Repertoire89 said:

Sbit Id strangle that dog and eat it

---

If that were my baby and my dog, I'd probably cook him and eat him too.

cannabinated said:

It's possible that they could just freak out randomly even if they're is socialized and know how to play with other dogs, but I haven't seen it.

---

Crystal G said:

Repertoire89 said:

Sbit Id strangle that dog and eat it

---

If that were my baby and my dog, I'd probably cook him and eat him too.

---

cannabinated said:

The issue is about attacking other dogs, pitbulls rarely attack humans. People go to the hospital all of the time for other breeds attacking them. And dogs have been co-existing with humans for tens of thousands of years.

---

Is that so, then why is there an organization specifically for victims of pit bull attacks?

http://www.nationalpitbullvictimawareness.org

This is the map solely of media reports on pit bull bites that resulted in human deaths.




This is what they say

Quote:

There are more than 25 media reports of pit bull attacks on people per week, and one death every 13 days.
By comparison, there are approximately 15 shark attacks on people per year in the United States, with one death every two years.
Pit bull attacks are rarely “dog bites”. Most attacks require hospitalization.
Although they represent only 4.5% of dogs in America, pit bulls killed 64.4% of 360 Americans who died as a result of a dog bite injury between 2005-2015, compared to Rottweilers at 11.4% and German Shepherds at 3.6%.

---

CookieCrumbs said:

cannabinated said:

It's possible that they could just freak out randomly even if they're is socialized and know how to play with other dogs, but I haven't seen it.

---

Same. Every single time "the dog just snapped" if there is video or I witnessed it there was warnings that the dog was uncomfortable or agitated and people ignored or were oblivious to the signs.

Again I think everyone should study dog behavior in grade school. At least so far is how to recognize, avoid or defend against an aggressive dog.



Only time I've seen or heard of a dog inexplicably snapping is when it's old and senile or has been suffering and in pain. Which isn't really inexplicable.
My great grandma got pretty senile and she beat the nurses with her walking cane for no reason.

---

vandago said:

That's not a pitbull.

---

vandago said:

I also don't believe that story in the slightest.  Sounds like the baby was left unattended with the dog, probably agitated it, and the dog attacked it.

---

A 3 day old baby agitated it? lol...

You do realize newborn babies can't move or grab things or even sit up straight, right? Babies can't even do anything except lie there and cry for like 6 months.

So exactly how could a 3 day old baby have possibly agitated a dog, I wonder?

vandago said:

Ok, so not a pitbull?  Mixed with what?  It's a mutt.

It has no details what so ever.  Most likely either a fake news story propagated by anti pit fucks, or parents trying to cover up the fact they left their child unattended.

And yes, I've been around a lot of babies.  Why was a 3 day old baby within biting distance of a dog?  Just uncomfortable and strange body language can agitate any dog.

Dogs are dogs. They have teeth. They bite.

---

Crystal G said:

CookieCrumbs said:

Well you should never have a child that young around an animal without a leash.

Again tho, that can happen with any dog. I remember when my family dog, a lab mix (he was nearly pure black lab) met a hippie for the first time. Her dreads, her bright tiedye shirt contrasting with her black fingernails freaked him all the fuck out. He growled and barked and refused to let her get through the door way.

---

My dog hates police officers, tried to almost bite one. Luckily she's only 5lbs or that story could have turned out very differently for her.

---

Crystal G said:

vandago said:

I also don't believe that story in the slightest.  Sounds like the baby was left unattended with the dog, probably agitated it, and the dog attacked it.

---

A 3 day old baby agitated it? lol...

You do realize newborn babies can't move or grab things or even sit up straight, right? Babies can't even do anything except lie there and cry for like 6 months.

So exactly how could a 3 day old baby have possibly agitated a dog, I wonder?

---

Crystal G said:

vandago said:

Ok, so not a pitbull?  Mixed with what?  It's a mutt.

It has no details what so ever.  Most likely either a fake news story propagated by anti pit fucks, or parents trying to cover up the fact they left their child unattended.

And yes, I've been around a lot of babies.  Why was a 3 day old baby within biting distance of a dog?  Just uncomfortable and strange body language can agitate any dog.

Dogs are dogs. They have teeth. They bite.

---

A Staffordshire Terrier is a pitbull. It's a pitbull mix.

You never explained exactly how a 3 day old baby agitated the dog. It's not like it was capable of grabbing its tail or anything.

---

I clearly stated just body language can agitate a dog, the picture is not a pure bred pitbull, the article gives no detail.  That was 100% the parents negligent fault. If you are irresponsible enough to have a dog within biting distance of a baby and not be able to tell the signs of an agitated animal, then you shouldnt have dogs or children.

Obviously the dog was agitated it bit the baby.

cannabinated said:

Those parents were dumb for leaving their pitbull with their 3 day old baby

---