Asante said:

People could make rhymes about killing people if it were presented with more entertainment value.

Reading such a rhyme is a chore, an investment, and when you have done so there are barely returns other than the notion that “imachavel has a thing with killing”.

In my first rhyme I used Pub meta humor. In my second I relied on deliberate excessive gore. Both had a punchline.

Those are entertainment elements for the reader, your rhymes seem written for the writer, and I think few others than you read them.

You may “have more with killing” than I am comfortable with since what you do seems more driven by desire for author catharsis than with reader entertainment in mind.

Even the autosummary AI finds no redeeming qualities in the post to recommend to read it for:

Quote:

This post is a disturbing and violent narrative from an individual who claims to have killed multiple people, justifying his actions as a means to prevent earthquakes and fulfill a divine mission. He describes his killings in graphic detail, referencing mental illness, hallucinations, and a belief in reincarnation and spiritual communication. The text includes accounts of murders committed in various settings, with the author claiming to have been influenced by a perceived higher power and a desire to stop natural disasters. He also mentions interactions with law enforcement, a trial, and a prison sentence, while expressing confusion over others' lack of belief in his stated motives. The post is filled with violent imagery, religious references, and a distorted sense of purpose.[

---

It doesn’t discern whether artistic effort was taken.

---

Oh man I am sorry the ones you wrote were so much better

mine were written for the writer and not for the reader

It's a chore

And then the AI even said no artistic effort was taken

You might not even take the time to read and understand in a few lines I may rhyme one syllable in another I may rhyme five or six syllables

But look. I must have written a hundred times here what anyone else has

To be honest some of them are way too long and some of them are much shorter. Some of them the lines are uneven way too many words in one and way too few in the other. Others line up perfectly.

Look to be honest I don't even really think this thread should be in this pub. I wouldn't know where to move it to though. I feel all threads in the pub eventually end up like this.

But you're right it is becoming a chore. All right 300 lines for someone else to write three lines. By the time I've done another 300 they'll have just done another three.

It's like you go build 20 houses and someone just lays the foundation of another house and doesn't like the architectural style and design of what you've built.

Perhaps they just want to rip it down and rebuild it themselves.

I'm fine by that. I just questioned if there's going to be any rebuilding.

I would love for someone to show me how it's done. Write it up properly.

be my guest. As I said I think it's still a miracle that this thread is at least about rhymes positive or negative in its criticism or however. I mean I'll give it that. 100% it's still about the subject that started as. It hasn't turned into politics or anybody getting banned. None of it.

I could probably even take any single one of these posts simply take the rhymes and rewrite the whole thing with less words it would be a totally different story but still use the same rhymes. It would look simpler and cleaner it would be totally different but....

... I don't know why go through all that.

Like most things that happen in this pub I really don't think no matter what I would have written anyone would really try to understand and read it beyond what could be processed in the first four seconds of thinking.

Anyway just saying what I think. As everyone else does. Opinions I guess everybody has one. Much like something else

twighead said:

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE said:

Quote:

justifying his actions as a means to prevent earthquakes and fulfill a divine mission. He describes his killings in graphic detail, referencing mental illness, hallucinations, and a belief in reincarnation and spiritual communication. The text includes accounts of murders committed in various settings, with the author claiming to have been influenced by a perceived higher power and a desire to stop natural disasters. [/quote]

---

---

ok this is cooler than I thought, I'll give it a go


I prevented a 10.0 earthquake,
by burning their bodies at the stake,
who?
the billionaires!
who?
the billionaires!
I stopped dead a hurricane,
by rolling their head around all of spain
who?
king leopold the 2nd!
who?
king leopold the 2nd!
I saved the world from a great famine,
by putting a poison arrow through a bad man,
who?
a faceless cabal leader!
who?
a faceless cabal leader!

---