17 11/05/01 04:00 PM
by ellisd
* shroomery content and CI Host's policies Anonymous 4,930 11 01/19/03 01:38 AM
by deprave
* Policy schmolicy loathe 1,781 7 11/25/01 01:40 PM
by loathe

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Ythan, Thor, Seuss, geokills
2,494 topic views. 0 members, 68 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.