Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
Not another "what the bleep do we know thread"
    #4238995 -

well, kind of, I just watched the movie and was awe struck by one certain part of it.
The part about intent and emotions focused on water which is then frozen. It is interesting IMO....so here is a link to some pictures and a better explanation.

water crystals

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239000 -

Frequently bullshit is facinating, but alas - there is no substance to his claims. True stuff is w-a-y more interesting.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239022 -

Emoto published his work without peer review (surprised?). This means that he can report anything at all, and since no other scientists were offered the opportunity to comment, his word goes uncontested.

The book is currently too-recently published (2004) for others to have tried to reproduce his results. I suspect that when they do, this will all turn out to be be bunk.

Even if debunked, it will of course not prevent millions from purchasing his book and consulting services. I gotta hand it to him; wish I'd thought of this first.


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.

Edited by Diploid (05/31/05 03:15 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: Diploid]
    #4239071 -

Until the groundbreaking work of a pioneer Japanese researcher whose astonishing discovery about water, documented photographically, changed most of what we didn't know?and led to a new consciousness of Earth's most precious resource.

Sounds like the calling-card of a crackpot :smirk:

You don't see most scientists hyping their work this much. The idea is to let the data speak for itself :wink:


--------------------
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: trendal]
    #4239077 -

I was interested in this movie at first, but if all the data is unsubstantiated then I guess I won't waste my time.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: trendal]
    #4239083 -

The idea is to let the data speak for itself

True, unless there is no real data.  :thumbdown:


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: MOTH]
    #4239117 -

I watched it, with high hopes, and was completely unimpressed.

Looks like it was written by someone with only the barest of knowledge in quantum theory.


--------------------
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: trendal]
    #4239142 -

As if that will stop the New Age Fluffernauts from "oohing" and "ahhing" and speaking reverently to all their friends about water and mind power.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: Swami]
    #4239182 -

but what if his tests were recreated and it was shown to be true? The whole movie is basically going down an avenue in which QP has shown to not just be metaphysical. The Young Slit experiment has proven that our mere observation of photons changes their behaviour and even existence.
I admit a lot of it was new age crap, even with the cheesy music and all, but it just put into laymans terms what the spiritual implications of Qp are having.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239193 -

The Young Slit experiment has proven that our mere observation of photons changes their behaviour and even existence.


I would say it just shows that our experiment detects photons/light in different manners depending on how we set up the experiment.

The Copenhagen interpretation is not the only interpretation of QM theory :wink:


--------------------
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: trendal]
    #4239202 -

If you would like me to, I will post the thousands of QM experiments done to try and throw a wrench into the findings of the Young Slit experiment or that try to observe without observing.
This experiment has been done in so many ways and each time with the exact same result.
They have even gone so far as to use reflective mirrors, atomic spin, and planned entanglement to try and trick the photon or sub atomic particle into thinking that it wasnt being observed.
It doesnt matter which theory of QM you adopt, the Young Slit experiment is a reliable peice of experimentation, and it has yet to be discredited at all, by anyone.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239217 -

but what if his tests were recreated and it was shown to be true?

The we can have a REAL discussion on the implications. However, as it stands, this is the same old "Secret Life of Plants" scenario from the '70s that everyone went gaga over and was shown to be hogwash.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239229 -

This experiment has been done in so many ways and each time with the exact same result.

Who said it was discredited, or in any way wrong?

Because I sure didn't :smirk:

Read my post again.


--------------------
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: Swami]
    #4239232 -

I dont think anyone is really going gaga over the frozen water thing. it was just a little mini side plot in the movie, nonetheless, it is a worthy experiment that should be taken further to see if there is any validity to it. But yes, it is crap until there is further study done on it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239277 -

nonetheless, it is a worthy experiment

No, it is not. Worthy experiments are subject to peer-review. :syringe:


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: Diploid]
    #4239317 -

i was talking about the idea of the experiment. Yes , i agree that what the asian guy did wasnt scientifically sound, but the idea of the experiment is awesome.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239323 -

so then trendal, you agree that photons change their behaviour by mere observation of them?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239325 -

If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you. Some of their claims don't seem to hold water :grin:,so...

With that out of the way, I liked some of the movie. I believe personally that the way we choose to think about things can help to shape our reality. The movie got me thinking more about this. It got me thinking about Quantum Physics also.

Too bad that they made statements of fact that weren't verifiable. If it was a SiFi movie we could have all gone on our merry way. Which I choose to do by not believing or rejecting outright everything the movie had to say. :mushroom2:


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: SneezingPenis]
    #4239332 -

so then trendal, you agree that photons change their behaviour by mere observation of them?

I agree that different setup/proceedures for experiments will cause different results :wink:

As far as I know, there is no experiment which involves direct human "observation" of photons. Probably because we can't directly observe a photon.


--------------------
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free.
But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Not another "what the bleep do we know thread" [Re: trendal]
    #4239354 -

Probably because we can't directly observe a photon.

I burnt my retinas staring into the sun on acid. Does that count?


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Does A Photon Have Awareness?
( 1 2 all )
DiploidM 3,244 28 05/04/05 06:27 PM
by cubed
* What The Bleep Do We Know.....?
( 1 2 3 all )
eMotionALLmotion 2,355 41 04/04/05 11:55 PM
by gettinjiggywithit
* "What the bleep do we know?" niteowl 913 16 03/28/05 10:02 AM
by niteowl
* ADD/ADHD/ADDHDA: LIES? Your Observations Viveka 1,199 17 12/02/02 07:13 AM
by monoamine
* Experience of the Divine Sole_Worthy 2,448 19 07/22/03 03:40 PM
by Azmodeus
* An Experience of Heightened Awareness RebelSteve33 2,263 14 07/03/02 10:42 PM
by Traveller
* What the BLEEP do we know? gratefulgere 874 14 10/10/05 07:35 AM
by The14thWarrior
* What the Bleep do we Know question_for_joo 432 4 10/23/04 11:22 PM
by Swami

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,309 topic views. 0 members, 4 guests and 41 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.033 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.