Home | Community | Message Board

NorthSpore.com BOOMR Bag!
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
OfflineAncalagon
AgnosticLibertarian

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 15 years, 1 month
In Defense of Referencing Hitler
    #4328532 - 06/23/05 12:37 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Not a political article per say but pretty important in my opinion -- feel free to move if it if you deem that neccesary.

In Defense of Referencing Hitler
by B.K. Marcus

Suppose you were to make the claim that the correct policy will always be whatever the majority decides. And suppose I were to respond by pointing out that the "Jim Crow" racial segregation laws were the will of the majority at the time they were in effect.

Would you think I was calling you a racist? Or would you understand that I assume the opposite and am therefore using a repugnant extreme to test the limits of your position?

Now suppose instead of referencing Jim Crow, I used Adolf Hitler, who was after all elected in a political democracy and remained popular for some time. Would you think I was calling you a Nazi? Would you accuse me of equating Election Night with the Holocaust?

Well, maybe you wouldn't, but there are plenty who would. The moment the words Hitler, Holocaust, or Nazi come up, the assumption is that the speaker has left the bounds of good taste and rationality and slipped into the realm of hyperbole and name-calling.

In Internet culture, there is even a name for this phenomenon: Godwin's Law, which states, "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is also the tradition online that once such a comparison is made the discussion is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress.

The tradition is not limited to the Internet. In the fall of 2003, the following exchange took place on the public radio interview program, Fresh Air:

    Grover Norquist: "[S]ome who play at the politics of hate and envy and class division will say, 'Yes, well, that's only 2 percent,' ... [but] that's the morality of the Holocaust. 'Well, it's only a small percentage,' you know. 'I mean, it's not you, it's somebody else.'"

    Terry Gross: "Excuse me. Excuse me one second. Did you just compare the Estate Tax with the Holocaust?"

    Grover Norquist: "No, the morality that says it's OK to do something to a group because they're a small percentage of the population is the morality that says that the Holocaust is OK because they didn't target everybody, just a small percentage."

    Terry Gross: "So you see taxes ... the way they are now [as] terrible discrimination against the wealthy comparable to the kind of discrimination of, say, the Holocaust?"


After that show, I stopped listening to Fresh Air. I used to love Terry Gross, and I'd never heard of Grover Norquist before that interview, but no matter how you feel about the morality of progressive taxation ? or of taxation in general ? it should be obvious to any thinking person that Norquist was challenging the stated moral logic of a position. He was claiming an underlying principle that an action's ethical status isn't determined by the number of people it affects. But Gross was reading his challenge as a comparison of policies ? equating the Estate Tax with the Holocaust.

Search Google on the terms Norquist and Holocaust and you'll find plenty of people who share Terry Gross's interpretation of that exchange. (One of them even posted to the Mises Blog in reaction to a Lew Rockwell post.)

At the time, I wrote an angry rant about the Norquist interview, to which one reader replied, "Well, yes, but the speaker may reasonably be expected to have used the example he did because of the emotional effect of linking these two particular concepts."

Is this an objection? If so, what does it mean? Is the claim that referencing Hitler is illegitimate in principle, or that from a pragmatic point of view, it's bad strategy?

The only reason I can see for calling it illegitimate in principle is the implicit claim that all such references are examples of the Appeal To Emotion fallacy, where one abandons reason and appeals instead to visceral reflexes. But is it always fallacious to appeal to emotion? It's invalid as an argument, and it's invalid if it's expected to conclude the argument ? and perhaps this is how it's most often used ? but the appeal to emotion can also be used to confront someone with the logical consequences of their stated principles.

It is true that if you support "majority rules" as some sort of moral principle, you must also support Hitler's rise to power. If you think Hitler's power and policies were wrong no matter how many people supported them, then you can't take a principled stance in favor of majoritarianism. At best, you can only support it as a general strategy.

If you still think that democracy is a moral system, then you have to deal with the cases of Jim Crow and Adolf Hitler and decide how and why they aren't part of what you mean. If you think it would be OK to target a policy at 2% of the population that would be wrong to target at 52%, then you have to give some account of why the numbers are relevant ? and your explanation had better apply as well to the historical hard cases as it does to the present context you have in mind.


OK, you say, so maybe a reference to Hitler isn't illegitimate, but it's still a bad idea. It derails the discussion rather than moving anything forward.

Suppose we're having the majority rules debate and when I bring up the popular election of Hitler, you say, "I understand that you're making a formal comparison, but I think it's counter-productive to bring up the Nazis; there's just too much ugly emotion tied into that for me to deal with it rationally."

That certainly sounds reasonable, and perhaps if Terry Gross had said something similar to Grover Norquist I'd still be one of her listeners.

But I think even the bad-strategy argument is wrong. The whole point of referencing Hitler is to force you to test your principles in the extreme cases, and for most people, Hitler is as extreme as it gets. If we disallow reference to Hitler, it can only be an acknowledgement of the extreme position he holds in our moral imagination. But by banishing the extremes from rational discourse, we make it too easy to settle our beliefs with the comfortable cases, never having to follow positions through to their logical conclusions.

The attempt to apply logic to a disagreement is always based on formal parallels. Their purpose is to separate the underlying principle from the distractions of particular circumstance. Sometimes this involves finding less emotional examples, and sometimes it requires more emotional ones.

Sometimes they're good parallels ("So if you were the breadwinner, then it would be OK for me to do all the housework?"). Sometimes they're bad parallels ("If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you jump off a cliff?"). And sometimes they're absurd parallels ("Hitler was a vegetarian, you know! You wanna be like Hitler?"). People who can't tell the difference have no business taking offense at what they don't understand.

Think of a reference to Jim Crow, Hitler, Stalinism, Pol Pot ? whoever or whatever is your most effective symbol of political evil ? as a rhetorical shortcut to the reductio ad absurdum. The question is this: are you willing to stand by your logic when I apply it in the extreme? That is absolutely not an unfair question. If the history of the 20th century teaches us anything, it's that these extreme cases are relevant. They do happen. And they not only can be part of a rational conversation about political principles, I would argue that they should be.


--------------------
?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinelonestar2004
Live to party,work to affordit.
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 8,978
Loc: South Texas
Last seen: 13 years, 1 day
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Ancalagon]
    #4328588 - 06/23/05 12:50 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Saddam Hussein was legitimately comparable to Hitler, but I haven't heard anyone make that comparison.


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Ancalagon]
    #4328661 - 06/23/05 01:11 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

What about all the good things Hitler did?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleRavus
Not an EggshellWalker
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/18/03
Posts: 7,991
Loc: Cave of the Patriarchs
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4328797 - 06/23/05 02:01 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Hitler = Satan!

That's what people want us to think anyway. Their emotional opinions over him cloud any logical discussion over Nazi Germany.


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Ravus]
    #4328817 - 06/23/05 02:06 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Ravus said:
Hitler = Satan!

That's what people want us to think anyway. Their emotional opinions over him cloud any logical discussion over Nazi Germany.



Oh sure, just blame Satan for everything, huh? I see we can have no ration discussion of the dark one.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleRavus
Not an EggshellWalker
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/18/03
Posts: 7,991
Loc: Cave of the Patriarchs
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4328821 - 06/23/05 02:07 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

:strokebeard:

Satan did free us from the Garden of Eden. He's much more a hero than the lazy conformist God ever was.


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Ravus]
    #4328881 - 06/23/05 02:29 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Give me the Satan crowd any day.



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineJesusChrist
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4329487 - 06/23/05 05:33 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Bunch of drug crazzed hippies following Satan. Just wait until I return to take back what is rightly mine.


--------------------
Tastes just like chicken

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: JesusChrist]
    #4329756 - 06/23/05 06:37 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Soon my son, soon.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLSDempire
LibertarianEnforcer
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/23/05
Posts: 581
Last seen: 18 years, 3 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4334634 - 06/25/05 12:14 AM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
What about all the good things Hitler did?




Name one.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: LSDempire]
    #4334942 - 06/25/05 02:15 AM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

LSDempire said:
Quote:

Paradigm said:
What about all the good things Hitler did?




Name one.



Bringing Germany out of the Depression.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4335756 - 06/25/05 11:55 AM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Wasn't that about the same time the rest of the world came out of the Depression? Or did he fix the rest of the world as well?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4337015 - 06/25/05 06:56 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

zappaisgod said:
Wasn't that about the same time the rest of the world came out of the Depression? Or did he fix the rest of the world as well?



No, actually it was much earlier than the rest of the world. The US was still deep in the Depression when it entered WWII. Meanwhile, Germany had built the Autobahn, returned to a stable currency, and had the most powerful war machine the world had ever seen.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinefaslimy
Dead Man
 User Gallery
Registered: 04/04/04
Posts: 3,436
Last seen: 8 years, 3 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4337073 - 06/25/05 07:24 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Yeah and do you know where all the money came from?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: faslimy]
    #4337156 - 06/25/05 07:50 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Yup.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLSDempire
LibertarianEnforcer
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/23/05
Posts: 581
Last seen: 18 years, 3 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Silversoul]
    #4337399 - 06/25/05 08:57 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Yup.




If what he did was good, why don't you tell us where the money came from.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLSDempire
LibertarianEnforcer
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/23/05
Posts: 581
Last seen: 18 years, 3 months
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: LSDempire]
    #4337407 - 06/25/05 09:00 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Starting world war 2 was the least of Hitler's crimes, he had millions of people tortured, robbed and murdered.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblevampirism
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 8,120
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: LSDempire]
    #4337416 - 06/25/05 09:03 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

yeah, true. but it should be noted it wasnt all jews- he hated slavs just as much.

The bad part about using Hitler as a comparison is that its both an extreme and still affects people alive today.

For example, comparing Bush to Hitler is a bad idea because Bush is a little twit compared to Hitler and will never become something like that, and you're also spitting in the face of people who actually had to deal with Hitler.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: LSDempire]
    #4337420 - 06/25/05 09:04 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

LSDempire said:
Starting world war 2 was the least of Hitler's crimes, he had millions of people tortured, robbed and murdered.



It's obvious by now that you're taking what was supposed to be a joke(my question about the good things Hitler did) way too seriously.  You ruined my joke, just like Hitler ruined the striped moustache look. :mad2:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblevampirism
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 8,120
Re: In Defense of Referencing Hitler [Re: Ancalagon]
    #4337423 - 06/25/05 09:06 PM (18 years, 9 months ago)

well, you  know, he DID invent the volksvagen ( did i spell it wrong ? :sad: ), which is a beautiful car design.

but as a painter, he SUCKED, his paintings were a crime against humanity. His intolerance, aaah. ok ill stop, it's obvious hitler sucked.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST
( 1 2 3 all )
lonestar2004 5,062 40 02/25/07 12:16 PM
by gluke bastid
* Iran presents: Holocaust cartoon contest
( 1 2 all )
Catalysis 6,339 24 02/13/06 07:08 AM
by seeker
* How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power (long) ekomstop 1,323 5 09/28/04 05:16 PM
by Phred
* Bush heir to Holocaust fortune... ruskifile 707 2 02/28/03 08:43 AM
by Rono
* HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR DENOUNCES ANTI-GUN-OWNERSHIP MOVEMENT MagicalMystery 1,658 14 09/07/05 10:50 AM
by MagicalMystery
* Holocaust Revisionist Theory
( 1 2 all )
Cornholio 2,256 37 07/31/03 03:30 PM
by Cornholio
* Libertarians, War & Consistent Application of Principles
( 1 2 all )
Autonomous 3,016 27 10/06/03 11:26 AM
by EchoVortex
* Pre-emptive war to its logical extreme
( 1 2 3 all )
looner2 3,541 48 04/13/05 12:48 PM
by SWEDEN

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,962 topic views. 1 members, 2 guests and 14 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.