Home | Community | Message Board

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore Cultivation Supplies   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |  [ show all ]
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: setb]
    #21505678 -

setb said:
They are lifting the sanctions. That was kind of the whole point: lift the sanction in exchange for a brief slow down of their nuke development. It's a shitty deal.




Probably should've specified there a bit. Their oil sanctions are being lifted, but none of the others they have (like supporting terrorism, human rights abuses, ballistic missles, etc) are being lifted.


--------------------
"I have no way of knowing whether you, who eventually will read this record, like stories or not. If you do not, no doubt you have turned these pages without attention. I confess that I love them. Indeed, it often seems to me that of all the good things in the world, the only ones humanity can claim for itself are stories and music; the rest, mercy, beauty, sleep, clean water and hot food (as the Ascian would have said) are all the work of the Increate. Thus, stories are small things indeed in the scheme of the universe, but it is hard not to love best what is our own—hard for me, at least."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: DidYouSetItToWumbo]
    #21505684 -

DidYouSetItToWumbo said:
Webster10 said:
DidYouSetItToWumbo said:
I doubt Iran takes much of anything we do seriously after those 47 whackos in the senate proved our governing bodies lack of intelligence.



How is a veiled threat a lack of intelligence? IMO it probably scared them a little more straight then they would've been.



Because they had no right to be interfering. I don't give a fuck how shitty the deal is, the right way to point this out isn't by passing a folded note under the desk like a third grader.



Number 1 You are ignorant of the laws of the US.  President shitbag is not king.  It is the Senate's job to "interfere" and the letter was posted for the whole world, not under the desk.
Number 2 What deal?  Nobody seems to agree on what it is
Number 3 Iran should be shunned by all freedom loving people in all nations until the mullahs are extinct.  All mullahs should be extinct.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Adden]
    #21505688 -

TEMPLAR PALADIN said:
It would be terrible if a nuclear "accident" happened in Iran.

If not,







Is someone predicting a future massad opperation?


--------------------
FREE BURKE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #21505690 -

Yeah, Obama needs to go through the Senate if he wants to make this deal an official treaty.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #21505692 -

Quote:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/IranDealParameters04022015.pdf

Enrichment
• Iran has agreed to reduce by approximately two-thirds its installed centrifuges. Iran will go from having about 19,000 installed today to 6,104 installed under the deal, with only 5,060 of these enriching uranium for 10 years. All 6,104 centrifuges will be IR-1s, Iran’s first-generation centrifuge.
• Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years.
• Iran has agreed to reduce its current stockpile of about 10,000 kg of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to 300 kg of 3.67 percent LEU for 15 years.
• All excess centrifuges and enrichment infrastructure will be placed in IAEA monitored storage and will be used only as replacements for operating centrifuges and equipment.
• Iran has agreed to not build any new facilities for the purpose of enriching uranium for 15 years.
• Iran’s breakout timeline – the time that it would take for Iran to acquire enough fissile material for one weapon – is currently assessed to be 2 to 3 months. That timeline will be extended to at least one year, for a duration of at least ten years, under this framework.
Iran will convert its facility at Fordow so that it is no longer used to enrich uranium
• Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium at its Fordow facility for at least 15 years.
• Iran has agreed to convert its Fordow facility so that it is used for peaceful purposes only – into a nuclear, physics, technology, research center.
• Iran has agreed to not conduct research and development associated with uranium enrichment at Fordow for 15 years.
• Iran will not have any fissile material at Fordow for 15 years. 2
• Almost two-thirds of Fordow’s centrifuges and infrastructure will be removed. The remaining centrifuges will not enrich uranium. All centrifuges and related infrastructure will be placed under IAEA monitoring.
Iran will only enrich uranium at the Natanz facility, with only 5,060 IR-1 first-generation centrifuges for ten years.
• Iran has agreed to only enrich uranium using its first generation (IR-1 models) centrifuges at Natanz for ten years, removing its more advanced centrifuges.
• Iran will remove the 1,000 IR-2M centrifuges currently installed at Natanz and place them in IAEA monitored storage for ten years.
• Iran will not use its IR-2, IR-4, IR-5, IR-6, or IR-8 models to produce enriched uranium for at least ten years. Iran will engage in limited research and development with its advanced centrifuges, according to a schedule and parameters which have been agreed to by the P5+1.
• For ten years, enrichment and enrichment research and development will be limited to ensure a breakout timeline of at least 1 year. Beyond 10 years, Iran will abide by its enrichment and enrichment R&D plan submitted to the IAEA, and pursuant to the JCPOA, under the Additional Protocol resulting in certain limitations on enrichment capacity.
Inspections and Transparency
• The IAEA will have regular access to all of Iran’s nuclear facilities, including to Iran’s enrichment facility at Natanz and its former enrichment facility at Fordow, and including the use of the most up-to-date, modern monitoring technologies.
• Inspectors will have access to the supply chain that supports Iran’s nuclear program. The new transparency and inspections mechanisms will closely monitor materials and/or components to prevent diversion to a secret program.
• Inspectors will have access to uranium mines and continuous surveillance at uranium mills, where Iran produces yellowcake, for 25 years.
• Inspectors will have continuous surveillance of Iran’s centrifuge rotors and bellows production and storage facilities for 20 years. Iran’s centrifuge manufacturing base will be frozen and under continuous surveillance.
• All centrifuges and enrichment infrastructure removed from Fordow and Natanz will be placed under continuous monitoring by the IAEA.
• A dedicated procurement channel for Iran’s nuclear program will be established to monitor and approve, on a case by case basis, the supply, sale, or transfer to Iran of 3 certain nuclear-related and dual use materials and technology – an additional transparency measure.
• Iran has agreed to implement the Additional Protocol of the IAEA, providing the IAEA much greater access and information regarding Iran’s nuclear program, including both declared and undeclared facilities.
• Iran will be required to grant access to the IAEA to investigate suspicious sites or allegations of a covert enrichment facility, conversion facility, centrifuge production facility, or yellowcake production facility anywhere in the country.
• Iran has agreed to implement Modified Code 3.1 requiring early notification of construction of new facilities.
• Iran will implement an agreed set of measures to address the IAEA’s concerns regarding the Possible Military Dimensions (PMD) of its program.
Reactors and Reprocessing
• Iran has agreed to redesign and rebuild a heavy water research reactor in Arak, based on a design that is agreed to by the P5+1, which will not produce weapons grade plutonium, and which will support peaceful nuclear research and radioisotope production.
• The original core of the reactor, which would have enabled the production of significant quantities of weapons-grade plutonium, will be destroyed or removed from the country.
• Iran will ship all of its spent fuel from the reactor out of the country for the reactor’s lifetime.
• Iran has committed indefinitely to not conduct reprocessing or reprocessing research and development on spent nuclear fuel.
• Iran will not accumulate heavy water in excess of the needs of the modified Arak reactor, and will sell any remaining heavy water on the international market for 15 years.
• Iran will not build any additional heavy water reactors for 15 years.
Sanctions
• Iran will receive sanctions relief, if it verifiably abides by its commitments.
• U.S. and E.U. nuclear-related sanctions will be suspended after the IAEA has verified that Iran has taken all of its key nuclear-related steps. If at any time Iran fails to fulfill its commitments, these sanctions will snap back into place. 4
• The architecture of U.S. nuclear-related sanctions on Iran will be retained for much of the duration of the deal and allow for snap-back of sanctions in the event of significant non-performance.
• All past UN Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneous with the completion, by Iran, of nuclear-related actions addressing all key concerns (enrichment, Fordow, Arak, PMD, and transparency).
• However, core provisions in the UN Security Council resolutions – those that deal with transfers of sensitive technologies and activities – will be re-established by a new UN Security Council resolution that will endorse the JCPOA and urge its full implementation. It will also create the procurement channel mentioned above, which will serve as a key transparency measure. Important restrictions on conventional arms and ballistic missiles, as well as provisions that allow for related cargo inspections and asset freezes, will also be incorporated by this new resolution.
• A dispute resolution process will be specified, which enables any JCPOA participant, to seek to resolve disagreements about the performance of JCPOA commitments.
• If an issue of significant non-performance cannot be resolved through that process, then all previous UN sanctions could be re-imposed.
• U.S. sanctions on Iran for terrorism, human rights abuses, and ballistic missiles will remain in place under the deal.
Phasing
• For ten years, Iran will limit domestic enrichment capacity and research and development – ensuring a breakout timeline of at least one year. Beyond that, Iran will be bound by its longer-term enrichment and enrichment research and development plan it shared with the P5+1.
• For fifteen years, Iran will limit additional elements of its program. For instance, Iran will not build new enrichment facilities or heavy water reactors and will limit its stockpile of enriched uranium and accept enhanced transparency procedures.
• Important inspections and transparency measures will continue well beyond 15 years. Iran’s adherence to the Additional Protocol of the IAEA is permanent, including its significant access and transparency obligations. The robust inspections of Iran’s uranium supply chain will last for 25 years.
• Even after the period of the most stringent limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, Iran will remain a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits Iran’s development or acquisition of nuclear weapons and requires IAEA safeguards on its nuclear program. 5










I've also seen reports that it looks more like this (this is the one Iran claims is the legitimate one I guess? Unsure here.)
Quote:
FM Spokeswoman rejected the text of Geneva Agreement released by White House. Farsnews released a 4-page text Joint Plan of Action that was supposedly the result of the agreement reached during Geneva talks
Iranian Version
Geneva, 24 November 2013
Joint Plan of Action
Preamble
The goal for these negotiations is to reach a mutually-agreed long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure Iran's nuclear programme will be exclusively peaceful. Iran reaffirms that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek or develop any nuclear weapons. This comprehensive solution would build on these initial measures and result in a final step for a period to be agreed upon and the resolution of concerns. This comprehensive solution would enable Iran to fully enjoy its right to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes under the relevant articles of the NPT in conformity with its obligations therein. This comprehensive solution would involve a mutually defined enrichment programme with practical limits and transparency measures to ensure the peaceful nature of the programme. This comprehensive solution would constitute an integrated whole where nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. This comprehensive solution would involve a reciprocal, step-bystep process, and would produce the comprehensive lifting of all UN Security Council sanctions, as well as multilateral and national sanctions related to Iran's nuclear programme
There would be additional steps in between the initial measures and the final step, including, among other things, addressing the UN Security Council resolutions, with a view toward bringing to a satisfactory conclusion the UN Security Council's consideration of this matter. The E3+3 and Iran will be responsible for conclusion and implementation of mutual near-term measures and the comprehensive solution in good faith. A Joint Commission of E3/EU+3 and Iran will be established to monitor the implementation of the near-term measures and address issues that may arise, with the IAEA responsible for verification of nuclear-related measures. The Joint Commission will work with the IAEA to facilitate resolution of past and present issues of concern.
Elements of a first step The first step would be time-bound, with a duration of 6 months, and renewable by mutual consent, during which all parties will work to maintain a constructive atmosphere for negotiations in good faith. Iran would undertake the following voluntary measures:
• From the existing uranium enriched to 20%, retain half as working stock of 20% oxide for fabrication of fuel for the TRR. Dilute the remaining 20% UF6 to no more than 5%. No reconversion line.
• Iran announces that it will not enrich uranium over 5% for the duration of the 6 months.
• Iran announces that it will not make any further advances of its activities at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant1, Fordow2, or the Arak reactor3, designated by the IAEA as IR-40.
• Beginning when the line for conversion of UF6 enriched up to 5% to UO2 is ready, Iran has decided to convert to oxide UF6 newly enriched up to 5% during the 6 month period, as provided in the operational schedule of the conversion plant declared to the IAEA.
• No new locations for the enrichment.
• Iran will continue its safeguarded R&D practices, including its current enrichment R&D practices, which are not designed for accumulation of the enriched uranium.
• No reprocessing or construction of a facility capable of reprocessing.
• Enhanced monitoring:
o Provision of specified information to the IAEA, including information on Iran's plans for nuclear facilities, a description of each building on each nuclear site, a description of the scale of operations for each location engaged in specified nuclear activities, information on uranium mines and mills, and information on source material. This information would be provided within three months of the adoption of these measures.
o Submission of an updated DIQ for the reactor at Arak, designated by the IAEA as the IR-40, to the IAEA.
o Steps to agree with the IAEA on conclusion of the Safeguards Approach for the reactor at Arak, designated by the IAEA as the IR-40.
o Daily IAEA inspector access when inspectors are not present for the purpose of Design Information Verification, Interim Inventory Verification, Physical Inventory Verification, and unannounced inspections, for the purpose of access to offline surveillance records, at Fordow and Natanz.
o IAEA inspector managed access to:
centrifuge assembly workshops4;
centrifuge rotor production workshops and storage facilities; and, uranium mines and mills.
Footnotes:
1 Namely, during the 6 months, Iran will not feed UF6 into the centrifuges installed but not enriching uranium. Not install additional centrifuges. Iran announces that during the first 6 months, it will replace existing centrifuges with centrifuges of the same type.
2 At Fordow, no further enrichment over 5% at 4 cascades now enriching uranium, and not increase enrichment capacity. Not
feed UF6 into the other 12 cascades, which would remain in a non-operative state. No interconnections between cascades.
Iran announces that during the first 6 months, it will replace existing centrifuges with centrifuges of the same type.
3 Iran announces on concerns related to the construction of the reactor at Arak that for 6 months it will not commission the reactor or transfer fuel or heavy water to the reactor site and will not test additional fuel or produce more fuel for the reactor or install remaining components.
4 Consistent with its plans, Iran's centrifuge production during the 6 months will be dedicated to replace damaged machines.
In return, the E3/EU+3 would undertake the following voluntary measures:
• Pause efforts to further reduce Iran's crude oil sales, enabling Iran's current customers to purchase their current average amounts of crude oil. Enable the repatriation of an agreed amount of revenue held abroad. For such oil sales, suspend the EU and U.S. sanctions on associated insurance and transportation services.
• Suspend U.S. and EU sanctions on:
o Iran's petrochemical exports, as well as sanctions on associated services.5 o Gold and precious metals, as well as sanctions on associated services.
• Suspend U.S. sanctions on Iran's auto industry, as well as sanctions on associated services.
• License the supply and installation in Iran of spare parts for safety of flight for Iranian civil aviation and associated services. License safety related inspections and repairs in Iran as well as associated services.6
• No new nuclear-related UN Security Council sanctions.
• No new EU nuclear-related sanctions.
• The U.S. Administration, acting consistent with the respective roles of the President and the
Congress, will refrain from imposing new nuclear-related sanctions.
• Establish a financial channel to facilitate humanitarian trade for Iran's domestic needs using Iranian oil revenues held abroad. Humanitarian trade would be defined as transactions involving food and agricultural products, medicine, medical devices, and medical expenses incurred abroad. This channel would involve specified foreign banks and non-designated Iranian banks to be defined when establishing the channel.
o This channel could also enable:
transactions required to pay Iran's UN obligations; and, direct tuition payments to universities and colleges for Iranian students studying abroad, up to an agreed amount for the six month period.
• Increase the EU authorisation thresholds for transactions for non-sanctioned trade to an agreed amount.
Footnotes
5 "Sanctions on associated services" means any service, such as insurance, transportation, or financial, subject to the underlying U.S. or EU sanctions applicable, insofar as each service is related to the underlying sanction and required to facilitate the desired transactions. These services could involve any non-designated Iranian entities.
6 Sanctions relief could involve any non-designated Iranian airlines as well as Iran Air.
Elements of the final step of a comprehensive solution*
The final step of a comprehensive solution, which the parties aim to conclude negotiating and commence implementing no more than one year after the adoption of this document, would:
• Have a specified long-term duration to be agreed upon.
• Reflect the rights and obligations of parties to the NPT and IAEA Safeguards Agreements.
• Comprehensively lift UN Security Council, multilateral and national nuclear-related sanctions, including steps on access in areas of trade, technology, finance, and energy, on a schedule to be agreed upon.
• Involve a mutually defined enrichment programme with mutually agreed parameters consistent with practical needs, with agreed limits on scope and level of enrichment activities, capacity, where it is carried out, and stocks of enriched uranium, for a period to be agreed upon.
• Fully resolve concerns related to the reactor at Arak, designated by the IAEA as the IR-40.
• No reprocessing or construction of a facility capable of reprocessing.
• Fully implement the agreed transparency measures and enhanced monitoring. Ratify and implement the Additional Protocol, consistent with the respective roles of the President and the Majlis (Iranian parliament).
• Include international civil nuclear cooperation, including among others, on acquiring modern light water power and research reactors and associated equipment, and the supply of modern nuclear fuel as well as agreed R&D practices.
• Following successful implementation of the final step of the comprehensive solution for its full duration, the Iranian nuclear programme will be treated in the same manner as that of any non-nuclear weapon state party to the NPT.
• With respect to the final step and any steps in between, the standard principle that "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed" applies.






zappaisgod said:
DidYouSetItToWumbo said:
Webster10 said:
DidYouSetItToWumbo said:
I doubt Iran takes much of anything we do seriously after those 47 whackos in the senate proved our governing bodies lack of intelligence.



How is a veiled threat a lack of intelligence? IMO it probably scared them a little more straight then they would've been.



Because they had no right to be interfering. I don't give a fuck how shitty the deal is, the right way to point this out isn't by passing a folded note under the desk like a third grader.



Number 1 You are ignorant of the laws of the US.  President shitbag is not king.  It is the Senate's job to "interfere" and the letter was posted for the whole world, not under the desk.
Number 2 What deal?  Nobody seems to agree on what it is
Number 3 Iran should be shunned by all freedom loving people in all nations until the mullahs are extinct.  All mullahs should be extinct.



I can agree with this. I'd  far rather have an uneasy peace with the mullahs until they die off rather than a cold/proxy war with Iran for the next couple decades though.


--------------------
"I have no way of knowing whether you, who eventually will read this record, like stories or not. If you do not, no doubt you have turned these pages without attention. I confess that I love them. Indeed, it often seems to me that of all the good things in the world, the only ones humanity can claim for itself are stories and music; the rest, mercy, beauty, sleep, clean water and hot food (as the Ascian would have said) are all the work of the Increate. Thus, stories are small things indeed in the scheme of the universe, but it is hard not to love best what is our own—hard for me, at least."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: setb]
    #21505696 -

setb said:
DidYouSetItToWumbo said:
Webster10 said:
DidYouSetItToWumbo said:
I doubt Iran takes much of anything we do seriously after those 47 whackos in the senate proved our governing bodies lack of intelligence.



How is a veiled threat a lack of intelligence? IMO it probably scared them a little more straight then they would've been.



Because they had no right to be interfering. I don't give a fuck how shitty the deal is, the right way to point this out isn't by passing a folded note under the desk like a third grader.



I have a feeling that if the democrats did the same exact thing then you'd be cheering on their bold move.



Based only on what I have posted I would probably assume the same if I was in your shoes, but I actually dislike both parties..I tend to vote Democratic only because Republicans can't seem to remove their heads out of their ass when it comes to basic social issues.

Either way our political parties are really just stagnating progress in our country, saying whatever they want just to pander to the most common denominator while knowing full well they can't get anything done.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: DidYouSetItToWumbo]
    #21505703 -

I can agree with that. Obama does need to go through the Senate so I can understand why they're a little cheesed off.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: DidYouSetItToWumbo]
    #21505705 -

I can totally see it now... Iran being the new chernobyl.


--------------------
FREE BURKE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Mescalean]
    #21505714 -

Lets be honest here.

Does anyone really give a fuck about that "deal" and what it is about?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Mescalean]
    #21505728 -

The only reason isreal hasn't done atrocities to iran already is because they can fight back. They may not have nukes but they have lots of conventional weapons and can make dirty bombs. Its easier to pick on the weak and sick like the palis.


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Stonehenge]
    #21505731 -

Israel could destroy Iran today if they wanted to.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #21505736 -

zappaisgod said:
Israel could destroy Iran today if they wanted to.



With their nukes? Why are they allowed nukes and not iran? Isreal is the evil aggressor in the region along with usa. We should give up our nukes too.


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #21505737 -

zappaisgod said:
Israel could destroy Iran today if they wanted to.



LOL

Only if you guys give them the money and military power to do so.

Israel without the US is a worthless country with no resources other than a religion that nobody seems to like.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Patlal]
    #21505744 -

Patlal said:
Lets be honest here.

Does anyone really give a fuck about that "deal" and what it is about?



I don't give a shit about Iran having nuclear weapons, but I do care about not having the US be drawn into yet another war because Netanyahu is hungry for blood. We haven't had even a remotely friendly relationship with Iran since we staged a coup of a somewhat liberal, democratically elected prime minister in the 50s to replace him with the Shah. We DIRECTLY caused the rise of the Mullahs and the Ayatollah, and now is one of the first real opportunities we've had in decades to change our diplomatic relations from outright hostile to, if not allies, than at least not antagonistic.  Hell, we might even say sorry for blowing up that Iranian airliner full of civilians back in the day and giving the soldiers that did it a medal for excellent service.


--------------------
"I have no way of knowing whether you, who eventually will read this record, like stories or not. If you do not, no doubt you have turned these pages without attention. I confess that I love them. Indeed, it often seems to me that of all the good things in the world, the only ones humanity can claim for itself are stories and music; the rest, mercy, beauty, sleep, clean water and hot food (as the Ascian would have said) are all the work of the Increate. Thus, stories are small things indeed in the scheme of the universe, but it is hard not to love best what is our own—hard for me, at least."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Stonehenge]
    #21505749 -

Stonehenge said:
zappaisgod said:
Israel could destroy Iran today if they wanted to.



With their nukes? Why are they allowed nukes and not iran? Isreal is the evil aggressor in the region along with usa. We should give up our nukes too.



:lolsy:  Oh great.  Your answer is to let psychotic lunatics have nukes in order to counter the obviously unpsychotic people who already have them.  Why don't we just sell all the freakshows nukes?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Patlal]
    #21505758 -

Patlal said:
zappaisgod said:
Israel could destroy Iran today if they wanted to.



LOL

Only if you guys give them the money and military power to do so.

Israel without the US is a worthless country with no resources other than a religion that nobody seems to like.




France and Germany have both armed Israel pretty significantly too. Iirc Germany is where they get all their nuclear capable submarines. Israel has definitely been burning their bridges hard recently though. They've managed to ostracize a solid portion of Europe and their US relations have taken a pretty drastic hit as well. They're gonna be fucked if they elect a democrat next year that ISN'T Hillary Clinton.


--------------------
"I have no way of knowing whether you, who eventually will read this record, like stories or not. If you do not, no doubt you have turned these pages without attention. I confess that I love them. Indeed, it often seems to me that of all the good things in the world, the only ones humanity can claim for itself are stories and music; the rest, mercy, beauty, sleep, clean water and hot food (as the Ascian would have said) are all the work of the Increate. Thus, stories are small things indeed in the scheme of the universe, but it is hard not to love best what is our own—hard for me, at least."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #21505771 -

What about all those nukes that went missing from the USSR? What happened to all those lil guys.

I'm just saying. Watch. Iran will get the deal. and there will be an "accident" at one of the plants. The mossad motto "wage war by deception".

If israel really wanted to they could take out that entire region with their nuclear arsenal. I find it ridiculous how many nukes they are allowed. And after seeing some interviews from IDF soldiers and how fucking blood thirsty for the palis they are, I wouldn't call them sane either. Intelligent fuck yes not sane.


Albert Pike did state world war 3 would be centered around israel the zionist agenda and the middle east in general...


--------------------
FREE BURKE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Patlal]
    #21505785 -

Patlal said:
zappaisgod said:
Israel could destroy Iran today if they wanted to.



LOL

Only if you guys give them the money and military power to do so.

Israel without the US is a worthless country with no resources other than a religion that nobody seems to like.



But they have us by the balls via pac's, bribery, and the media in their pocket

cjb
>France and Germany have both armed Israel pretty significantly too. Iirc Germany is where they get all their nuclear capable submarines. Israel has definitely been burning their bridges hard recently though. They've managed to ostracize a solid portion of Europe and their US relations have taken a pretty drastic hit as well. They're gonna be fucked if they elect a democrat next year that ISN'T Hillary Clinton.

They are like the boss' son who terrorizes all the employees who can't retaliate.

zap
>Oh great.  Your answer is to let psychotic lunatics have nukes in order to counter the obviously unpsychotic people who already have them

It seems like its the psychos who have them now.

mesc
> Iran will get the deal. and there will be an "accident" at one of the plants. The mossad motto "wage war by deception".

True, that and out and out terrorism


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Stonehenge]
    #21505810 -

And pat it's more so Zionism that is the neg not the actual faith, there are actually jews who are not for zionism and actually follow what the torrah says, and that is that israel is not to be an independent free standing state after the temple was destroyed. While I'm not jewish I did get the opportunity to learn about the religion, one thing I can take away I say I like, from a young age they encourage you to ask questions. Question everything.


--------------------
FREE BURKE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Is the iran deal good or should we bomb them anyway? [Re: Mescalean]
    #21505852 -

Why don't we put sanctions on isreal until they give up their nukes? Discuss.


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore Cultivation Supplies   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* What's the big deal about coke?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Tasty_Smurf_House 7,818 60 09/22/04 07:19 PM
by KidShelleen
* London Bombed Again
( 1 2 all )
TheFakeSunRa 4,166 34 07/21/05 02:23 PM
by Noetical
* Cartoon calling for suicide bombings Irradiated_Feces 671 2 11/05/05 05:52 AM
by Konnrade
* Iran hearkens back to Khomeini days, bans Western Music. OneMoreRobot3021 887 14 12/20/05 10:21 AM
by dr0mni
* Iran flexes military muscle SynapticMisfire 1,311 11 01/18/05 05:41 PM
by Liz
* Drop Acid, Not Bombs!
( 1 2 3 all )
dblaney 4,724 50 09/24/05 07:47 PM
by thegatewaydrug
* Iran invasion pool. shroommachine 459 2 03/07/05 12:12 AM
by SneezingPenis
* Dealing with prosletyzing Christians
( 1 2 all )
Noviseer 3,884 27 06/27/05 01:29 PM
by Liz

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
5,027 topic views. 1 members, 252 guests and 93 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.037 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.