Okay. So I'm not one for "nutter" stuff, but the more I see of things like this it really makes me wonder how long humans have been here.

The privatized testing of the hammer troubles me, but a Creationist now owns it and refuses to have it tested.

Quote:

The trials spent in Battelle Laboratory indicate  to unusual composition of the hammer, consisting of 96 % of iron, 2,6 % of chlorine and 0,74 % of sulfur (not Carboneum). Test for strength had shown, that it was casting of excellent quality, free of any beads (bubbles) and inclusions.

The unique layer of iron oxide which is not characteristic for the modern atmospheric environment, protected the hammer from rust. And notch made on the hammer in 1934 (or 1936) (with the help of rat-file) was not oxidised till now.

Rocks containing the hammer are semigrown together concretions of calcareous sandstones. Ann Cairns from the Geological Society of America cites data that in analogous rocks several miles upwards the brook  the Lower Cretaceous fossils have been found out. And the rock is a part of the Lower Cretaceous Edwards Plateau which was formed 140 million years ago when dinosaurs dominated on the Earth.

---

Quote:

The dates have been a matter of dispute but a study published in 2012 supports placing the art in the Aurignacian period, approximately 32,000–30,000 BP.

---

demiu5 said:

wanna share the name of the documentary? 

---

Nitrous Monkey said:

That looks fake as fuck

---

Dark_Star said:

Yeah that hammer has got to be a hoax. With that said, I do believe that humans have been around longer than mainstream science would have us think, and that there were sophisticated large scale civilizations prior to the end of the last ice age.

---

Magicman69 said:

Whether this is fake or not doesn't change the fact that our idea of ancient civilization is changing. It's a slow process to get the mainstream to abandon the ideas they've been teaching for so long but I suspect the evidence will be irrefutable pretty soon. In the words of Graham Hancock "Things just keep getting older."

---

shivas.wisdom said:

"to avoid conceding that it is a hoax, some conspiracy theorists have suggested that the “ancient mobile phone” was probably created by a time traveler who saw the object in modern times and returned to the past to recreate it."


airtight logic

---

Amanita86 said:

All speculation... not a single one of you can hit that dart board, bullseyed.  Put down the books and look at the sky. 

Find me one person who knows the whole story of what's going on here.  All I know for sure is, you're in it...

---