Auto-SummaryThis forum post discusses various aspects of gender roles, patriarchy, and societal expectations. The author argues that the media often portrays men unfairly, suggesting that misogyny is a tool to promote this imbalance. They claim that women have historically taken care of their own while men have not, and that equality should mean representation for both genders. The post criticizes the concept of "daddy issues" and the idea that men are disposable, questioning the fairness of a system that sacrifices men for the sake of representation. The author emphasizes the need for independent and strong women who can ditch traditional gender roles and support each other without relying on men. They also touch on the potential consequences of reversing gender roles, particularly the lack of men to sustain individual freedom. The post concludes by questioning the morality of a system that leaves men behind and highlights the importance of questioning societal norms and structures.
Quote: It applies equally to girls having no or poor father figures. Daddy issues. The reality on the ground is different than what the media might suggest. The media is playing groups against each other and since society is patriarchal the promotion of misandry is a good way to work that angle. Despite your perception women in general don't fare well in today's society.
Women have been caring for their own for a long time now. Men not at all, so the media does not represent men at all. Equality would mean representation for both genders. I say misogyny is good because women call male representation misogyny. No need to take my misogyny personally. I now believe that 99% of men are not a part of the patriarchy and do not receive any 'privileges'. The Patriarchy sacrifices/disposes of men. Wasting the potential of generations of people with free time by just running them down all the time. Oh you are a quite one? here have these pills to make you grind your teeth in your sleep and live on this unemployment benefit.
I do not claim that women fare well in today's society. I am on their side. They want to be strong and independent. So be independent, make your own way, there were enough laws passed to bring equality years ago, there has surely got to be a point where women just need to step up and be brilliant. Marrying men, controlling them and then cashing in on these relationships does not seem very brilliant. This behavior may be brilliant but certainly should not be put up with. If these women are strong, then change the fucking gender roles already and ditch all tradition, be independent of the justice system.
As for male spaces, male discussion, male validity independent of female approval, don't take this misogyny personally. I'm not going to be offended by woman's misandry, but misogyny and misandry are just attitudes, letting off steam, flapping my arms at the moon, nothing that requires legal supervision or consequences or offense. No need for police, courtrooms, petitions, public media wizard burnings or ruined careers.
>>Perhaps this system is using woman's struggles as just one more tool to eliminate freedom once and for all. 
Quote:
Quote: The problem I see with the female dominant situation that we have now, is that soon there will be no men left to sustain individual freedom. Chinese and Islamic subjugation for all because resistance offends people. When roles get reversed the men get screwed every time, women cannot stand being the family bread winner, they always despise the home husband. How is the absence of men looking out for men a moral high ground? How could any man be an alpha if every man must submit to suspect culture? How come no one gives a shit that genital mutilation of males is still legal in all the 'free' nations.
Yes, the fabric of traditional society is falling apart. This is partly a technological breakdown, but also part of a multi century process. The empire is falling apart as they always do, just on a larger scale than ever. If you look at the history of Europe and the Near East there are general upward and downward social trends based on the rise and fall of empires. I'm not sure there was ever a golden age though, rather we get the refined cultures of the elite and middle class, while the poor wage slaves live as they always have. Absent and mentally ill parents transmit their sins to the sons and daughters and lives of subsistence generates too much anxiety to support refined behavior. There's an ebb and flow to it but humanity is always wretched to some degree.
I have been second guessing myself today, seemed to have faltered along the lines of there is nothing to concern myself with beyond the world that I can see. But that is the attitude of my inner life. The word is a sword, it is for cutting, slashing, hacking and ripping. There is another simple message. HeForHe. The patriarchy/The Matrix is bad for everyone. Don't take each others racism seriously, don't trust any traditions, don't dispose of ourselves, ridicule the the The Matrix endlessly, bend their words to fit your own purposes, use bad words as good words and ZZrips satanic occult oppressors lose control.
Quote: no one is convincing me that the patriarchy was based on oppression of women
Not necessarily oppression, control. Women are traditionally at the bottom of their respective pyramid. They need a man to be respectable and the man is head of the household. Control.
Intelligent women with higher than average attention for thought go to the extent of supporting women's rights but declaring their opposition to feminism because of the hardcore clinging (DA) to the original femtext that declares for all eternity, that feminism is based on opposition to the patriarchy, which is based on the oppression of men. This problem is coming from gender studies classes and media, from the top down, from the patriarchy. This is an unthinking menace. All that social media and no cutting, slashing, hacking and ripping, in other words questioning everything, challenging the damned program.
Edited by usulpsychonaut (12/23/14 07:17 AM)
|