Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Hunting and Identification
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Bay area find .. no actives
    #25890648 -

good afternoon everyone at shroomery. i recently came across some mushrooms while on a walk and was wondering what they might be.
i was not able to get a spore print of all but i did take 1.thank you in advance.







these were found under a bush






Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bay area find .. no actives [Re: Medusafro]
    #25890879 -

Top specimen is a Hypholoma species from what I can tell, better pictures close up would be helpful showing the gills and stipe are important too.

I can't see the 2nd well enough to make an accurate identification of any kind.


--------------------


Psilocybe cubensis data collection thread. please help with this project if you hunt wild cubensis.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=26513593&page=0&vc=1#26513593

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bay area find .. no actives [Re: Medusafro]
    #25891363 -

Hi good evening, your first one is Leratiomyces riparius and the second one is the possibly undescribed Lepista that I am currently calling Lepista glaucocana, for lack of a better name.  Looks like you found it under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupressus_macrocarpa. 


See also https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY859799.2

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bay area find .. no actives [Re: Alan Rockefeller]
    #25892753 -

thank you both for the helpful information, i will make sure to take better photos next time.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Hunting and Identification
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Area = Active? Shockey 2,365 9 08/28/02 11:34 AM
by Shockey
* Is there active mushrooms in Eastern Oregon? mush20 8,096 7 08/21/04 10:47 AM
by spores
* ** NSW 2019 Actives only & Discussion Thread ** ☆NO ID REQUESTS☆
( 1 2 3 4 ... 28 29 )		 AzzA 42,951 576 02/11/20 04:44 AM
by Red_Beard
* Some kind of Lepista ? ragadinks 1,139 2 10/03/04 03:00 AM
by ragadinks
* I need an ID (thanks in advance :))
( 1 2 all )		 pharmacopeia 4,443 21 07/08/04 10:48 AM
by greenfaery
* active species Anonymous 1,307 5 10/20/02 12:21 AM
by angryshroom
* some more shrooms. r they active? Hamurabi 1,188 7 12/11/02 07:45 PM
by OJ
* Indiana/Kentucky Active Mushrooms HaZyNWonderland 47,789 13 03/11/14 09:17 PM
by Spore Collector

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, karode13, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
165 topic views. 0 members, 216 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.